LimeWire
LimeWire (LMWR / LimeWire Network) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
LimeWire — an AI/Other project on Ethereum, token (symbol: LMWR).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: the LimeWire ecosystem: AI‑powered file sharing (uploading/manipulating/sharing files) + the
LMWRtoken as a utility for payments/rewards and staking; LimeWire Network (decentralized storage / DePIN) is positioned separately. - Who it’s for: users/content creators and teams who need secure file sharing and AI tools; network participants (staking/pools).
- Why onchain/token:
LMWRis used as the payment/reward token of the ecosystem and as an asset for staking; the onchain part is confidently confirmed in the sources at the token level (ERC‑20). - What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the
limewire.comweb‑app (upload/edit/share; AI‑powered).
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: uploads a file to the web‑app and shares a link/access (or uses AI tools for creation/editing).
- The system does: provides file storage/transfer and (per the description) AI manipulation/optimization.
- The user gets: secure transfer/collaboration and AI features (creator tools).
- Where the blockchain is: the ERC‑20 token
LMWRon Ethereum is confirmed; the broader onchain infrastructure (storage network) is described but not confirmed by addresses in Tier‑1 sources. - Token role:
LMWR— payments/rewards in the ecosystem and staking via Web3 pools.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | LimeWire |
| Also known as (aliases) | LMWR, LimeWire Token, LimeWire Network |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/97_limewire_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | LMWR |
| Category | AI/Other |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2023-03-24 |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88 |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (payments + staking + rewards) |
| Max supply | 633,045,269 |
| Issuance | burn |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | utility for payments/rewards + staking pools; burn programs have been conducted. |
| Governance | company |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI content creation + AI file manipulation |
| Use‑case (use_case) | AI file sharing + creator tools |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://limewire.com/ |
| App / Demo | https://limewire.com/ |
| Docs | https://lmwr.com/ |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | https://blog.limewire.com/ |
| Whitepaper | https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf |
| Roadmap | https://lmwr.com/timeline |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88 |
| X | https://twitter.com/limewire |
| Discord | https://lmwr.co/discord |
| Telegram | https://t.me/limewire |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | https://skynet.certik.com/projects/limewire |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/limewire-token |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/limewire/ |
General project overview
In Tier‑1 sources, LimeWire describes two interrelated layers:
- LimeWire (limewire.com) — a web platform for uploading/editing/sharing files with an emphasis on security (end‑to‑end encryption is claimed) and AI features (positioned as AI‑powered).
- LimeWire Token / ecosystem (lmwr.com) — the
LMWRtoken, which is used as a utility for payments/rewards and staking within the LimeWire setup.
Additionally, LimeWire Network (limewire.network) is highlighted — a “decentralized storage network / DePIN”, where validators, staking/slashing and S3 compatibility are mentioned. Per Tier‑1, this is described at the product/positioning level; the address‑level onchain implementation of the network is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources (apart from the LMWR token itself).
Features/modules
- AI‑powered file sharing: upload/edit/share (web‑app).
- AI Studio / creator tools: AI tools for creating/editing content (the whitepaper describes them as part of the “File Sharing & AI Platform”).
- LMWR utility: payments/rewards and staking pools.
- LimeWire Network (DePIN storage): decentralized file/object storage (S3‑compatible) — positioned as an infrastructure layer, “powered by $LMWR”.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1 (user): uploads files to LimeWire → shares them with others → uses AI features for manipulation/optimization.
- Scenario 2 (token holder): uses
LMWRin a Web3 pool (staking) → receives rewards (per the description in the whitepaper). - Scenario 3 (network participant): participates as a storage provider/node operator (per LimeWire Network) → receives
LMWRrewards (as claimed).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: access to the
limewire.comweb‑app; for onchain operations — a web3 wallet. - Network/chain: primary —
Ethereum(ERC‑20LMWR). - Fees: Ethereum fees for onchain operations; offchain operations depend on the pricing/payment within the ecosystem.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the LimeWire web‑app; the
LMWRtoken contract (ERC‑20) on Ethereum; staking pools (described, but Tier‑1 contract/pool addresses are not listed); LimeWire Network (described as a storage protocol). - Participant roles: users/creators; token holders; stakers; (claimed) storage providers/node operators/validators.
- Where logic runs: AI/file operations — offchain in the web‑app; the token and (part of) the incentive mechanics — onchain.
- Dependencies: Ethereum for the token; a multichain model of the token is mentioned in the timeline; the storage layer (LimeWire Network).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility:
LMWRis described as the payments/rewards token for LimeWire (file sharing + AI platform) and as the power token of LimeWire Network; staking via Web3 pools is also described. - Protocol necessity drivers: payments/rewards and staking are tied to the
LMWRtoken (Tier‑1 whitepaper). - Who pays fees: participants during onchain operations (gas in Ethereum).
- Where fees go: details of fee/revenue distribution without contract addresses are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- Issuance/burn: the timeline describes burn programs; Etherscan lists the max total supply.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: staking pools + rewards; staking/slashing mechanics are claimed for LimeWire Network (without address‑level verification).
- Distribution/vesting: —.
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: company (per Tier‑1 sources on the token/product).
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: a CertiK link is present in
links_*(check that it matches the contracts). - Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks of centralized control of the product (web‑app) and a lack of address‑level transparency for the “network” layers; for the token — standard ERC‑20 risks and bridge/multichain risks.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the web‑app is active; the
LMWRtoken is on Ethereum mainnet. - Key releases/milestones: the timeline on
lmwr.comlists product releases (AI Studio/creator assistant, staking pools, multichain). - Roadmap: there is a timeline/roadmap at
lmwr.com/timeline.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: the timeline mentions LMWR on Base/BNB Smart Chain and integrations with storage (BNB Greenfield); details of onchain integrations require address‑level verification.
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: the file sharing web‑app is confirmed; token utilities/staking are described in Tier‑1.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Tier‑1 sources describe an AI‑powered platform for file sharing and creator tools (content creation/editing).
- What is truly onchain? Tier‑1 confirms the ERC‑20 token
LMWRon Ethereum; the rest of the “network” onchain logic is described at a high level. - Why is a token needed?
LMWRis described as the payments/rewards token of the ecosystem and as a staking token (pools). - Red flags (based on the information found): onchain‑washing (if a “decentralized network” is claimed without addresses/contracts/metrics); token‑washing (a utility list without onchain verifiability); what to double‑check: staking pool addresses and real onchain operations related to LimeWire Network.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | medium | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the AI component is confirmed as a product (AI_1/AI_2), so “intent only” does not apply.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 is set only when AI_1..AI_4 = 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): AI‑powered file sharing + AI content creation/editing tools.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://limewire.com/, https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the AI tools as part of the platform and provides a product‑level wording.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): an upload/edit/share web‑app is available at
limewire.com, claimed to be “AI‑powered”. - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://limewire.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a reproducible Tier‑1 product interface (“what you can touch”).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://limewire.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no reproducible quality metrics for the AI models/versions in Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no detailed technical description of the AI architecture/model versions was found in Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the document describes the product and the utility, but without sufficient technical details on the models/architecture.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88, https://etherscan.io/address/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token and the creation tx are verifiable on the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: LimeWire Network and staking/slashing are described, but the address‑level onchain implementation (contracts/network) is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://limewire.network/, https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/contracts this remains a description of a product/plan, not verifiable onchain logic.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: the file sharing web‑app can work without a blockchain; the criticality of onchain for the core of the product is not proven.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://limewire.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 does not prove that the key property is impossible without a blockchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token,
LMWR(ERC‑20). - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract is publicly confirmed by the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line):
LMWRis used for payments/rewards on the LimeWire platform and in LimeWire Network. - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the token’s utility as a payment/reward method.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line):
LMWRcan be staked in Web3 staking pools; staking/slashing mechanics are claimed for the network layer. - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf, https://limewire.network/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes staking pools; details of the slashing mechanics come without addresses.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): a token‑governance role of
LMWRis not confirmed (the timeline separately mentions a future governance token for the Network). - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/timeline
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): a mention of a future governance token does not prove a current governance role of LMWR.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token is neither proven nor refuted per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the utility is described, but the “irreplaceability” argument is not formalized.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://limewire.com/ | Tier‑1 web‑app: upload/edit/share; positioned as AI‑powered (AI_2 demo‑sync). |
| Tier‑1 | https://lmwr.com/downloads/LimeWire%20Whitepaper%201.0.pdf | Tier‑1 description of the ecosystem: AI platform + LMWR utility (payments/rewards, staking pools). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88 | Onchain fact: LMWR ERC‑20 (max total supply, contract). |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/address/0x628a3b2e302c7e896acc432d2d0dd22b6cb9bc88 | Creation tx/contract deployment date (token launch/creation date: 2023‑03‑24). |
| Tier‑1 | https://lmwr.com/timeline | Tier‑1 timeline: staking pools, multichain, burn programs, roadmap. |
| Tier‑1 | https://limewire.network/ | Tier‑1 description of LimeWire Network (decentralized storage; staking/slashing claimed) — requires address‑level verification. |
No comments to display
No comments to display