Skip to main content

Cookie DAO / cookie.fun

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the public terminal cookie.fun, which aggregates social + onchain + trading signals and provides an “intelligence layer” on projects/narratives (including on AI agents).
  • Who it’s for: traders/analysts/projects, as well as developers of AI agents who need a data stream and “context”.
  • Why onchain/token: the COOKIE token is used for governance of Cookie DAO and for staking/locks, which give access to reward mechanics (Multi‑Airdrop Farming) and a “boost” in campaigns.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): cookie.fun (the terminal) and the Cookie DAO documentation pages (cookie.fun features + the “Staking $COOKIE” guide).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: opens cookie.fun, selects a project/category/network and views attention/sentiment/voice metrics + feeds/summaries.
  2. The system does: collects and aggregates data streams (social sentiment, market and onchain signals) and displays them in the terminal; some features are claimed as AI‑assisted (summaries/DeepResearch).
  3. The user gets: “context” and dashboards on who drives the narrative and how attention correlates with onchain activity.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the onchain part is the COOKIE token (BEP‑20) and smart‑contract locks/staking (BNB Smart Chain and Base) for access to utility and governance.
  5. Token role: staking/locks for campaigns and airdrops + participation in DAO governance (voting).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Cookie DAO / cookie.fun
Also known as (aliases) COOKIE; Cookie DAO; cookie.fun
Logo (logo) ../assets/89_cookie_logo.ico
Token symbol (ticker) COOKIE
Category AI/Data | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024-06-05
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f
Token model (token_type) utility (staking + governance)
Max supply 795 791 375.606868 (Max Total Supply on BNB Smart Chain)
Issuance capped (Max Total Supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) staking/lock: Multi‑Airdrop Farming + capital boosts in campaigns; governance via Tokenholders
Governance DAO (Snapshot + staking‑gated voting)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) core contributors: Cookie3 team members (per the Tier‑1 ecosystem page)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI summaries + crypto intelligence terminal
Use‑case (use_case) crypto intelligence for humans + AI agents
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

According to the Tier‑1 description of the Cookie Ecosystem (Cookie3 + Cookie DAO), Cookie is positioned as a “data and activation layer” that gathers/indexes/analyzes social/market/onchain data in order to understand who generates the social attention that converts into onchain actions. Within the same structure, the COOKIE token is used for DAO governance and for the staking/lock mechanics tied to campaigns and rewards.

Features/modules

  • cookie.fun terminal: mindshare, sentiment, top voices, project dashboards (social + onchain data).
  • AI summaries / Cookie DeepResearch (Tier‑1 claimed): AI‑assisted summaries/insights on top of the data.
  • Cookie Snaps / campaigns: a reward‑program mechanic that links attention and onchain actions.
  • Staking / Multi‑Airdrop Farming: COOKIE token utility for airdrops and boosts.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (trader/analyst): views mindshare/sentiment/top voices for a project → gets the context of “who drives the narrative”.
  • Scenario 2 (project/marketing): uses Cookie Snaps / campaigns → links attention to onchain actions and distributes rewards.
  • Scenario 3 (token holder): stakes/locks COOKIE → gets access to MAF and boosts.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: to view the terminal — a browser; for staking/campaigns — an EVM wallet and COOKIE + gas.
  • Network/chain: the COOKIE token — BNB Smart Chain (BEP‑20); staking is claimed as available on BNB Smart Chain and Base.
  • Fees: network fees for approve/stake/lock/claim.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the cookie.fun web terminal; offchain data aggregation; the onchain layer of the token + staking/lock contracts.
  • Participant roles: terminal users; token holders/stakers; campaign participants (creators/projects); DAO participants.
  • Where logic runs: data collection/processing and AI summaries — offchain; token ownership and staking/locking — onchain (BNB/Base).
  • Dependencies: social stream sources, onchain indexing and market data (Tier‑1: social + market + onchain data).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: staking/locks give access to Multi‑Airdrop Farming and “capital boosts” in campaigns; the token is also claimed as the DAO governance asset.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: Cookie DAO governance and staking‑gating of utility (MAF/campaigns) are described as mechanics tied to the COOKIE token.
  • Who pays fees: users who perform onchain operations (approve/stake/lock/claim) on the respective network.
  • Where fees go: network fees — to validators/the network; protocol fees/reward distribution policies — not recorded in Tier‑1 within this card.
  • Issuance/burn: BscScan lists a Max Total Supply (capped); additional issuance/burn mechanics were not extracted from Tier‑1.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: staking/locking in a smart contract for fixed terms; MAF rewards depend on the amount of locked tokens and on campaign requirements.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: —. No Tier‑1 distribution/vesting was found.
  • Treasury: the constitution states that the treasury is held on a dedicated multisig (addresses not extracted).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: Cookie DAO Tokenholders (in the constitution: voting for stakers; the governance layer on COOKIE).
  • How protocol parameters change: via proposals and voting; binding voting — via Snapshot (or an equivalent).
  • Where: Snapshot (per the constitution) and internal DAO processes (Chef’s Council, Legal Wrapper, etc.).
  • Keys/multisig: treasury — a dedicated multisig wallet (details/addresses not extracted).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of data/source quality and manipulation; centralization risks of offchain aggregation; smart‑contract risks of staking/locks (without public audits).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the public terminal cookie.fun is running (the main page shows a “Live” status and a version).
  • Key milestones: deployment of the COOKIE token on BNB Smart Chain (creation tx — 2024‑06‑05).
  • Roadmap: —. No separate Tier‑1 roadmap page was found.

Ecosystem/integrations

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? the Tier‑1 docs claim AI summaries/AI‑assisted insights (Cookie DeepResearch, AI summaries) on top of the aggregated data.
  • What is truly onchain? the COOKIE token on BNB Smart Chain (BEP‑20) + staking/locks (BNB/Base) for access to utility.
  • Why is a token needed? Cookie DAO governance + participation in incentive mechanics (MAF/campaigns, capital boosts) via staking/locking.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (no Tier‑1 technical description of models/versions), onchain‑washing (the key product logic is offchain), security risk (audits/bug bounty are not confirmed by Tier‑1).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is a Tier‑1 roadmap/intent without a working AI component.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes working AI summaries/AI‑assisted insights (this is already AI reality, not only intent).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): cookie.fun provides AI summaries/AI‑assisted insights (DeepResearch, AI summaries) on top of social+onchain+market data.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/introduction ; https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/cookie.fun/cookie.fun
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes AI‑assisted insights and AI summaries as part of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): there is a live cookie.fun terminal + a doc page explaining the key features (mindshare/sentiment/top voices, project dashboards, AI summaries).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.cookie.fun/ ; https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/cookie.fun/cookie.fun
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is reproducible access to the product and “what to do/what to look at” in the Tier‑1 documentation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —. No public quality metrics for the AI summaries/models were found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without benchmarks/metrics we do not count AI_3.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is a technical description/architecture/versions of the AI modules (DeepResearch/summary).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the functionality, but without the model architecture/versions we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: the COOKIE token (BEP‑20) 0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f ; https://bscscan.com/tx/0xa64b0f32d1296cad3c0cad4d5ae4bbd5c9269014900908d208f1bdde1c3c73da
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer confirms the contract, the network and the creation timestamp.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: staking/locking of COOKIE in smart contracts for access to utility (MAF/boosts) and for a governance vote.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/staking-usdcookie ; https://assets.cookie.community/assets/CookieDAOConstitution.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes that tokens are “locked in the smart contract” and that voting is tied to the staking function.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the terminal/analytics remain functional offchain; onchain is mostly about ownership/governance/staking‑gating, but “trustless execution” of the key product logic is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the criticality of onchain for the core analytics is not shown.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, COOKIE (BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer confirms the token and supply.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): COOKIE is a mandatory payment currency for access to the terminal/data.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the available Tier‑1 sources, payment in COOKIE for the service is not recorded (there is open access + staking‑gating of individual utilities).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): staking/locks of COOKIE give access to Multi‑Airdrop Farming and campaigns/boosts (economic incentives).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/staking-usdcookie ; https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/airdrops-for-usdcookie-stakers
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes the benefits of staking and the farming/airdrop mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): COOKIE is used as the governance token of Cookie DAO; voting is tied to staking (SAS) and Snapshot.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://assets.cookie.community/assets/CookieDAOConstitution.pdf ; https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/introduction
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the constitution describes the voting procedure and the role of the token in governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance and staking utility are described as embedded in COOKIE; replacing them with a “subscription” changes the ownership/voting model and the incentives.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://assets.cookie.community/assets/CookieDAOConstitution.pdf ; https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/staking-usdcookie
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 ties voting and staking benefits to the COOKIE token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.cookie.fun/ Live cookie.fun terminal (AI agents index / analytics terminal; “Live” status, version in the UI).
Tier‑1 https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/introduction Cookie DAO as a data layer for crypto intelligence + Cookie DeepResearch (AI‑assisted insights) and the governance role of $COOKIE.
Tier‑1 https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/cookie.fun/cookie.fun Description of cookie.fun: mindshare/sentiment/top voices, project dashboards, AI summaries and open access.
Tier‑1 https://www.cookie3.com/ecosystem Cookie Ecosystem: “gather, index, analyze” social/market/onchain data; Cookie DAO powered by $COOKIE; Cookie3 team — core contributors.
Tier‑1 https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/staking-usdcookie Staking COOKIE (BNB/Base), tokens locked in smart contract + benefits (MAF + boosts) + a step‑by‑step guide.
Tier‑1 https://docs.cookie.community/cookie-dao/usdcookie-token/airdrops-for-usdcookie-stakers Multi‑Airdrop Farming: access to airdrops via staking/locking + campaign requirements.
Tier‑1 https://assets.cookie.community/assets/CookieDAOConstitution.pdf Governance: COOKIE as the governance layer; voting via SAS + Snapshot; treasury multisig.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xc0041ef357b183448b235a8ea73ce4e4ec8c265f Onchain fact of the COOKIE token (BEP‑20), contract and Max Total Supply.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xa64b0f32d1296cad3c0cad4d5ae4bbd5c9269014900908d208f1bdde1c3c73da Timestamp of the token contract creation (2024‑06‑05) — the token launch/creation date.

No comments to display

Back to top