Skip to main content

INFINIT

INFINIT (IN) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

INFINIT — an AI/Agents project: an “agentic DeFi ecosystem” (per the docs), token (symbol: IN).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a set of products that let you discover and execute DeFi strategies “in one workflow”: an AI chat/intelligence (discovery), “Prompt‑to‑DeFi” (assembling a strategy from text) and “Strategies” (execution).
  • Who it’s for: users who find it hard to assemble multi-step DeFi operations by hand, and “strategy creators” who want to publish strategies.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is the execution environment itself for DeFi transactions (the wallet remains non‑custodial); the IN token is used for staking (a share of protocol fees), access to premium features and governance (per the docs).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): public web products (chat/prompt/strategies) and documentation on the token/governance.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: connects a wallet and formulates a task (for example, “what to do with ETH?”) or describes a strategy in text.
  2. The system does: analyzes the context (portfolio/preferences), builds a multi-step plan and prepares transactions.
  3. The user gets: a preview/simulation and then confirms the transactions; execution happens from the wallet (non‑custodial).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the actual swaps/lending/looping, etc. are executed onchain on the supported networks; the IN token is an onchain asset.
  5. Token role: IN — staking for a share of protocol fees, access/limits/privileges and governance rights (per the docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name INFINIT
Also known as (aliases) Infinit Labs; INFINIT Intelligence; Prompt‑to‑DeFi; INFINIT Strategies; $IN
Logo (logo) ../assets/102_infinit_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) IN
Category AI/Agents
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) 2025 (documents/roadmap Q3 2025)
Project status (status) active (products available)
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x61fac5f038515572d6f42d4bcb6b581642753d50
Token model (token_type) utility (staking + governance)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 (hard cap, non‑inflationary; per the docs/whitepaper)
Issuance fixed supply (no burn; circulating grows per vesting, without exceeding the cap)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) 20% core contributors; 25.5% investors; 49.5% community+ecosystem; 5% airdrop; initial circulating 26.3% (263M).
Governance progressive governance (via IN stakers; in phases)
Admins/keys the token on Ethereum is a proxy (admin upgrades are possible)
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) Init Capital Ltd. (legal entity in the MiCAR white paper)
Funding (investors/funding) USD 6M raised (MiCAR white paper)
AI component (ai_component) agent swarm + NL prompt-to-DeFi
Use‑case (use_case) discover + execute DeFi strategies
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 3 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In its Tier‑1 documentation, INFINIT describes itself as an “agentic DeFi ecosystem” where AI agents help the user go from discovering opportunities (wallet‑based personalization and analysis) to creating a strategy in natural language and executing multi-step operations.

The key product bundle (Tier‑1):

  • INFINIT Intelligence — a chat/discovery engine that analyzes the wallet and issues recommendations.
  • Prompt‑to‑DeFi — assembling a strategy from a text description (early access/phases).
  • INFINIT Strategies — “one workflow execution” with a preview of the steps and confirmation of transactions.

The project emphasizes the non‑custodial model: agents “prepare” transactions, but the assets stay with the user and execution happens onchain.

Features/modules

  • INFINIT Intelligence (chat): personal recommendations based on the wallet/context.
  • Prompt‑to‑DeFi: generation/construction of multi-step strategies from text + simulation/saving/sharing.
  • INFINIT Strategies: execution of “1‑click” multi-step strategies, with a transparent preview of transactions.
  • Agent Swarm: a set of specialized DeFi agents + agentic RAG/ReAct/self‑reflection (per the docs).
  • Data Stream: aggregation of onchain/offchain data for recommendations.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user asks a question in Intelligence → receives personal recommendations → launches execution via Strategies.
  • Scenario 2: a user describes a strategy in text in Prompt‑to‑DeFi → receives a set of steps/transactions → simulates → executes.
  • Scenario 3: an IN staker gets access to premium features/limits and participates in governance.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a web3 wallet (non‑custodial); access to the INFINIT web products.
  • Network/chain: depends on the strategy and the supported protocols; the IN token (ERC‑20) — Ethereum (and a contract on BSC is claimed).
  • Fees: network fees of the selected chains when executing transactions + possible protocol fees; fee discounts are claimed for IN stakers (per the docs).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web client(s) (chat/prompt/strategies); offchain orchestration of agents; onchain execution of transactions via the user’s wallet; the IN token as an access/coordination/governance layer.
  • Participant roles: users; strategy creators; IN stakers.
  • Where logic runs: AI coordination — offchain; final actions — onchain (DeFi protocols and networks).
  • Dependencies: RPC of the networks/DeFi protocols; data sources (data stream); token contracts (ERC‑20 proxy).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • IN utility (Tier‑1): staking → a share of protocol fees; access to premium features (discounts/limits/priority/gated); governance rights for stakers.
  • Supply (Tier‑1): hard cap 1,000,000,000; non‑inflationary; no burn; circulating grows per vesting.
  • Distribution (Tier‑1): 20% core contributors (4y vest), 25.5% investors (1.5y), 49.5% community+ecosystem (4y), 5% airdrop (unlock at TGE).
  • Initial circulating (Tier‑1): 263M (26.3%) at launch: 5% airdrop + 21.3% community+ecosystem.
  • Who pays fees: users pay the gas of the selected networks when executing strategies; protocol fees are distributed (partially) to stakers and/or creators (per the governance framework).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: IN stakers (progressive governance), with coordination/introduction in phases.
  • How protocol parameters change (Tier‑1): governance roadmap in phases: fee governance (Q3 2025), onboarding of new agents (Q4 2025), inclusion of strategies (Q1 2026).
  • Where: governance framework (docs).
  • Keys/multisig: — (not described in the extracted Tier‑1).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: there is a separate PeckShield report for IN Staking (link in links_*).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of errors in DeFi integrations/transactions; risks of proxy upgrades of the token; risks of offchain agents (errors/hallucinations) — mitigated by the fact that the user confirms transactions.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: products are available (web services); Prompt‑to‑DeFi is described as “early access” and is developing in phases.
  • Key releases/milestones: milestones/plans and the Q3 2025 token launch are described in the MiCAR white paper and the roadmap docs.
  • Roadmap: see links_* (roadmap overview).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: many chains/protocols are claimed (EVM networks and others); wallet integrations and platform integrations are described as a roadmap direction.
  • Partners: — (no Tier‑1 confirmation recorded).
  • Where it’s actually used: Tier‑1 confirms working web products and the general “discovery → execution” mechanism.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? a multi‑agent “swarm” coordinates strategy assembly and recommendations; agentic RAG, ReAct reasoning, self‑reflection and routing between several LLMs are mentioned.
  • What is truly onchain? execution of DeFi actions happens onchain from the user’s wallet; the IN token is an onchain asset (ERC‑20 proxy).
  • Why is a token needed? staking for a share of protocol fees/access/limits and governance rights.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing is moderate (there are working products, but no public model quality metrics); token‑washing is checked via the fact of “whether it can be used without IN”; what to double‑check: the exact implementation of staking/fee distribution and the proxy admin setup.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 3
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI products are described as working (chat/prompt/strategies), so “intent only” does not apply.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 is used only if AI_1..AI_4 = 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents analyze the context and translate natural language into executable DeFi actions/strategies.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/ ; https://storage.googleapis.com/infinit-asset-public/infinit-landing/documents/INFINIT_MiCAR_WHITE_PAPER.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the agent swarm and prompt‑to‑DeFi.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): public web products are available: chat (Intelligence), Prompt‑to‑DeFi and Strategies.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/ (contains links to https://app.infinit.tech/...)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs give direct links to the working applications.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): public quality metrics for the AI part are not recorded in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Agent Swarm, multi‑LLM routing and Data Stream are described as elements of the AI infrastructure.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/ (section “INFINIT AI Agent Infrastructure”)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a technical description of the components, although without details of models/versions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: IN (ERC‑20) 0x61fac5f038515572d6f42d4bcb6b581642753d50
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x61fac5f038515572d6f42d4bcb6b581642753d50 ; https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/in-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer and the docs confirm the token address on ETH.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: beyond the token, specific onchain contracts of the INFINIT protocol are not recorded in this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/contracts beyond the token we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 1
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain there would be no execution of DeFi strategies (the core value is transactions and interaction with protocols).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/ ; https://storage.googleapis.com/infinit-asset-public/infinit-landing/documents/INFINIT_MiCAR_WHITE_PAPER.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes “prompt → onchain transactions” and the execution layer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, IN.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/in-token ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x61fac5f038515572d6f42d4bcb6b581642753d50
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token and its address are explicitly listed in the docs and confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): IN is a mandatory token for paying for services.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 focuses on staking/access/governance; the mandatory nature of payment in IN is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): staking IN yields a share of protocol fees and improves access/limits.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-utility ; https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/in-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes protocol fees via staking and privileges.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): governance rights are granted to IN stakers (fee params, onboarding agents, inclusion strategies).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/governance/governance-framework ; https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the governance framework describes the voting areas and phases.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of IN is neither proven nor refuted by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is utility and governance, but no replaceability test.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.infinit.tech/ Tier‑1 description of the products (Intelligence / Prompt‑to‑DeFi / Strategies) and the AI infrastructure.
Tier‑1 https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/in-token Max supply 1B, non‑inflationary, token allocation + contract addresses.
Tier‑1 https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-utility Utility of IN: staking→fees, access/limits, governance; “attention-based tokenomics” (plans).
Tier‑1 https://docs.infinit.tech/tokenomics/token-distribution Initial circulating supply 263M (26.3%).
Tier‑1 https://docs.infinit.tech/governance/governance-framework Governance roadmap in phases (Q3 2025/Q4 2025/Q1 2026) and decision areas.
Tier‑1 https://storage.googleapis.com/infinit-asset-public/infinit-landing/documents/INFINIT_MiCAR_WHITE_PAPER.pdf MiCAR white paper: description of the project/token, supply 1B, allocations, milestones, raised $6M.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x61fac5f038515572d6f42d4bcb6b581642753d50 Onchain fact of the IN token on Ethereum (proxy, supply at the time of the check).
Tier‑2 https://github.com/infinit-xyz/in-token-contract-audit/blob/main/PeckShield-Audit-Report-IN-Staking-v1.0.pdf Audit of the staking contracts (a reference audit artifact).

No comments to display

Back to top