Skip to main content

ULTILAND

ULTILAND (ARTX) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

ULTILAND — an AI/Agents | DeFi | Infra project about the tokenization of cultural/art RWA and IP (ARToken issuance) and the participation economy around them (incentives, staking, governance). The key AI layer in Tier‑1: AI appraisal (asset valuation) and the claimed Art AI Agent. Token (symbol: ARTX, BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a protocol/platform for issuing and trading ARToken (tokenized cultural assets and IP) and “DeArt/DeArt Eco” mechanics (LP incentives, staking, rewards).
  • Who it’s for: creators/rights holders (issuers), campaign participants/investors/collectors, liquidity providers.
  • Why onchain/token: ARTX — payments in services, settlement for RWA, staking/incentives and governance; onchain is needed for issuing/recording rights and for the market.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): docs guides on tokenization (Muse Point, LP, vesting) and the miniARTX mechanism (dApp activation + onchain behavior), plus the live token contract on BscScan.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The issuer does: sets the ARToken parameters (supply/price/fundraising) and launches the issuance via the tokenization mode (uniform-price subscription).
  2. The system does: records the valuation/proofs for the asset (AI appraisal + third‑party experts; CID hashing/ZK‑proofs — Tier‑1 whitepaper), forms the fundraising logic and the “Muse Point” (the moment of completion/anchoring), adds initial liquidity and vesting rules.
  3. The participant does: participates in the subscription/LP/holding/trading, receives ARToken and/or miniARTX rewards according to the Ins.Power rules.
  4. Where the blockchain is: token issuance, AMM pools, vesting/lock logic, recording of rights/certificates (within the ARToken claim‑certificate model) — onchain (EVM/BSC).
  5. Token role: ARTX/miniARTX — unit of account/settlement/incentives; ARTX is also the governance token, miniARTX — an escrowed incentive unit with controlled release into ARTX.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name ULTILAND
Also known as (aliases) Ultiland; DeArt; ARToken; miniARTX; IProtocol; ARTX
Logo (logo) ../assets/92_ultiland_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) ARTX
Category AI/Agents | DeFi | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) 2025-11-11
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x8105743e8A19c915a604D7D9e7aa3A060A4C2c32
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + staking + governance)
Max supply 58 767 498.215314 (Max Total Supply on BNB Smart Chain)
Issuance capped (Max Total Supply on-chain)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) dual-token: ARTX (utility/governance) + miniARTX (escrowed incentive unit → controlled release into ARTX); staking/incentives + buyback&burn/LP mechanics
Governance tokenholder governance (Stake-to-Vote — intent)
Admins/keys token contract proxy (upgradeable); admin details — not extracted
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI appraisal + Art AI agent for tokenization
Use‑case (use_case) art/IP RWA tokenization + incentive economy
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 3 / token_score 3 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In Tier‑1 sources, ULTILAND describes itself as a Web3 protocol that “brings real‑world art and IP on-chain” and builds a “DeArt meets DeFi” economy around the issuance/trading and liquidity of tokenized cultural assets.

The documentation highlights: (a) the ARToken tokenization mode (issuance of an asset token and the fundraising/liquidity/vesting rules), (b) the economic pairing ARTX + miniARTX for payments/settlement/staking/incentives and governance participation, (c) the asset verification layer (AI appraisal + PoR + RWA oracle, CID hashing and ZK‑proofs — Tier‑1 whitepaper).

Features/modules

  • ARToken RWA issuance (tokenization mode): fundraising, Muse Point, LP bootstrapping, vesting/lock schedule, issuer/investor flows.
  • 2+1 token system: ARTX + miniARTX + ARToken (per the whitepaper — “2+1 token system”).
  • Inspiration Power (Ins.Power) incentives: daily settlement/rewards (in the testnet guide — miniARTX/miniTest).
  • Asset verification (Tier‑1): AI appraisal + Proof of Reserve + RWA oracle (Function Chain), CID hashing/ZK‑proofs.
  • Governance framework: proposal/voting with an evolution toward Stake‑to‑Vote and multi‑factor weights (intent).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (asset issuer): sets the ARToken parameters → runs the fundraising → at the Muse Point receives the issuance + a market with initial liquidity and vesting rules.
  • Scenario 2 (participant): holds/buys ARTX and activates a wallet in the dApp → receives Ins.Power → daily miniARTX rewards (on testnet — miniTest).
  • Scenario 3 (LP/staker): adds liquidity/participates in staking → receives incentives; accelerated release of miniARTX → ARTX includes a fee → buyback&burn and LP.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (BNB Smart Chain). Participation in the miniARTX mechanics requires an “activation login” in the dApp (Tier‑1 guide).
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain; the ARTX token — BEP‑20.
  • Fees: BSC network fees and trading/protocol fees in the tokenization/LP mechanics (per the docs: trading fee distribution).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: EVM smart contracts for token issuance/accounting, AMM/LP structures, vesting/lock rules; an offchain layer for calculations/snapshots (e.g., Ins.Power snapshots); metadata storage via IPFS/CID (Tier‑1).
  • Participant roles: ARToken issuers; participants (holders/traders); LPs/stakers; governance participants; asset auditors/verifiers.
  • Where logic runs: issuance/market/pools/lock restrictions — onchain (BSC/EVM); part of the verification and data (AI appraisal, experts, backend services) — offchain with hashes/proofs recorded onchain.
  • Dependencies: IPFS/CID; ZK proofs; the oracle layer (Function Chain); third‑party AMMs (the guide lists PancakeSwap V4 as the scope for Ins.Power).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility (Tier‑1): ARTX — the payment unit in Ultiland/DeArt services and governance; utility includes payment, RWA settlement, incentives, staking, collaboration.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the tokenization mode and the incentive engine use ARTX/miniARTX as the unit of account/settlement/incentives; without the tokens, the described participation‑measurement and release mechanism cannot be implemented.
  • Who pays fees: participants who perform onchain actions (fundraising, trading, LP, staking, unlock/acceleration) pay the network + protocol fees.
  • Where fees go: in the tokenization docs: trading fee distribution (platform / leader bonus / LP incentives / ARTX buyback & burn); in the tokenomics: release acceleration directs the fee to buyback&burn and LP.
  • Issuance/burn: the tokenomics describes a capped supply and separate mechanics for miniARTX (tax+burn; unreleased emission burns) and ARTX (via conversion); the onchain Max Total Supply per BscScan differs from the whitepaper parameters (see Evidence).
  • Incentive mechanisms: Ins.Power (holding + buy volume) → daily settlement; staking pools; VMSAP as an adaptive emission model (Tier‑1).
  • Distribution: the tokenomics has a genesis distribution table and vesting schedules (Tier‑1).
  • Treasury: governance‑controlled pools/treasury are mentioned (Tier‑1).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: ARTX holders (Tier‑1 governance section).
  • How protocol parameters change: proposals/votes on issuance/incentives/release and network parameters; evolution toward Stake‑to‑Vote (Tier‑1).
  • Where: the governance model is described in the whitepaper; voting tooling was not recorded within this card.
  • Keys/multisig: — (token contract proxy, but admin details were not extracted).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: there is a mention of CertiK Skynet Project Insight (Tier‑1 docs).
  • Bug bounty: the governance section claims that there is a community-driven bug bounty and monitoring, but no specific Tier‑1 program/terms were found.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of centralized asset valuation/verification (AI appraisal + experts), oracle/bridge risks, upgrade risks (proxy), AMM/LP and token mechanics risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the ARTX token is deployed on BNB Smart Chain; the docs contain testnet‑phase guides on the miniARTX mechanics.
  • Key milestones: ARTX token contract deployment (2025‑11‑11); whitepaper v2.0 (update Nov 2025).
  • Roadmap: set out on the website (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: PancakeSwap V4 is mentioned as the trading scope for Ins.Power; IPFS/CID; ZK proofs; Bitcoin Ordinals/BRC‑20 (Tier‑1 tech section).
  • Partners: the website has a list of logos/partners (without separate contracts in this card).
  • Where it’s actually used: ARToken issuance and participation via the dApp/docs guides (Tier‑1).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? the Tier‑1 whitepaper describes AI‑powered asset appraisal (multimodal recognition + large model scoring) and the website claims an Art AI Agent (creation/curation/auto‑minting).
  • What is truly onchain? issuance/trading/LP/vesting for ARToken and the ARTX/miniARTX tokens; PoR/CID anchoring and (claimed) ZK proofs, plus the BSC token contract.
  • Why is a token needed? ARTX — payment/settlement, incentives/staking and governance; miniARTX — escrowed incentives and release → ARTX.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (no demo/quality metrics for AI appraisal/the AI agent), onchain‑washing (part of the appraisal/verifications is offchain), upgrade risk (proxy), oracle/expert risk.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity high 3
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is only a roadmap/intent about AI without a working AI component.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes AI appraisal and the Art AI Agent as part of the product (this is already AI reality, albeit without metrics/demos).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI appraisal evaluates/scores assets (authenticity/liquidity potential/marketability); an Art AI Agent is also claimed (automation of minting/curation/community).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/4.-technology ; https://www.ultiland.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes the functions of AI appraisal and claims the AI Agent as an ecosystem component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is a demo/guide specifically for AI appraisal / the Art AI Agent (how to run/use the AI module).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a dApp and guides on mining/tokenization, but no step‑by‑step demo/guide specifically for the AI module.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics/benchmarks for AI appraisal/the AI agent are not published as a Tier‑1 artifact.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the AI appraisal architecture is described (multimodal recognition + large model scoring + contextual signals).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/4.-technology
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a technical description of the approach (albeit without specific models/versions).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: ARTX BEP‑20 0x8105743e8A19c915a604D7D9e7aa3A060A4C2c32
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x8105743e8A19c915a604D7D9e7aa3A060A4C2c32 ; https://bscscan.com/tx/0x83c78916921771e158adceb8fd66ced6914936fd779a85a6a648f3d2bdb27307
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer confirms the contract, the chain and the creation timestamp (launch/creation date).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: ARToken issuance, AMM/LP and vesting/lock mechanics, as well as onchain accounting/anchoring of assets via CID/ZK proofs (within the design).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/launchpad/tokenization ; https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/4.-technology
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes specific onchain tokenization/LP/vesting logic and onchain anchoring of metadata.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 1
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain, there is no verifiable issuance/trading of ARToken and claim certificates of rights; onchain incentives/vesting/LP break down.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/launchpad/tokenization ; https://www.ultiland.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the project’s core mechanics are onchain tokenization and the market.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, ARTX (BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics ; https://bscscan.com/token/0x8105743e8A19c915a604D7D9e7aa3A060A4C2c32
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs + the explorer confirm the token and its parameters.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): ARTX — the unit for payment within Ultiland and DeArt services + RWA settlement.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics explicitly states “payment within Ultiland and DeArt services”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): incentives/staking/rewards via miniARTX and Ins.Power; there are burn/tax mechanics and buyback&burn per the fee distribution.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics ; https://docs.ultiland.io/event/miniartx-gameplay-mechanism-overview-testnet-phase ; https://docs.ultiland.io/launchpad/tokenization
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes staking pools, emission/release and the fee/burn distribution.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): governance anchored by ARTX: proposal rights + voting power; evolution toward Stake‑to‑Vote.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/7.-governance ; https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the governance section directly ties governance to ARTX.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the token is embedded in the payment/settlement/incentive/governance structures; an equivalent replacement is not described.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics ; https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/7.-governance
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the token as a “coordination medium” and the basis of governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.ultiland.io/ Product positioning: DeArt, ARToken, Art AI Agent, IProtocol; roadmap and ecosystem modules.
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/6.-tokenomics Tokenomics: dual-token ARTX+miniARTX; utilities (payment/governance/staking/incentives); supply parameters and distribution/vesting (whitepaper).
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/7.-governance Governance: ARTX as the governance anchor; Stake-to-Vote (intent) and decision areas; mention of bug bounty/monitoring.
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/white-paper/4.-technology Tech: AI appraisal (multimodal + LLM scoring), PoR + CID hashing + ZK proofs, oracle/Function Chain, EVM issuance.
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/launchpad/tokenization ARToken tokenization mode: issuance fees, Muse Point, LP bootstrapping, vesting, fee distribution + buyback&burn.
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/event/miniartx-gameplay-mechanism-overview-testnet-phase Step‑by‑step guide to the miniARTX mechanics (Ins.Power, activation in the dApp, settlement; staking gameplay).
Tier‑1 https://dapp.ultiland.io/ The Ultiland dApp (entry point for activation/login and participation in the onchain mechanics).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x8105743e8A19c915a604D7D9e7aa3A060A4C2c32 Onchain fact of the ARTX token (BEP‑20), the contract and Max Total Supply (on BSC).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/tx/0x83c78916921771e158adceb8fd66ced6914936fd779a85a6a648f3d2bdb27307 Timestamp of the token contract creation (2025‑11‑11) — the token launch/creation date.
Tier‑1 https://docs.ultiland.io/others/audit-report Link to CertiK Skynet Project Insight for Ultiland (audit/monitoring).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 demo/guide specifically for the AI agent/AI appraisal (how to run the AI module) was found.

No comments to display

Back to top