Act I: The AI Prophecy
Act I: The AI Prophecy (ACT) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Act I: The AI Prophecy — an AI/Other | Meme project on Solana, token (symbol: ACT).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a meme/community token on Solana with an “AI prophecy”/narrative; in Tier‑1 sources it is described as an “AI Community Token” with a mission of an “index of AI agents”, but a working AI product/protocol is not confirmed.
- Who it’s for: the crypto community/followers, Telegram/X participants, token holders.
- Why onchain/token: only the fact of the SPL token (mint) on Solana is confirmed onchain; the necessity of onchain for AI functions is not shown in Tier‑1.
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the website/whitepaper
https://actsol.xyzand the onchain mint in the Solana explorerhttps://explorer.solana.com/address/GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: reads the project’s narrative/materials and (optionally) buys/transfers the ACT token on Solana.
- The system does: records ownership/transfers of the ACT token as a standard SPL asset on Solana.
- The user gets: an onchain token in their wallet and participation in the community/narrative.
- Where the blockchain is: on the blockchain — only the token (mint + transfers).
- Token role: Tier‑1 sources do not show a mandatory role of ACT in a specific AI product/service → we treat it as a replaceable meme token.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Act I: The AI Prophecy |
| Also known as (aliases) | ACT; AI Community Token; Act I |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/85_act-i-the-ai-prophecy_logo.jpg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | ACT |
| Category | AI/Other | Meme |
| Primary chain (chain) | Solana |
| Type | non-EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Solana) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | SPL |
| Token contract | GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | — |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | no |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | community (as claimed) |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | AI education/community |
| Use‑case (use_case) | AI community meme token |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://actsol.xyz |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://actsol.xyz/whitepaper |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://solscan.io/token/GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump |
| X | https://twitter.com/ACTICOMMUNITY |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/actportal |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/act-i-the-ai-prophecy |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/act-i-the-ai-prophecy/ |
General project overview
Act I: The AI Prophecy is a project that positions itself on its website as an “AI Community Token” and declares a mission to become “the definitive index of all AI agents” and “the standard at the intersection of AI and meme culture”. In the Tier‑1 sources (website/whitepaper page), the main content is the narrative and a description of the community/mission; a specific protocol, open code or a reproducible AI service is not shown in these sources.
The verifiable part within this card is the onchain fact of the token ACT on Solana (mint address), which is listed on the website and visible in the explorer.
Features/modules
- Community layer: X/Telegram (listed in
links_*). - Website/whitepaper page: narrative, “mission”, reference texts.
- Onchain asset: the SPL token ACT (mint on Solana).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1 (community member): reads the materials on the website → joins Telegram/X → participates in discussions.
- Scenario 2 (token holder): interacts with ACT on Solana and uses the token as a community asset.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a Solana wallet and SOL for fees, if performing onchain operations.
- Network/chain: Solana mainnet.
- Fees: Solana fees for transfers/operations with the token.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the SPL token (mint) on Solana + the website/social channels.
- Participant roles: token holders; community members; a (possible) team/moderators (not formalized in Tier‑1).
- Where logic runs: onchain — only token transfers; offchain — content/community.
- Dependencies: Solana infrastructure (RPC/wallets/explorer) + the website.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: Tier‑1 sources describe ACT as an “AI Community Token”; a specific “payment/stake/access” utility is not recorded.
- Protocol necessity drivers: there is no Tier‑1 evidence that ACT is technically mandatory for the operation of a specific AI protocol/product.
- Who pays fees: Solana users — transaction fees.
- Where fees go: to Solana validators (network level).
- Issuance/burn: — (the supply/issuance parameters were not extracted from the Tier‑1 sources of this file).
- Security/incentive mechanisms: —.
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: —.
- Treasury: —.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: not described as a formal DAO scheme in Tier‑1 sources →
—. - How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: meme token risks (market risks, concentration), risks of access to/updating the token metadata, phishing risks in the community channels.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the token exists on Solana mainnet; the project maintains a website and community channels.
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: Solana wallets/explorers; dexscreener is listed on the website as a trading dashboard (not Tier‑1).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: as an SPL token and a community asset; no confirmed Tier‑1 integrations “into a product” were found.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Tier‑1 sources contain an AI narrative and a claimed mission about an “index of AI agents/AI education”, but there is no Tier‑1 evidence of a working AI component (demo/code/architecture/metrics).
- What is truly onchain? The SPL token ACT on Solana (mint address).
- Why is a token needed? A verifiable necessity of the token for an AI product is not shown; it looks like a replaceable community/meme token.
- Red flags (based on the information found): high risk of AI‑washing (AI is claimed without artifacts); onchain‑washing (only a token without a protocol); token‑washing (no utility other than “community”).
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the project declares an AI mission (“index of all AI agents”, “AI meets meme culture”), but does not show a working AI component.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://actsol.xyz/ ; https://actsol.xyz/whitepaper
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a Tier‑1 declaration of direction (intent), without a demo/architecture/metrics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): specific AI functionality/services/agents that actually work are described.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (the available Tier‑1 content has no description of specific AI functionality as an implemented product)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a narrative, but no technically verifiable description of “what the AI does”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): there is a demo of the “index of AI agents” / an AI application.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —. No Tier‑1 demo/guide was found.
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a reproducible demo/guide, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (no quality metrics/benchmarks were found)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without metrics, AI_3 is not counted.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): there is a technical description/architecture/versions of the AI component (how the “index of AI agents” is built).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (the available Tier‑1 content has no architecture/specs)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): a technical description/architecture is absent.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Solana
- Addresses/identifiers: SPL mint
GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump ; https://actsol.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer + the website record the token address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: Tier‑1 confirms only the token; protocol/application contracts are not shown.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (addresses of other contracts/a protocol were not found)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/a description of the onchain mechanics, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: without onchain, only the accounting of token ownership disappears; the AI functions are not shown as tied to trustless onchain mechanics.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the criticality of onchain for the product is not proven.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, ACT (SPL mint on Solana).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer confirms the onchain asset.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the ACT token is the mandatory payment currency for a specific AI service.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (not found)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no payment utility of the token in Tier‑1 sources.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): ACT is used as a stake/collateral/penalty for protocol security.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (not found)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): incentives/slashing/staking are not described.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): ACT provides voting/governance of the protocol.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — — (not found)
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): governance mechanics are not confirmed in Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the necessity of the ACT token for the operation of a specific AI product is not proven (it looks replaceable).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://actsol.xyz/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website does not record a mandatory utility of the token for a specific service/protocol.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://actsol.xyz/ | Tier‑1 positioning (AI intent), the “mission”, the listing of the token’s mint address and a description of the community narrative. |
| Tier‑1 | https://actsol.xyz/whitepaper | The “Whitepaper” page (in fact — the same Tier‑1 content/narrative, without tech specs). |
| Tier‑1 | https://explorer.solana.com/address/GJAFwWjJ3vnTsrQVabjBVK2TYB1YtRCQXRDfDgUnpump | The onchain fact of the ACT token’s SPL mint on Solana. |
| Tier‑1 | — | No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is a working AI product/index of AI agents (demo/code/architecture)” was found. |
No comments to display
No comments to display