Skip to main content

Solidus AI Tech

Solidus AI Tech / AITECH (AITECH) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Solidus AI Tech — an AI/Compute project: products around AI infrastructure (compute marketplace, AI marketplace, agent builder) and the AITECH utility token.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an ecosystem of products for access to compute and AI tools (compute marketplace, AI marketplace, AI agent tools), “underpinned” by the AITECH token.
  • Who it’s for: users/teams that need GPU/compute and AI tools, and the community participating in staking and votes.
  • Why onchain/token: the AITECH token is used as a utility asset for access and settlement inside the products, as well as for staking and DAO votes (per the docs).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the aitech.io website and the official documentation, including pages on the products and staking.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user chooses a product (compute marketplace / agent forge / AI marketplace / AvaChat, etc.).
  2. The user interacts with the product via a web interface and/or smart contracts (for example, staking/DAO).
  3. The user gets access to compute/AI tools and, optionally, participates in staking and governance.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AITECH token and the related mechanics (staking, DAO voting) — onchain (BSC).
  5. Token role: access to products/transactions in the ecosystem, rewards for staking, voting power in the DAO (per the docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Solidus AI Tech
Also known as (aliases) AITECH ecosystem; Solidus AITECH
Logo (logo) ../assets/106_solidus-ai-tech_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AITECH
Category AI/Compute
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + staking + governance)
Max supply 1,986,227,423.66 AITECH (Max Total Supply per BscScan)
Issuance deflationary model with burns + vesting/unlocks (per the docs)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) access to products, staking rewards and voting power; a deflationary model with burns is claimed (per the docs)
Governance DAO mechanics via AITECH (per the docs)
Admins/keys —
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) there are public team pages/descriptions on the website
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) compute marketplace + AI agents + AI marketplace
Use‑case (use_case) access to compute + AI tools
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Solidus AI Tech describes an ecosystem of products that includes a “Compute Marketplace” (access to compute), an “AI Marketplace” (access to AI solutions), “Agent Forge” (no‑code creation/deployment of agents) and other products. The AITECH token is described as an “AI infrastructure utility token” that is used for access/transactions within the ecosystem, as well as for staking and DAO votes.

Features/modules

  • Compute Marketplace: access/transactions for renting compute (per the docs: “Transact on Compute Marketplace”).
  • Agent Forge: no‑code creation/deployment of AI agents (per the website and docs).
  • AI Marketplace: access to AI solutions (per the docs).
  • AvaChat: an AI agent chat assistant (per the docs).
  • Staking: staking of AITECH with rewards and voting power (per the docs).
  • DAO Governance: votes/proposals via AITECH (per the docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (compute): a user rents compute via the marketplace → gets access to GPU/compute resources.
  • Scenario 2 (agents): a user creates/deploys an agent in Agent Forge → automates tasks/integrations.
  • Scenario 3 (staking/governance): a holder stakes AITECH → receives rewards and voting power for the DAO.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet and AITECH for onchain actions (staking/governance, etc.), an account/access to the web products.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (the AITECH token is BEP‑20).
  • Fees: BSC network fees for transactions (staking/vote/transfer); fees/payments inside the products — per their terms.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the AITECH smart contracts and the staking/voting mechanics, web products (marketplaces/agent tools), the infrastructure of compute providers (offchain).
  • Participant roles: compute users/clients, compute providers, token holders/stakers, DAO participants.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — token/staking/voting; offchain — compute/marketplaces/AI services.
  • Dependencies: BSC, the web infrastructure of the products.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: AITECH “facilitates access” to the ecosystem products; it is used for transactions in Agent Forge/marketplaces and for AvaChat (per the docs “What is AITECH Token?”).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the token is the entry asset for access/transactions in the ecosystem and for governance/staking; part of the utility is theoretically replaceable with fiat/stablecoins, but the Tier‑1 design is built around AITECH.
  • Who pays fees: product users and holders performing onchain actions.
  • Where fees go: network fees — to the network; some of the mechanics include burns and staking rewards (per the docs).
  • Issuance/burn: the docs describe a deflationary burn mechanism; there are also allocation/vesting/supply metrics charts (tokenomics page).
  • Incentive mechanisms: staking rewards; voting power increases with a longer lock (staking doc).
  • Distribution/vesting: the tokenomics page has an allocation distribution and a vesting release schedule (as images) and a note about team unlocks from 2025‑03‑28.
  • Treasury: DAO/governance is mentioned, but the specifics of treasury addresses/execution rules are not established per Tier‑1.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: a DAO governance platform + token-based voting mechanics (per the docs).
  • How protocol parameters change: votes/proposals via aitech.io/vote; the terms state that results are advisory unless executed automatically via smart contracts.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: https://aitech.io/vote/ (Tier‑1 as a portal, described in the Terms).
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: the docs claim “Security Audit: CertiK & Hacken”; there is a Hacken audits page; the exact PDF reports/dates need to be confirmed against the primary sources of the reports.
  • Bug bounty: — (no Tier‑1 page found in links_*).
  • Incidents: no Tier‑1 postmortems were found.
  • Threat model: smart contract risks (immutable), bridge/integration risks, centralization risks of the offchain parts (marketplace/compute).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: an active ecosystem of products and a token on BSC.
  • Key releases/milestones: tokenomics docs: team unlocks from 2025‑03‑28 (36‑month vesting).
  • Roadmap: there is a roadmap section on the website (Tier‑1 page) — https://aitech.io/#roadmap.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: staking/DAO on BSC; products (Agent Forge / marketplaces).
  • Partners: the website shows partners/integrations (marketing blocks), but their terms are not verified by Tier‑1.
  • Where it’s actually used: Tier‑1 product pages and docs.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? products around AI (AI agents, AI marketplace, AvaChat) and compute for AI workloads.
  • What is truly onchain? the AITECH token, staking and DAO governance mechanics.
  • Why is a token needed? the token is described as a utility for access/transactions within the ecosystem + governance + staking rewards.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — medium (no Tier‑1 quality metrics/benchmarks); onchain‑washing — medium (some functions are offchain); token‑washing — low/medium (the utility is described, but replaceability is partially possible).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI products are a current part of the ecosystem, not only intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): a set of AI products and transactions is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents/chats/a marketplace of AI solutions and compute for AI workloads (what the AI does at the product level).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech, https://aitech.io
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 lists the products and their purpose.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): public docs and product pages (Agent Forge/marketplaces) as artifacts of a real product.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io, https://aitech.io
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are public artifacts and documentation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 AI quality metrics were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is product documentation, but no technical description of the models/versions/inference stack.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient for a technical verification of the AI core.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: AITECH token: 0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the contract and the network are confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: staking pools and the DAO governance mechanics (voting power, advisory/auto execution) are described in the docs as onchain interactions.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/Staking, https://docs.aitech.io/docs/DAO-Governance
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is onchain logic beyond “just a token”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: compute/marketplaces could work on a subscription/fiat basis; onchain criticality in the sense of “the product breaks without it” is not proven by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 records that the token is important for the design, but does not prove that the blockchain is irreplaceable for the core service.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, AITECH.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is verifiable in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AITECH is used for transactions/access in the products (Agent Forge, marketplaces, compute).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly lists “Transact on …” and access to products via the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): staking rewards and lock pools (including hybrid/compound), plus increased voting power with a longer lock.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/Staking
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the incentive mechanism is described explicitly.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): voting power in DAO governance is based on held/staked AITECH; results are advisory unless executed automatically.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/DAO-Governance, https://docs.aitech.io/docs/Staking
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the governance mechanics and the dependence of voting power on the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): part of the utility (access/payment) is conceptually replaceable with fiat/stablecoins, but the Tier‑1 design of the ecosystem is still tied to AITECH.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the absence of proof that it is “impossible without the token” ⇒ we conservatively consider replaceability high.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.aitech.io/docs/What-is-aitech AITECH utility: access to products, staking, DAO governance; list of products
Tier‑1 https://aitech.io what you can touch: public pages of the ecosystem products
Tier‑1 https://docs.aitech.io/docs/Staking staking mechanics and the link between voting power and the term/pool
Tier‑1 https://docs.aitech.io/docs/DAO-Governance DAO governance rules (advisory/auto execution), voting power based on held/staked
Tier‑1 https://docs.aitech.io/docs/AITECH-Tokenomics allocation/vesting/supply metrics (including the note about team unlocks from 2025‑03‑28) and the deflationary model
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x2d060ef4d6bf7f9e5edde373ab735513c0e4f944 the token contract and max total supply
Tier‑1 https://hacken.io/audits/solidus-ai-tech/ the fact of external audits (Hacken page); report details require the primary PDF sources

No comments to display

Back to top