Tell a Tale

Tell a Tale — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Tell a Tale — a product that is described on the website as an AI agent for short video & film production; there is a web application (demo). The onchain part is confirmed by the existence of the TAT token on BNB Smart Chain.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a web application for generating/creating stories/scripts (claimed as an “AI agent” for videos/films).
Who it’s for: content creators/authors and users who want to generate stories.
What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://app.tellatale.ai/
Why onchain/token: the TAT token on BNB Smart Chain is confirmed; the role of the token in the product is not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: opens the web application and chooses a mode/story template.
The system does: provides script templates and a creation interface (per the app).
The user gets: the created story/content (details of how the AI part works are not disclosed by Tier‑1).
Where the blockchain is: onchain — the TAT token on BNB Smart Chain.
Token role: not established per Tier‑1 sources (a description of the utility/rules of token usage in the product is needed).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	Tell a Tale
Also known as (aliases)	TellATale, TAT
Logo (logo)	../assets/510_tell-a-tale_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker)	TAT
Category	AI/Agents
Primary chain (chain)	BNB Smart Chain
Type	EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	BEP-20
Token contract	0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	1,000,000,000 TAT
Issuance	fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	Max total supply 1B (per the Explorer).
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	yes
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI agent for story/script generation
Use‑case (use_case)	story generation for short video/film
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://www.tellatale.ai/
App / Demo	https://app.tellatale.ai/
Docs	—
GitHub	—
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	—
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://bscscan.com/token/0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61
X	https://twitter.com/tellatale_ai
Discord	https://discord.com/invite/XqeKTAdW
Telegram	—
Medium	—
Audit report(s)	https://www.cyberscope.io/audits/coin-tell-a-tale
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/tell-a-tale
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tell-a-tale/

General project overview

Tell a Tale is a web product that is positioned on the website as an “AI agent for short video & film production”. The public application shows creation modes and a gallery/ranking, but no Tier‑1 technical documentation (model architecture, quality metrics) is listed in this card.

Features/modules

Create: the interface for creating/launching scripts (app).
Gallery: viewing the created content (app).
Ranking: ranking/popular items (app).

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: the user chooses a story template → launches creation → receives a draft/result.
Scenario 2: the user browses the gallery/ranking → studies examples.

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: a browser and access to the web application (see links_* App / Demo).
Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain — for the TAT token (if interaction with the token is required).
Fees: BSC transaction fees for operations with the token; the role of the token in the application is not established.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: web client/application + a BEP‑20 token on BNB Smart Chain.
Participant roles: application users; token holders (role not established).
Where logic runs: offchain — content generation/creation; onchain — the token.
Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain (EVM) for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Token role in the product: not established per Tier‑1 (the website has a “Buy $TAT” button, but a description of the utility is absent).
Max supply (Tier‑1): 1,000,000,000 TAT (BscScan).

Governance

Who makes decisions: —.
How protocol parameters change: —.
Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

Audits: a CyberScope report is claimed (see links_* Audit report(s)).
Bug bounty: —.
Incidents: —.
Threat model: risks of the token smart contract (admin functions/pause/fees — to be checked in the report and the contract), as well as risks of the closed offchain part of the AI application.

Project status and timeline

Current status: active (there is a website, an app and a token).
Key releases/milestones: —.
Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

Integrations: —.
Partners: —.
Where it’s actually used: the web application and public pages (links_*).

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? there is Tier‑1 positioning as an “AI agent” and an accessible web application; but there is no Tier‑1 tech description of the models and quality metrics.
What is truly onchain? the TAT token as a BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain.
Why is a token needed? not established per Tier‑1 (docs/a description of the utility are needed).
Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing risk (no tech docs/metrics), token‑washing (the role of the token is not described) — what to double‑check: docs/whitepaper/utility, the link between the token and the app functionality.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	medium	2
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	0
Evidence	Tier‑1 present	2

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): AI is claimed as a working component (there is an app), so this is not only an “intent”.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.tellatale.ai/ ; https://app.tellatale.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 is used only when AI_1..AI_4 = 0.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): The product is described as an AI agent for short video & film production (generation/creation of stories/scripts).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.tellatale.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the function of the AI part (at the level of “what it does”).
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): There is a web application with Create/Gallery/Ranking modes and script templates.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://app.tellatale.ai/
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The demo is publicly available and reproducible.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics/benchmarks were not found.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Technical documentation of the AI models/versions was not found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no docs/whitepaper with the model architecture/versions.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: BNB Smart Chain
Addresses/identifiers: 0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61 (BEP‑20)
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The explorer confirms the token/network/max supply.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the existence of the token).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source about onchain logic beyond the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: the application works offchain; the criticality of the blockchain for the core function is not proven.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 “without the blockchain it breaks down”.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has a token, TAT.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Explorer confirms the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Payment for services with the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has no description of the token utility for payments/access.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties are not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of incentives.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of governance.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 comparison of alternatives.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://www.tellatale.ai/	Tier‑1 positioning: “AI agent for short video & film production”, the token CA.
Tier‑1	https://app.tellatale.ai/	Demo: a public web application (Create/Gallery/Ranking, script templates).
Tier‑1	https://bscscan.com/token/0x996D1b997203a024E205069a304161ba618d1c61	The TAT token on BSC: contract/network/Max total supply 1B.
Tier‑2	https://www.cyberscope.io/audits/coin-tell-a-tale	Automated audit/risk assessment of the contract (for reference).
Tier‑2	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tell-a-tale/	Token profile/metadata (for reference).
Tier‑2	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/tell-a-tale	Token profile/metadata (for reference).