Skip to main content

DeepSeek AI Agent

DeepSeek AI Agent — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

DeepSeek AI Agent — a token on the Solana network that is positioned in public sources as AI‑related; no Tier‑1 confirmation of a working AI component was found.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a token on Solana; the current set of links has almost no official Tier‑1 artifacts (docs/repo/whitepaper).
  • Who it’s for: holders/the community of the token (per the available links).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain confirms the existence of the token and its parameters; the purpose of the token as utility is not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: performs operations with the SPL token on the Solana network.
  2. The network does: records the token’s transactions/balances onchain.
  3. The user gets: transfer/receipt of the token within the Solana ecosystem.
  4. Where the blockchain is: all the logic here boils down to the fact of the token’s existence and its circulation.
  5. Token role: the utility/role in the product is not established per Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name DeepSeek AI Agent
Also known as (aliases) —
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) —
Category Meme
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) —
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the current set of links, this looks like an SPL token on the Solana network with an AI label in its name. No Tier‑1 documentation/repository/whitepaper was found that would confirm the existence of a working AI component or product (rather than just a token).

Features/modules

  • Onchain token: the existence of the SPL token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Contract audit (claimed): there is an external auditor’s report (see links_*).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user transfers the SPL token on the Solana network.
  • Scenario 2: a participant checks the token in the explorer and the related links.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana.
  • Fees: Solana network fees.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an SPL token (Solana).
  • Participant roles: wallet users and token holders.
  • Where logic runs: onchain accounting of token balances/transfers.
  • Dependencies: Solana infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Issuance/burn: not established per Tier‑1.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: there is an external report (see links_* Audit report(s)).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: typical risks of SPL tokens; in addition, the AI label in the current materials is not accompanied by supporting artifacts.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: mainnet (a Solana token).
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? no Tier‑1 confirmation of a working AI component or product was found.
  • What is truly onchain? an SPL token on the Solana network (there is a link to the explorer).
  • Why is a token needed? the utility/necessity of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Why is a token needed? the utility/necessity of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (AI in the name without Tier‑1 artifacts); the absence of docs/a repository/a whitepaper in links_*.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 declaration of AI intent was found in the current set of links.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 source we do not confirm intent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): It is not established that the project has AI functionality as a product/service.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 docs/code/description of an AI module.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/app was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without Tier‑1 demo links we do not raise the flag.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics of the AI system are not established.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No tech description of an AI component was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 documentation/code/versions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: SPL mint: 9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The explorer confirms the onchain existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the existence of the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of protocol logic beyond the token was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not applicable/not established (no product beyond the token was found).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no described product for which onchain would be critical.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The token exists as an SPL mint on Solana.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The explorer confirms the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Payment for services with the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 docs/whitepaper describing the utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the economic mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance mechanics via the token are not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established (the utility is not described).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a utility specification, replaceability cannot be reasonably discussed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/9A2jUbgoDY97fruKHXvDd7eQiq4xvnW3By1BfH1Bwn9Y Onchain fact: the SPL token (mint) exists on Solana.
Tier‑1 https://www.cyberscope.io/audits/coin-deepseek-ai-agent Claimed audit of the token/contract (external report).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for the claim about a working AI component/AI agent was found.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/deepseek-ai-agent/ Token profile/metadata (for reference).

No comments to display

Back to top