Skip to main content

GaiAI

GaiAI (GAIX) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

GaiAI — an AI/Agents | Consumer project on BNB Smart Chain, token (symbol: GAIX).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a “DeAI Knowledge Service Layer” and a creative AI agent for on-chain visual creativity (generation, rights attribution, co‑creation and revenue sharing — per Tier‑1).
  • Who it’s for: creators/users who generate and use visual assets (per the project’s positioning).
  • Why onchain/token: Tier‑1 claims on-chain accounting/issuance of visual assets and confirms the GAIX token on BNB Smart Chain; no Tier‑1 utility of the GAIX token (payments/staking/governance) was found.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: generates/evolves visual content via AI agents (per the project’s description).
  2. The system does: links the content to on-chain assets and to the chain of participants’ contributions (as claimed by the project).
  3. The user gets: a visual asset + attribution/the possibility of participating in the “on-chain visual economy” (per the Tier‑1 description).
  4. Where the blockchain is: Tier‑1 claims “recorded on-chain”/“on-chain images”; at the same time, only the existence of the GAIX token (contract) is verifiable via the links in this card.
  5. Token role (if any): the existence of the GAIX token is confirmed; the specific utility of the token is not described in Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name GaiAI
Also known as (aliases) GAIX; GaiAI (GAIX)
Logo (logo) ../assets/108_gaiai_logo.ico
Token symbol (ticker) GAIX
Category AI/Agents | Consumer
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) 2025-11-07
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xc12eFb9e4A1A753e7f6523482C569793C2271dbB
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1,000,000,000 GAIX
Issuance mintable (capped; onlyOwner)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) the contract has MAX_SUPPLY = 1B and mint() (onlyOwner)
Governance —
Admins/keys owner (Ownable2Step; mint onlyOwner)
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agents for image generation/evolution
Use‑case (use_case) on-chain visual creation + attribution/revenue sharing
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 1
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

GaiAI is a project that positions itself as the “First DeAI Knowledge Service Layer” and as a decentralized creative AI agent for an on-chain visual economy: generation of visual assets, recording of participants’ contributions, rights attribution and revenue sharing.

Tier‑1 (the project’s website/blog/docs) also claims that the ecosystem provides a single interface for using the “latest AI”, collects human‑judge model comparison data and keeps a history of AI interactions with indexing/search. At the same time, the addresses of the onchain contracts (other than the token) are not provided in Tier‑1 — therefore, in the onchain part below we separate the “project’s claim” from the “verifiable artifact”.

Features/modules

  • AI generation of visual content: the project describes itself as an “image generator”/AI agent‑driven system.
  • On-chain assets and attribution: “every creation is recorded on-chain”; on-chain visual economy (per Tier‑1 claims).
  • Data for improving models: “human‑judge model comparison data” and a ranked history of AI interactions (per Tier‑1 claims).
  • Onchain artifact (verifiable): the GAIX token (BEP‑20) with verified contract source code.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario: a user generates an image/variations and receives an “asset” within the on-chain visual economy (per the Tier‑1 description).
  • Scenario: a user participates in interactions (generation/downloads/derivative works), which, according to the project’s claim, lead to on-chain attribution and rewards.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (for example, MetaMask) and some BNB for fees on the BNB Smart Chain network.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (mainnet).
  • Fees: BSC network fees for onchain transactions (transfers/approve, etc.).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components (confirmed): the GAIX token contract (BEP‑20) on the BNB Smart Chain network.
  • Participant roles: users/creators; token holders; the owner of the token contract (owner) with the right to mint() within MAX_SUPPLY.
  • Where logic runs: Tier‑1 claims on-chain recording of creations/attribution, but provides no contract addresses other than the token — verifiable only at the token level.
  • Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain infrastructure (RPC/explorer, etc.).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: no Tier‑1 source describing the utility of GAIX (payments/staking/governance) was found.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: — (not confirmed by Tier‑1).
  • Who pays fees: BNB Smart Chain users for onchain operations with the token (transfer/approve, etc.).
  • Where fees go: BSC fees (to the network validators); no data on GaiAI protocol fees was found in Tier‑1.
  • Issuance/burn: the contract is mintable (onlyOwner) with a hard limit MAX_SUPPLY = 1,000,000,000 * 10^18.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: the token contract shows the issuance limited by a cap; other incentives/staking are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (no Tier‑1 found).
  • Treasury: — (no Tier‑1 found).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (no Tier‑1 on the project’s governance process was found).
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: the owner of the token contract (owner) has the right to mint() within MAX_SUPPLY (centralization risk).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (no audit report in links_*).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: — (no Tier‑1 found).
  • Threat model (minimum per Tier‑1):
    • a mintable token (onlyOwner) → risk of centralized issuance up to the cap;
    • the absence of a confirmed Tier‑1 utility → the necessity of the token in the product requires additional verification.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the GAIX token is active on the BNB Smart Chain network (there are transactions/transfers; the contract is on the network); the project’s blog describes a testnet and “on-chain images”.
  • Key milestones: creation of the GAIX token contract — 2025-11-07 (timestamp in the creation transaction); publication about the testnet and metrics — 2025-11-29.
  • Roadmap: — (no Tier‑1 roadmap found).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: EVM wallets and BNB Smart Chain infrastructure (at the token level).
  • Partners: — (no Tier‑1 found).
  • Where it’s actually used: — (no Tier‑1 cases/demos found).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 describes the project as a creative AI agent / image generator: AI agents generate and evolve visual works; the collection of human‑judge model comparison data is also claimed.
  • What is truly onchain? The GAIX token on the BNB Smart Chain network is confirmed (contract, max supply, creation transaction); additionally, Tier‑1 claims “on-chain images” and “recorded on-chain” for creations.
  • Why is a token needed? Tier‑1 does not describe the utility of the GAIX token, so the necessity of the token is not confirmed.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): token‑washing (no Tier‑1 on the token’s utility); onchain‑washing risk (no contract addresses for the on-chain assets other than the token). What to double‑check: the “Launch app” demo/guide, the on-chain asset contracts, tokenomics/utility, governance/audits.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present (partially) 1
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies as “intent only”; Tier‑1 contains a description of what the AI does (AI_1=1), therefore AI_0=0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents/an “image generator” generate and evolve visual works; the project builds an on-chain visual economy around these assets.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://gitbook.gaiai.io/ ; https://www.gaiai.io/post/why-is-gai-ai-building-an-on-chain-creative-asset-dao
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 description of the AI functionality (what exactly the AI does), albeit without a deep architecture/versions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a Tier‑1 demo/guide/example of “what you can touch” — not found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a demo, the operability of the AI part cannot be confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No Tier‑1 metrics/benchmarks were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 technical description/architecture/model versions were found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without documentation, the AI implementation cannot be verified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: GAIX token contract: 0xc12eFb9e4A1A753e7f6523482C569793C2271dbB
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xc12eFb9e4A1A753e7f6523482C569793C2271dbB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract and its parameters (max supply, verified source) are available in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: on-chain assets/attribution: “every creation is recorded on-chain”, “on-chain images”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.gaiai.io/ ; https://www.gaiai.io/post/why-is-gai-ai-building-an-on-chain-creative-asset-dao ; https://www.gaiai.io/post/gai-ai-testnet-new-on-chain-creative-era
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 claims on-chain recording of creations/assets; at the same time, the contract addresses (other than the token) are not disclosed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: Tier‑1 does not show that the product breaks without onchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): only the token is confirmed; the criticality of onchain for the “knowledge layer” is not proven.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, GAIX (BEP‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xc12eFb9e4A1A753e7f6523482C569793C2271dbB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract exists and is tracked by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the “payment for the service” utility of GAIX is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 source describing a payment utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentives/staking/collateral via GAIX are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of an incentive mechanism.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the governance utility of the GAIX token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 source on voting/a DAO.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): in the absence of a confirmed Tier‑1 utility, the token is considered replaceable until evidence of its necessity appears.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 on the necessity of the token (payments/staking/governance) was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.gaiai.io/ “DeAI Knowledge Service Layer”; a single interface for the “latest AI”; “on-chain images” and a history of AI interactions are claimed
Tier‑1 https://gitbook.gaiai.io/ decentralized creative AI agent; on-chain visual creation, rights attribution and revenue sharing
Tier‑1 https://www.gaiai.io/post/why-is-gai-ai-building-an-on-chain-creative-asset-dao on-chain assets (“every creation is recorded on-chain”) and AI agents for generating/evolving visual works
Tier‑1 https://www.gaiai.io/post/gai-ai-testnet-new-on-chain-creative-era testnet metrics (600k+ participants, 7,000,000+ on-chain images) and plans (multi-modal/video-native generation, DAO)
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xc12eFb9e4A1A753e7f6523482C569793C2271dbB the GAIX token on the BNB Smart Chain network; max supply 1,000,000,000; verified source; the presence of mint() (onlyOwner) and MAX_SUPPLY (in the source code)
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xe8993cbc429186a3aabc4a5b638325760a279ceeae57f80b73e823415aa593ac timestamp of the token contract creation: 2025-11-07 (Nov-07-2025 12:07:50 PM UTC)
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “demo/guide: what exactly you can touch (Launch app) and where it is available” was found.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “technical description/architecture/model versions (AI_4)” was found.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “GAIX utility/tokenomics (payments/staking/governance)” was found.