Skip to main content

DecentraMind

DecentraMind — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

DecentraMind — an AI/Agents project on Ethereum, token (symbol: DMIND).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project that describes a “Telegram aggregator bot” for several AI platforms (OpenAI, Gemini, Bedrock and others) via API keys (Tier‑1 website).
  • Who it’s for: Telegram users who need a unified interface to several AI services (claimed).
  • Why onchain/token: the ERC‑20 token DMIND on Ethereum is confirmed onchain; the website describes the token as a means of access to premium features of the bot (claim).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with the Telegram bot (as claimed on the website).
  2. The system does: routes requests to different AI providers/models via API keys (claim).
  3. The user gets: responses/analytics from the selected AI model (claim).
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — the DMIND token on Ethereum.
  5. Token role: the website claims that the token is used for access to premium features.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name DecentraMind
Also known as (aliases) DMIND, DecentraMind AI
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) DMIND
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x3Eb9c7ee5F72E51F61e832137719Fe8d1E53A2ce
Token model (token_type) utility (access)
Max supply 10 000 000 DMIND
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) The website claims that the token is used for access to premium features of the bot.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI platform aggregator in Telegram
Use‑case (use_case) unified interface to multiple AI models
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

DecentraMind describes the product as a Telegram bot that integrates several AI platforms via API keys and provides the user with a unified interface. Per the Tier‑1 source, the project also describes the DMIND token as a means of access to advanced features. A direct Tier‑1 link to a specific bot account for a demo was not identified in links_*, so the AI_2 flag remains 0.

Features/modules

  • Aggregator AI (claimed): integration of several AI providers into one Telegram bot.
  • Token access (claimed): DMIND is used for premium features.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user sends a request to the Telegram bot → receives a response from the selected AI provider (claim).
  • Scenario 2: a user interacts with the DMIND token → operations are visible onchain.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: Telegram; an Ethereum wallet — if performing onchain operations with the token.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: offchain Telegram bot/AI integrations; onchain DMIND token.
  • Participant roles: users, service operators, AI platform providers, Ethereum infrastructure.
  • Where logic runs: offchain — request routing and processing; onchain — the token.
  • Dependencies: external AI providers (API keys) and Ethereum infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: access to premium features of the bot (claim).
  • Supply parameters: max total supply 10 000 000 DMIND (onchain).
  • Who pays fees: users (gas in ETH) for transactions.
  • Where fees go: to Ethereum network validators/stakers (within the network mechanics).
  • Issuance/burn: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of offchain integrations (API keys) and the token.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: token on Ethereum mainnet; product descriptions are available on the website.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: described on the website (high‑level items).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: AI platforms via API keys (claimed).
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1 (other than claims).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The Tier‑1 website describes aggregation of several AI providers/models in a Telegram bot (claim).
  • What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token DMIND on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? The website specifies use of the token for premium features; the mechanics and the necessity of the token require clarification.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): absence of a direct link to the bot account/demo in links_*; many marketing formulations on the website without technical details.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the current product (aggregator), not just intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://decentramind.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of features.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Aggregates several AI platforms (OpenAI/Gemini/Bedrock and others) and provides access from Telegram.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://decentramind.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 source describes the purpose and the integration principle (via API keys).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A direct Tier‑1 link to the bot/demo (app/bot URL) is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Telegram channel/community in links_*, but not a bot account for a demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics were not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The architecture/model versions and a tech description of integrations are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient technical details.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: ERC‑20 token contract for DMIND: 0x3Eb9c7ee5F72E51F61e832137719Fe8d1E53A2ce
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x3Eb9c7ee5F72E51F61e832137719Fe8d1E53A2ce
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract and supply parameters are verifiable onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 (other than the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 confirmation of the key onchain logic of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has an ERC‑20 token, DMIND, on the Ethereum network.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x3Eb9c7ee5F72E51F61e832137719Fe8d1E53A2ce
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token is verifiable onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The website describes the DMIND token as a means of access to premium features within the bot.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://decentramind.bot/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): A Tier‑1 statement about the utility function of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Staking/incentives via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of specific mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance use of the token DMIND is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of a governance process.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient data on the necessity of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://decentramind.bot/ Tier‑1 description of the AI aggregator and a claim about the utility of the DMIND token.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x3Eb9c7ee5F72E51F61e832137719Fe8d1E53A2ce Onchain facts: DMIND token, Ethereum network, contract, max supply.
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/decentramind/ Aggregator profile (for reference).

No comments to display

Back to top