Skip to main content

Website AI

Website AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Website AI — an AI/Other project on the Ethereum network, token (symbol: WEBAI).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an AI platform/tools for creating websites (Telegram bot + web dApp + tools dashboard) per the Tier‑1 description on the project website.
  • Who it’s for: users/website creators without strong technical expertise; teams that need a fast website builder (per the Tier‑1 description).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain records the WEBAI token; per the Tier‑1 description, premium access is tied to “token holdings” (a condition for access to premium features).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): Telegram bot @WebsiteAIBot, web dApp and tools dashboard (see links_*).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses a wallet and sends/receives the token.
  2. The system does: processes token transactions on the Ethereum network.
  3. The user gets: a confirmed transaction and a balance change.
  4. Where the blockchain is: token issuance/accounting and transactions take place onchain (Ethereum).
  5. Token role (if any): the token exists; per the Tier‑1 description, premium access is tied to the token holdings condition; the website provides tokenomics parameters (tax/lock).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Website AI
Also known as (aliases) —
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) WEBAI
Category AI/Other
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xc73abe8d7a0da644743fe2ad24f4e16bb7ed43f8
Token model (token_type) utility (premium access by token holdings)
Max supply 1 000 000 WEBAI
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Taxes 4/4; initial liquidity 2 ETH; liquidity lock for 12 months (Tier‑1 website).
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI website builder (content/image generation, templates)
Use‑case (use_case) AI website creation (bot + dApp + tools)
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Website AI, per the Tier‑1 description, positions itself as an AI platform for creating websites: Telegram bot, web dApp and tools dashboard (AI image generation/storage/templates). The website also describes tokenomics parameters and pricing logic where premium access depends on token holdings.

Features/modules

  • The token on the Ethereum network (the onchain address is available via the explorer).
  • WebsiteAI bot / dApp / tools (Tier‑1 website).
  • AI features: content and image generation, templates (Tier‑1 website).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user sends/receives the token → receives a confirmed transaction on Ethereum.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum.
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees (gas) for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the token (ERC‑20) on the Ethereum network; project materials (Website/Whitepaper).
  • Participant roles: users.
  • Where logic runs: operations with the token are processed onchain (Ethereum).
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: per the Tier‑1 description, premium access is determined by the share of token holdings; the website mentions a revenue share program and a staking pool (as elements of the ecosystem).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: per the Tier‑1 description, the token is used as an access condition (token holdings), details of “payment with the token” are not recorded.
  • Who pays fees: users pay Ethereum network fees for transactions.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: —.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: published on the official website (see links_*; “Product roadmap” section).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 describes AI features: content/description and image generation, AI templates, assistance in creating websites (bot + dApp + tools).
  • What is truly onchain? Onchain records token issuance/circulation on the Ethereum network; the token address is available via the explorer.
  • Why is a token needed? Per the Tier‑1 description, premium access is tied to the token holdings condition; the other token mechanics require re‑checking against the whitepaper.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): absence of Tier‑1 technical details/AI quality metrics; the onchain part in this card is limited to the token.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 describes AI as an operating product functionality (not just intent).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://websiteai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies to “intent only”; specific AI features are claimed here.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI helps create websites: it generates content/descriptions and images, and suggests templates.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://websiteai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 website describes a set of AI tools and their purpose.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There are public product surfaces: Telegram bot, web dApp and tools dashboard.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://websiteai.io/ ; https://t.me/WebsiteAIBot ; https://websiteai.app/login ; https://tools.websiteai.app/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are links to interfaces where AI functionality is claimed; quality metrics (AI_3) are not specified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics are not applicable: an AI component is not established.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of an AI component is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmed AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum.
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0xc73abe8d7a0da644743fe2ad24f4e16bb7ed43f8.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xc73abe8d7a0da644743fe2ad24f4e16bb7ed43f8
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact (the token address) in a public explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 sources in this card (other than the existence of the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 artifacts of useful onchain logic other than the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 formulation that passes the “replace the blockchain” test.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The token exists on the Ethereum network.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xc73abe8d7a0da644743fe2ad24f4e16bb7ed43f8
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is confirmed by an onchain address in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 describes that the premium plan depends on token holdings (a condition for access to premium features).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://websiteai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is a Tier‑1 description of token‑gated access to functionality (without pay‑per‑use details).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): It is not established that the token is used in mechanisms of incentives/collateral/penalties.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of token incentives was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): It is not established that the token is used in governance.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of token governance was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of the replaceability/irreplaceability of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://websiteai.io/ Official project website (product description, tools, pricing/token holdings, tokenomics).
Tier‑1 https://websiteai.io/whitepaper.pdf Project whitepaper (Tier‑1 material).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xc73abe8d7a0da644743fe2ad24f4e16bb7ed43f8 Onchain: token contract on the Ethereum network (the address is confirmed in the explorer).
Tier‑1 https://t.me/WebsiteAIBot Telegram bot as a product surface (demo surface).
Tier‑1 https://websiteai.app/login Web dApp (product surface).
Tier‑1 https://tools.websiteai.app/ Tools dashboard (product surface).

No comments to display

Back to top