Skip to main content

Neuromation

Neuromation / Neurotoken (NTK) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Neuromation — an AI‑oriented project/service (MLOps/AI transformation are claimed in Tier‑1 on the website) with the NTK token (ERC‑20, Ethereum). No Tier‑1 confirmation of a working AI component at the protocol level with metrics/architecture was found.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the project’s website/materials describe AI/MLOps services/a platform (Tier‑1).
  • Who it’s for: teams/businesses that need AI/MLOps solutions (claimed).
  • Why onchain/token: a token contract (ERC‑20) on Ethereum is confirmed; Tier‑1 describes the use of NTK for payments/settlements within the platform (via credits).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: contacts the service/solutions (claimed).
  2. The system does: provides AI/MLOps infrastructure/services (claimed).
  3. The user gets: deployment/support of ML projects (claimed).
  4. Where the blockchain is: a token contract on the Ethereum network is confirmed; other onchain components are not established.
  5. Token role (if any): Tier‑1 describes the use of NTK for payments/settlements within the platform (via credits).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Neuromation
Also known as (aliases) Neurotoken; NTK
Logo (logo) ../assets/544_neurotoken_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) NTK
Category AI/Other | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x69beab403438253f13b6e92db91f7fb849258263
Token model (token_type) utility (service + compute payments)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI/MLOps services + platform
Use‑case (use_case) MLOps platform
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In Tier‑1 sources, Neuromation describes AI/MLOps services and a platform for bringing ML projects to production.
A token contract on Ethereum is confirmed, but no verifiable artifacts were found that would allow raising AI_1..AI_4 (metrics/architecture/demo) strictly per Tier‑1.

Features/modules

  • AI transformation & MLOps (claimed on the website).
  • Examples/cases of AI solutions (claimed).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a team wants to run ML in production → receives MLOps infrastructure/assistance (claimed).
  • Scenario 2: a business orders a custom AI solution → receives implementation/consulting (claimed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: contact the project’s service/team (details in links_*).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (the NTK token — ERC‑20).
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for onchain operations; product/service fees — not established.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the NTK token contract (Ethereum) + an offchain service/platform (details not established).
  • Participant roles: clients/the project team (claimed).
  • Where logic runs: onchain is confirmed only at the token level; the rest is offchain (details not established).
  • Dependencies: — (not found per Tier‑1).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: Tier‑1 describes the use of NTK for payments/settlements within the platform (via credits).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: not established.
  • Who pays fees: users for transactions on the Ethereum network (gas).
  • Where fees go: to the Ethereum network validators (gas); the project’s protocol fees — not established.
  • Issuance/burn: — (not established).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: — (not established).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (not established).
  • Treasury: — (not established).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not established).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (not established).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: — (not established).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not established).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (not found per Tier‑1).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: — (not found per Tier‑1).
  • Threat model: the token utility is not confirmed; in addition, the AI part is presented without measurable artifacts.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: — (not established).
  • Key releases/milestones: — (not established).
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (not found per Tier‑1).
  • Partners: — (not found per Tier‑1).
  • Where it’s actually used: — (not found per Tier‑1).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 website positions the project as AI/MLOps; verifiable artifacts (demo/metrics/architecture) for AI_1..AI_4 were not found per Tier‑1.
  • What is truly onchain? The NTK token contract on the Ethereum network is confirmed.
  • Why is a token needed? Tier‑1 describes the use of the NTK token for payments/settlements within the platform (credits); at the same time, the “strict necessity” of the token (as an irreplaceable mechanism) is not confirmed.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): risk of “AI‑hype” without metrics/architecture; the tokenomics/economic necessity of the token requires additional Tier‑1 artifacts; the current status of the product also requires re‑checking.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): in the Tier‑1 source, the project describes AI transformation & MLOps.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neuromation.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this records intent but does not prove a working AI component of the protocol with artifacts.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a verifiable description of AI features (what exactly the AI does) was not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neuromation.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient specifics for 1 → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/example of the AI part was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 demo → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: not found.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): metrics not found → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a tech description/versions of the AI component were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: NTK token (ERC‑20): 0x69beab403438253f13b6e92db91f7fb849258263
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x69beab403438253f13b6e92db91f7fb849258263
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of the onchain artifact is confirmed in the block explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (only the token is confirmed).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no grounds for 1 were found → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established (strictly).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no grounds for 1 were found → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, NTK (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x69beab403438253f13b6e92db91f7fb849258263
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of the token is confirmed by the contract.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 describes that the platform’s services are paid for/settled in NTK (via internal credits).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://medium.com/neuromation-blog/how-the-neuromation-business-model-utilizes-the-ntk-token-feaada12c1b2
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the official material describes the mechanism of payment and settlement in NTK.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no grounds for 1 were found → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no grounds for 1 were found → 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 describes that users can pay for services with fiat/a card, while the platform purchases NTK on the market and credits “virtual NTK”/credits.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://medium.com/neuromation-blog/how-the-neuromation-business-model-utilizes-the-ntk-token-feaada12c1b2
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of a “fiat → NTK” scheme indicates the potential replaceability of the token as a means of payment.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://neuromation.io/ intent: the project positions an AI/MLOps direction
Tier‑1 https://medium.com/neuromation-blog/how-the-neuromation-business-model-utilizes-the-ntk-token-feaada12c1b2 Tier‑1: the NTK utility is described as settlement/payment for services (credits), including the purchase of credits via the purchase of NTK
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x69beab403438253f13b6e92db91f7fb849258263 onchain: the NTK token contract (ERC‑20, Ethereum)
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 evidence of a demo/metrics/architecture of the AI component was found.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/neurotoken/ reference token profile (not proof of utility)
Tier‑3 — —

No comments to display

Back to top