Skip to main content

Viridis Network

Viridis Network — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Viridis Network — a project on the Ethereum network (ERC‑20), token (symbol: VRD). No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: per Tier‑1 (VIRIDIS DAO) — a DAO/platform with participation in governance and initiatives around green tech (per the project’s claim).
  • Who it’s for: participants/investors/“founders” who participate in the DAO and voting (per the project’s claim).
  • Why onchain/token: the ERC‑20 token contract is confirmed onchain; the purpose of the token/product requires a Tier‑1 description.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: — (not established).
  2. The system does: — (not established).
  3. The user gets: — (not established).
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — the ERC‑20 token and public contract data.
  5. Token role (if any): not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Viridis Network
Also known as (aliases) Viridis
Logo (logo) ../assets/784_viridis-network_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) VRD
Category Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xf25304e75026e6a35fedca3b0889ae5c4d3c55d8
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1 000 000 000
Issuance fixed (capped)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) DAO governance + ecosystem participation
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Tier‑1 sources were used within this check (DAO page, whitepaper, repository, onchain fact of the token). No confirmation of an AI component was found per Tier‑1, so DecAI Fit = 0/6 per the SSOT rule.

Features/modules

  • Not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: — (not established).
  • Scenario 2: — (not established).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an Ethereum wallet (if interacting with the token).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (ERC‑20).
  • Fees: onchain Ethereum fees.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 token contract; a public repository (the Tier‑1 link is in links_*).
  • Participant roles: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Where logic runs: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Dependencies: Ethereum RPC.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: not established.
  • Who pays fees: not established.
  • Where fees go: not established.
  • Issuance/burn: not established.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: not established.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: not established.
  • Treasury: not established.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • How protocol parameters change: not found.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: not found.
  • Keys/multisig: not found.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Bug bounty: not found.
  • Incidents: not found.
  • Threat model: not established.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: onchain token contract — mainnet; the rest — not established.
  • Key releases/milestones: not found.
  • Roadmap: not found.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Partners: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Where it’s actually used: not established.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 confirmation of an AI component was found.
  • What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token contract is confirmed onchain.
  • Why is a token needed? Not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI associations without Tier‑1; Tier‑1 docs/whitepaper on the product and token utility need to be found.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 claim/roadmap about AI was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source with AI goals/roadmap.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): No description of AI features was found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 description, it cannot be confirmed that an AI component actually exists and what exactly it does.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): No demo/example of the AI in operation (Tier‑1) was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no App/Demo that can be reproduced from an official source.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: not found.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 metrics/benchmarks for the AI part.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): An AI tech description/architecture (Tier‑1) was not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Public materials (Tier‑1) do not contain AI architecture/versions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xf25304e75026e6a35fedca3b0889ae5c4d3c55d8
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xf25304e75026e6a35fedca3b0889ae5c4d3c55d8
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a verifiable onchain artifact (the token contract) on a public explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0 What useful logic is onchain: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 description of onchain logic of the protocol other than the existence of the token was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established (there is no Tier‑1 description of what exactly breaks down without onchain).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Onchain criticality is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token (onchain ERC‑20 contract).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xf25304e75026e6a35fedca3b0889ae5c4d3c55d8
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is confirmed by the onchain contract.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): Utility as “payment for the service” is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no official description of what is paid for with the token and how.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Token‑based incentives/collateral/penalties are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of the incentive/security mechanism in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token (Tier‑1) was not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source about voting/token holders’ rights.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established (there is no Tier‑1 description of utility/necessity).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 description of the role of the token, replaceability cannot be correctly assessed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xf25304e75026e6a35fedca3b0889ae5c4d3c55d8 The existence of the VRD token (Ethereum, ERC‑20) and max total supply 1 000 000 000.
Tier‑1 https://dao.viridis.info/ Tier‑1 description of VIRIDIS DAO (positioning and participation in governance, per the project’s claim).
Tier‑1 https://github.com/hide001/ViridisNetwork Public repository (Tier‑1 artifact; does not prove AI functionality).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “AI component/model/demo/metrics” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top