Skip to main content

Grok (grokcoin.co)

Grok (grokcoin.co) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Grok (grokcoin.co) — an AI project on the Ethereum network (ERC‑20), token (symbol: GROK).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a set of AI MVP (chatbot/tools) around crypto/contracts (per the project’s claim).
  • Who it’s for: users who need AI tools for questions about crypto/contracts (per the project’s claim).
  • Why onchain/token: the ERC‑20 token is confirmed onchain; per the project’s claim, the token is intended for interacting with the MVP in the ecosystem.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): GROK AI Draw — https://grokcoin.co/draw

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: accesses the tools/bot and asks questions or checks a contract (per the project’s claim).
  2. The system does: per the project’s claim, provides answers/explanations and performs “contract scanning” (risk checking).
  3. The user gets: an answer/summary/scan result (per the project’s claim).
  4. Where the blockchain is: onchain — the ERC‑20 token and public contract data.
  5. Token role: per the project’s claim, a utility token for interacting with the MVP in the ecosystem.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Grok (grokcoin.co)
Also known as (aliases) GROK
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) GROK
Category AI/Agents
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + governance)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) It is claimed that $GROK is a utility token for interacting with the MVP in the ecosystem.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI assistant + contract scanning
Use‑case (use_case) Q&A + smart contract checking
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the Tier‑1 documentation, the project describes a set of AI MVP, including “GROK GPT”, “AI Draw” and “Contract Scanning”. No open source code/product releases were found within this check; the assessment is based on the claimed materials and onchain facts of the token.

Features/modules

  • GROK GPT (per the project’s claim).
  • AI Draw (per the project’s claim).
  • Contract Scanning / Scanner (per the project’s claim).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user asks questions about crypto/contracts and receives an answer (per the project’s claim).
  • Scenario 2: a user pastes a token/contract address and receives a brief risk assessment (per the project’s claim).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the product/tools — see the project’s Tier‑1 docs (there is a public entry point for AI Draw).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (ERC‑20).
  • Fees: onchain Ethereum fees; product fees — not established.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 token contract; web/docs materials (per the project’s claim).
  • Participant roles: users.
  • Where logic runs: AI components — not established (probably offchain, requires re‑checking).
  • Dependencies: web interface/infrastructure — not established.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: it is claimed in Tier‑1 that $GROK is intended for interacting with the MVP in the ecosystem.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: not established (Tier‑1 does not contain a specific scheme for “what exactly is enabled by the token”).
  • Who pays fees: not established.
  • Where fees go: not established.
  • Issuance/burn: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: not established.
  • Treasury: not established.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • How protocol parameters change: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Keys/multisig: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Bug bounty: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Incidents: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Threat model: not established; for a “scanner”, it is important to double‑check the methodology and limitations of the analysis.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the documentation states that the product is in early beta (per the project’s claim).
  • Key releases/milestones: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Roadmap: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation found).
  • Partners: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Where it’s actually used: not established.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? AI components (chatbot/image generation/contract scanning) are claimed in the Tier‑1 documentation.
  • What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token and its contract are confirmed onchain.
  • Why is a token needed? It is claimed in Tier‑1 that the utility token is used for interacting with the MVP; the specific mandatory nature and consumption scheme of the token require re‑checking.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): no open quality metrics or architecture; Tier‑1 proof of onchain necessity, other than the token, is absent.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a Tier‑1 description of AI MVP features (this is more than intent).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies when there is only intent; here there is a description of components.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 description claims GROK GPT, AI Draw and contract scanning as AI MVP.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes the purpose of the components and the types of tasks.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 documentation gives a public URL for AI Draw.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/grok-overview/grok-mvps/grok-ai-draw
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation explicitly states “GROK AI Draw is available at https://grokcoin.co/draw”, which is a reproducible entry point.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0 Metrics: not found (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Context (version/date/how measured): not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation contains no verifiable quality metrics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): Architecture/versions of the AI components were not found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires technical details and artifacts (architecture/versions/boundaries), which are absent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The address and network are verifiable via an onchain explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0 What useful logic is onchain: No confirmation of onchain logic of the product (Tier‑1), other than the token, was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/ ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires onchain rules/accounting/access, not just the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0 “Replace the blockchain” test: no proof (Tier‑1) of onchain criticality for the AI MVP was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an argument “without the blockchain a property breaks down”, which is absent.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a claimed utility token, $GROK.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/ ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation mentions $GROK, and the contract is verifiable on Etherscan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): Mandatory payment with the token for access to the service is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit payment mechanism “with the token for the service”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not confirmed per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The available documentation contains no description of incentives/slashing/staking as a protocol mechanism.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance use of the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of governance/voting.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0 Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established (no Tier‑1 confirmation identified).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://doc.grokcoin.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit argument for replaceability.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://doc.grokcoin.co/ Tier‑1 description of the claimed AI MVP (GROK GPT / AI Draw / Contract Scanning) and mention of the utility token $GROK.
Tier‑1 https://doc.grokcoin.co/grok-overview/grok-mvps/grok-ai-draw Tier‑1 confirmation of a public demo URL for AI Draw (https://grokcoin.co/draw).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x742f6f19cccf9b4115b08c104bb308196c0fa224 Onchain fact of the ERC‑20 token contract on the Ethereum network.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a public App/Demo URL for GROK GPT / Contract Scanning” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top