SocialAI
SocialAI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
SocialAI — a SocialFi project on Ethereum, token (symbol: sAI).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: the SocialAI (sAI) token on the Ethereum network and an associated description of the “SocialAI Engaged” product as a platform for rewarding community activity (Tier‑1 blog post).
- Who it’s for: project teams and their communities (community management).
- Why onchain/token: token issuance is confirmed onchain; no Tier‑1 description of the necessity of the token for the platform’s functionality was found.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: participates in engagement activities/triggers (claimed).
- The system does: records engagement rules/goals and issues rewards (details of integration with the blockchain are not established).
- The user gets: incentives/rewards for interactions (mechanics are not established per Tier‑1).
- Where the blockchain is: the sAI ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network is confirmed onchain.
- Token role: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field |
Value |
| Project name |
SocialAI |
| Also known as (aliases) |
sAI |
| Logo (logo) |
../assets/772_socialai_logo.jpg |
| Token symbol (ticker) |
sAI |
| Category |
SocialFi |
| Primary chain (chain) |
Ethereum |
| Type |
EVM |
| Network status |
mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) |
PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) |
— |
| Project status (status) |
— |
| Token (standard) |
ERC-20 |
| Token contract |
0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230 |
| Token model (token_type) |
— |
| Max supply |
1 000 000 000 sAI |
| Issuance |
— |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) |
— |
| Governance |
— |
| Admins/keys |
— |
| Audit |
— |
| Bug bounty |
— |
| Team (team) |
— |
| Funding (investors/funding) |
— |
| AI component (ai_component) |
— |
| Use‑case (use_case) |
community engagement triggers + rewards |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit |
0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary |
ai_score 0 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified |
2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type |
Link |
| Website |
https://socialai.finance |
| Docs |
https://www.socialai.finance/SocialAI_Whitepaper_1.0.0.pdf |
| GitHub |
— |
| Releases / Changelog |
— |
| Whitepaper |
https://www.socialai.finance/SocialAI_Whitepaper_1.0.0.pdf |
| Roadmap |
— |
| Security advisories |
— |
| Explorer |
https://etherscan.io/token/0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230 |
| X |
https://twitter.com/SocialAIFinance |
| Discord |
— |
| Telegram |
https://t.me/SocialAIPortal |
| Medium |
https://medium.com/@socialai.finance/socialai-engaged-inspire-meaningful-engagement-7df9e411d326 |
| Audit report(s) |
— |
| Bug bounty |
— |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) |
— |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) |
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/socialai/ |
General project overview
SocialAI is a project with an ERC‑20 token, sAI, on the Ethereum network. A Tier‑1 blog post describing “SocialAI Engaged” as a platform for rewarding community activity (Twitter/Telegram triggers, rewards) was found in the available sources. However, the official website/docs/whitepaper URLs from links_* lead to domain sale pages as of the verification date, so some claims remain unverified.
Features/modules
- Engagement triggers (claimed): mechanics that request engagement and issue rewards.
- Community management tools (claimed): templates/blueprints, webshops, rewards (described in the blog).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a project team launches an engagement campaign → community members meet the conditions → receive rewards (claimed).
- Scenario 2: a user interacts with the sAI token → operations are visible onchain.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet for Ethereum and ETH for fees (for onchain operations with the token).
- Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
- Fees: Ethereum network fees for transactions.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the sAI ERC‑20 token contract; the offchain part of the “SocialAI Engaged” product (details are not confirmed per Tier‑1 from docs/website).
- Participant roles: the team, community users, Ethereum infrastructure providers (RPC/DEX).
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the remaining logic is not established per Tier‑1 (docs/whitepaper are unavailable at the URLs from
links_*).
- Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Supply parameters: max total supply 1 000 000 000 sAI (onchain).
- Who pays fees: users (gas in ETH) for transactions.
- Where fees go: to Ethereum network validators/stakers (within the network mechanics).
- Issuance/burn: —.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
- Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: typical risks of an ERC‑20 token and a possible offchain platform (if it exists); accessible Tier‑1 docs/whitepaper are required.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the token on Ethereum mainnet; the product/platform status is not established (website/docs at the URLs from
links_* do not contain project materials).
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? No AI component is identified per the available Tier‑1 sources; the name “SocialAI” in itself is not proof.
- What is truly onchain? The sAI ERC‑20 token on the Ethereum network is confirmed onchain (contract, supply, decimals).
- Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Red flags (based on the information found): website/docs/whitepaper URLs from
links_* lead to domain sale pages as of the verification date; without them, the product’s design and the role of the token cannot be confirmed.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component |
Level |
Score |
| AI reality |
low |
0 |
| Onchain necessity |
low |
1 |
| Token necessity |
low |
0 |
| Evidence |
Tier‑1 present |
2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 declaration of AI intent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available Tier‑1 sources do not confirm AI intent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of AI features/tasks was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without accessible Tier‑1 documentation, the flag remains 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/app was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no verifiable demo.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics/benchmarks were not found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Tier‑1: no tech description of the AI part was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without documentation, the flag remains 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: sAI ERC‑20 token contract: 0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token parameters are verifiable onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than token issuance/circulation).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 confirmation of the product’s onchain logic beyond the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has an ERC‑20 token, sAI, on the Ethereum network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is verifiable onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of payment for the service with the sAI token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of payment mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties for sAI was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no confirmed economic mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of the use of the sAI token for governance was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmation of governance mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 description of the role of the token, no conclusion can be drawn.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier |
Source |
What it proves |
| Tier‑1 |
https://etherscan.io/token/0x8ca5bb317f73fcd8a9f7d122c14b9a1f87688230 |
Onchain facts: the SocialAI (sAI) token, Ethereum network, contract, decimals, max supply. |
| Tier‑1 |
https://medium.com/@socialai.finance/socialai-engaged-inspire-meaningful-engagement-7df9e411d326 |
Description of “SocialAI Engaged” as a platform for engagement triggers and rewards (project claims). |
| Tier‑1 |
https://socialai.finance |
As of the verification date, the “Website” URL leads to a domain sale page (no project content). |
| Tier‑1 |
https://www.socialai.finance/SocialAI_Whitepaper_1.0.0.pdf |
As of the verification date, the “Docs/Whitepaper” URL leads to a domain sale page (whitepaper unavailable). |
| Tier‑2 |
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/socialai/ |
Aggregator profile (for reference; not Tier‑1 proof). |
No comments to display
No comments to display