Work X
Work X — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Work X — a project about a labor/recruiting marketplace with claimed AI matching logic (WorkPi) and the $WORK token on Ethereum (ERC‑20). Tier‑1 sources describe AI as part of the concept/plan; no Tier‑1 demo/metrics were found.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an online marketplace of vacancies/freelance (“internet of jobs”) with profile infrastructure and matching.
- Who it’s for: job seekers, freelancers and employers.
- Why onchain/token: the $WORK token is claimed as a means of access/interaction with the platform and as part of the incentives/distribution mechanisms (per Tier‑1).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: creates a profile/resume and searches for vacancies or posts a vacancy.
- The system does: matches the profile and the vacancy (WorkPi/AI‑matching is claimed), helps with applications and communication.
- The user gets: selections/matching and tools for searching/hiring.
- Where the blockchain is: onchain — the $WORK token and related smart contracts (ERC‑20 and contract mechanics per the repository).
- Token role: access/interaction with the platform’s services and the incentive mechanics described in the whitepaper.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Work X |
| Also known as (aliases) | WorkX, The Internet of Jobs |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/508_work-x_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | WORK |
| Category | AI/Agents | Marketplace |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2021 |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x8888888837f84a7a82668e0320ac454f5945d0b9 |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (access + payments) |
| Max supply | 100,000,000 WORK |
| Issuance | fixed (capped) |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Access/interaction with the platform via $WORK; supply cap 100M; role‑based mint within the cap (per GitHub). |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | Rik Rapmund (CEO), Daniël de Witte (CTO) |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI candidate/job matching |
| Use‑case (use_case) | jobs/freelance marketplace |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 1 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://workx.io |
| Docs | https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf |
| GitHub | https://github.com/Work-X-Official/work-x-token |
| Releases / Changelog | https://github.com/Work-X-Official/work-x-token/commits/main/ |
| Whitepaper | https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | https://github.com/Work-X-Official/work-x-token/security |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x8888888837f84a7a82668e0320ac454f5945d0b9 |
| X | https://twitter.com/WorkX_official |
| Discord | https://discord.com/invite/workx |
| Telegram | https://t.me/WorkX_Telegram |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@WorkX |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/work-x |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/work-x/ |
General project overview
In the whitepaper, Work X is positioned as “The Internet of Jobs”: a platform that should reduce the fees of “intermediaries” (job boards/freelance platforms) and improve matching between employers and performers. The ecosystem mentions WorkPi (assessment of skills/characteristics/preferences), self‑sovereign identity (SSI) wallets for data and algorithmic matching.
Features/modules
- Marketplace of vacancies/jobs: listing and search (whitepaper).
- WorkPi (intent): collection/normalization of profile data and matching using ML approaches (whitepaper).
- SSI/data ownership (intent): storage of personal data in SSI wallets and access management (whitepaper).
- Onchain layer: the $WORK token and smart contracts for the token/mechanics (GitHub + Explorer).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a job seeker fills in a profile and searches for offers → receives recommendations/selections (AI‑matching is claimed).
- Scenario 2: an employer posts a vacancy → receives suitable candidates/applications.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an account on the platform (Website) and, if necessary, the $WORK token (whitepaper).
- Network/chain: Ethereum (see Explorer).
- Fees: onchain — Ethereum fees for operations with the token/contracts; offchain — the platform’s terms are not established per Tier‑1.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: a web platform (offchain) + onchain contracts (the ERC‑20 $WORK and contracts around NFT/Rewards — per GitHub).
- Participant roles: job seekers, employers, assessment/education providers (whitepaper).
- Where logic runs: offchain — search/matching/interfaces; onchain — the token and contract mechanics.
- Dependencies: Ethereum, OpenZeppelin (per GitHub), Hardhat (per GitHub).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility (Tier‑1): access/interaction with the platform’s services via $WORK (whitepaper).
- Issuance/cap (Tier‑1): the repository describes an ERC‑20 capped token with a cap of 100,000,000 WORK.
- Other parameters (vesting/distribution): not extracted from Tier‑1 (see the whitepaper Tokenomics).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: smart‑contract risks (role‑based mint, access control), risks of the platform’s centralized components.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (there is a token/repository/website).
- Key releases/milestones: the whitepaper is dated 2021‑10 (Tier‑1).
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: assessments/LXP/LMS/HR systems are mentioned as WorkPi integrations (whitepaper).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: — (no Tier‑1 confirmation of production use was found).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? the whitepaper describes an “AI‑recruiter”/matchmaking and lists ML approaches, but no Tier‑1 proof of a working AI module (demo/metrics/tech description of models) was found.
- What is truly onchain? there is the ERC‑20 $WORK token on Ethereum and a smart‑contract part around the token/NFT mechanics (per GitHub/Explorer).
- Why is a token needed? Tier‑1 claims access/interaction with the platform via $WORK.
- Red flags (based on the information found): check for the existence of a real AI module (AI_1..AI_4) and what exactly the onchain part does for the product; irrelevant external links were found on the website (possible domain compromise) — double‑check.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | medium | 2 |
| Token necessity | low | 1 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The whitepaper describes an AI‑recruiter/ML‑matchmaking (as an intention/concept), without Tier‑1 proof of a working AI module.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is a Tier‑1 declaration about the AI direction, but there is no demo/metrics/tech description of models.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A working AI component/module is not confirmed by Tier‑1 artifacts (code/demo/launch).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes the concept but does not provide verifiable artifacts “in production”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/example of the AI matching in operation was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a reproducible demo/example we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No quantitative metrics/benchmarks were found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Model versions/the architecture of the AI modules are not documented as a verifiable technical artifact.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper does not replace a tech description of the model/versions.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: 0x8888888837f84a7a82668e0320ac454f5945d0b9 (ERC‑20)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8888888837f84a7a82668e0320ac454f5945d0b9
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The explorer confirms the token contract on Ethereum.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 1
- What useful logic is onchain: the repository describes contracts around the Genesis NFT and reward mechanics (staking/rewards).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/Work-X-Official/work-x-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): GitHub describes a contract stack beyond “just ERC‑20”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: the marketplace/matching can work offchain; onchain is needed for the token/incentives, but criticality for the core function is not proven by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 wording “without the blockchain the product breaks down”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token, $WORK.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper directly mentions the token of Work X ($WORK).
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The services of the Work X Platform are claimed to be accessible via the $WORK token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper says that interaction with/access to the services is carried out “by the token of Work X ($WORK)”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without specifics/parameters in Tier‑1 we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Governance voting with the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): In the available Tier‑1 fragments, no explicit description of governance via the token was found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 comparison with alternatives (USDC/subscription).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://content.workx.io/whitepaper/Work+X+Whitepaper+V9.pdf | The “Internet of Jobs” concept, the role of WorkPi/AI‑matching (intent) and the fact that access/interaction with the platform is claimed via the $WORK token. |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/Work-X-Official/work-x-token | Tier‑1 artifact of smart contracts: an ERC‑20 capped token + Genesis NFT/reward mechanics (onchain beyond the token). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x8888888837f84a7a82668e0320ac454f5945d0b9 | WORK token contract on Ethereum (address/network). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/work-x/ | Token profile/metadata (for reference). |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/work-x | Token profile/metadata (for reference). |
No comments to display
No comments to display