Skip to main content

AimBot

AimBot — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AimBot — an AI/Other project on Ethereum, token (symbol: AIMBOT).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the AIMBOT token on the Ethereum network; the website/whitepaper at the specified links are in maintenance mode at the time of the check, so the purpose of the product is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Who it’s for: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Why onchain/token: the AIMBOT ERC‑20 token is confirmed onchain; the necessity of the token and its utility are not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with the token (transfers/DEX, etc.).
  2. The system does: executes token operations on the Ethereum network.
  3. The user gets: the onchain result of the transaction.
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — the AIMBOT ERC‑20 token on Ethereum.
  5. Token role: not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AimBot
Also known as (aliases) AIMBOT
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) AIMBOT
Category AI/Other
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x0c48250Eb1f29491F1eFBeEc0261eb556f0973C7
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1 000 000 AIMBOT
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) unknown
Use‑case (use_case) unknown
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the available Tier‑1 sources, the onchain fact of the existence of the AIMBOT token on the Ethereum network is confirmed. The Website/Whitepaper links display a “Site Maintenance” page at the time of the check, so a substantive Tier‑1 description of the product and AI component is not established.

Features/modules

  • Token: an ERC‑20 contract on Ethereum (Tier‑1).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user sends the token → the transaction is recorded onchain.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an Ethereum wallet for onchain operations.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an ERC‑20 token/contract (onchain); the rest of the product architecture is not established.
  • Participant roles: token holders, Ethereum network participants.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Supply parameters: max total supply 1 000 000 AIMBOT (onchain).
  • Who pays fees: users (gas in ETH) for transactions.
  • Where fees go: to Ethereum network validators/stakers (within the network mechanics).
  • Issuance/burn: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: typical risks of an ERC‑20 token.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: token on Ethereum mainnet.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • What is truly onchain? The AIMBOT ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network.
  • Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): key Tier‑1 pages (Website/Whitepaper) are unavailable (maintenance), so the risk of AI‑washing/token‑washing is high until verifiable Tier‑1 artifacts appear.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 roadmap/document with AI intent was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website/whitepaper are unavailable (maintenance), AI intent is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of AI features was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no available Tier‑1 description of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A demo of the AI component is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Working Tier‑1 product pages are absent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics were not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No tech description of an AI component was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): An available Tier‑1 document is absent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: AIMBOT ERC‑20 token contract: 0x0c48250Eb1f29491F1eFBeEc0261eb556f0973C7
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x0c48250Eb1f29491F1eFBeEc0261eb556f0973C7
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is verifiable via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 proof of onchain logic of the product, beyond the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has an AIMBOT ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x0c48250Eb1f29491F1eFBeEc0261eb556f0973C7
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is verifiable onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Token utility as payment for the service is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper/docs are unavailable, so the claim is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/staking/penalties are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance use of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 source.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient data on the role of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x0c48250Eb1f29491F1eFBeEc0261eb556f0973C7 Onchain facts: the AIMBOT token, Ethereum network, contract, max supply.
Tier‑1 https://aim-bot.app/ Website in maintenance mode at the time of the check (no content for claim validation).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “what the AI/product does” was found (pages are unavailable at the URLs in links_*).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/aimbot/ Aggregator profile (for reference).

No comments to display

Back to top