Cipher Protocol
Cipher Protocol — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Cipher Protocol — an Infra project on Ethereum, token (symbol: CIPHER).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a project with an ERC‑20 token, CIPHER, on the Ethereum network and a public
cipher-corerepository (circuits + smart contracts). - Who it’s for: developers and protocol users (exact roles/scenarios are not established per Tier‑1 sources).
- Why onchain/token: the onchain part envisages smart contracts; the role of the CIPHER token (payment/incentives/governance) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: interacts with the protocol/contracts (the specific UX is not established).
- The system does: uses a chain of smart contracts and corresponding circuits/verifier contracts (per the repository structure).
- The user gets: the result of a protocol operation (not established).
- Where the blockchain is: Ethereum (ERC‑20 token; the existence of contract code in the repository).
- Token role: not established per Tier‑1.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Cipher Protocol |
| Also known as (aliases) | CIPHER |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/773_cipher-protocol_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | CIPHER |
| Category | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | — |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4 |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | 10 000 000 CIPHER |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | circuits + smart contracts (UTXO-style) |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://cipherterminal.com/ |
| Docs | https://docs.cipherterminal.com/cipher-protocol/overview/enter-the-cipher |
| GitHub | https://github.com/Cipher-Protocol |
| Releases / Changelog | https://github.com/Cipher-Protocol/cipher-core/commits |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | https://github.com/Cipher-Protocol/cipher-core/security |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4 |
| X | https://twitter.com/Cipherterminal |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/CipherTerminal |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cipher-protocol/ |
General project overview
Cipher Protocol is a project with an ERC‑20 token, CIPHER, on the Ethereum network. links_* includes a Tier‑1 cipher-core repository containing circuits/ and contracts/ directories, as well as build and test instructions. A Tier‑1 description of the product (from docs/website) is not established, so conclusions about its purpose and the role of the token remain conservative.
Features/modules
- Cipher core (codebase): circuits and smart contracts (per the repository structure).
- Dev tooling: build instructions (Node.js 16+, build:circuit, build:contract, test:contract).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a developer builds circuits and contracts from the repository → receives build artifacts (solidity verifier contract etc.).
- Scenario 2: a user interacts with the CIPHER token → operations are visible onchain.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet for Ethereum and ETH for fees (for onchain operations with the token).
- Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
- Fees: Ethereum network fees for transactions.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: smart contracts + circuits (per the
cipher-corerepository), the CIPHER ERC‑20 token. - Participant roles: developers, users, Ethereum infrastructure providers (RPC/DEX).
- Where logic runs: onchain — protocol contracts (if deployed) and the token; offchain — proof generation/verification (based on the presence of circuits).
- Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure; the build toolchain (Node.js).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Supply parameters: max total supply 10 000 000 CIPHER (onchain).
- Who pays fees: users (gas in ETH) for transactions.
- Where fees go: to Ethereum network validators/stakers (within the network mechanics).
- Issuance/burn: —.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: —.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
- Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: smart contract risks and risks to the correctness of circuits; without a Tier‑1 description of deployments/audits, the assessment is conservative.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the token on Ethereum mainnet; the status of the protocol as a product is not established.
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? No AI component is identified per Tier‑1 sources.
- What is truly onchain? The CIPHER ERC‑20 token is confirmed onchain and there is a public repository with smart contracts/circuits.
- Why is a token needed? Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
- Red flags (based on the information found): absence of an accessible Tier‑1 description of the product (confirmation from docs/website is needed); the role of the token is not confirmed.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | medium | 2 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 declaration of AI intent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available Tier‑1 sources do not confirm AI intent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of AI features/tasks was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): An AI component is not confirmed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/app was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no verifiable demo.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Metrics/benchmarks were not found.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): Tier‑1: no tech description of the AI part was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The AI part is not confirmed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: CIPHER ERC‑20 token contract: 0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token parameters are verifiable onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 1
- What useful logic is onchain: protocol smart contracts (source code in the
cipher-corerepository). - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/Cipher-Protocol/cipher-core
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of protocol contract code is onchain logic beyond “just a token”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification that the blockchain is critical (docs/a description of the trust model are needed).
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has an ERC‑20 token, CIPHER, on the Ethereum network.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is verifiable onchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of payment for the service with the CIPHER token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of payment mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties for CIPHER was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no confirmed economic mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of the use of the CIPHER token for governance was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmation of governance mechanics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a Tier‑1 description of the role of the token, no conclusion can be drawn.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0xfc93e5844a2015ceef26bf6cae6689ff031509f4 | Onchain facts: the Cipher Protocol (CIPHER) token, Ethereum network, contract, decimals, max supply. |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/Cipher-Protocol/cipher-core | Tier‑1 codebase: the existence of circuits/ and contracts/, build and test instructions. |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cipher-protocol/ | Aggregator profile (for reference; not Tier‑1 proof). |
No comments to display
No comments to display