Skip to main content

Grok (ERC‑20)

Grok (GROK ERC‑20) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Grok (GROK) — a Meme project on Ethereum, token (symbol: GROK).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a meme token on Ethereum inspired by “Grok”, with no confirmed connection to xAI.
  • Who it’s for: the meme‑token community/traders.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is the token itself and its transactions; no provable AI product part was found.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: performs operations with GROK or interacts with it as a community asset.
  2. The system does: standard ERC‑20 operations.
  3. The user gets: participation in the community around the meme asset.
  4. Where the blockchain is: Ethereum mainnet.
  5. Token role (if any): the token is the object itself.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Grok (ERC‑20)
Also known as (aliases) GROK; Grok on ETH
Logo (logo) ../assets/176_grok-erc_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) GROK
Category Meme
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x8390a1dA07E376ef7Add4Be859ba74fB83AA02D5
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 6,900,000,000 GROK (fixed), decimals: 9
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) per the whitepaper: community memecoin, 0% tax, LP burn/renounce (as claimed)
Governance —
Admins/keys renounced (as claimed)
Audit no
Bug bounty —
Team (team) — (community-driven)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) none (Grok meme reference)
Use‑case (use_case) meme token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 1
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Grok (GROK ERC‑20) is a meme token on Ethereum. The whitepaper emphasizes that it is a community token and that there is no affiliation with xAI/Elon Musk (claimed). Within this card, no verifiable AI product/demo/metrics were found.

Features/modules

  • GROK ERC‑20 token (the main object).
  • Community channels (Website/Telegram/X community).
  • Utility pages/resources (for example, “GROKME.ME” as part of the ecosystem on the website/whitepaper).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user performs operations with GROK → receives a standard ERC‑20 asset in the wallet.
  • Scenario 2: a user transfers GROK → standard ERC‑20 transactions are executed on Ethereum.
  • Scenario 3: a user interacts with GROK → participates in the community/meme ecosystem.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet (for example, MetaMask) and ETH for fees.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
  • Fees: Ethereum gas.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the ERC‑20 token contract + wallets/DEXs/explorers.
  • Participant roles: token holders/traders.
  • Where logic runs: onchain (Ethereum): token transfers/balances; offchain — community/websites.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum and access infrastructure (RPC, DEXs, explorers).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: in Tier‑1 sources the token is described as a community memecoin; a separate protocol utility (payment for a service/access/staking) is not confirmed.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the “protocol” necessity of the token is not established; the token acts as an object of community/trading.
  • Who pays fees: users pay standard Ethereum gas on transactions; trading fees — at the level of DEXs/exchanges.
  • Where fees go: gas — to Ethereum validators/the network; other fees depend on the chosen trading venue.
  • Issuance/burn: fixed max total supply 6,900,000,000 (Etherscan); the whitepaper claims LP burnt and renounced (see Evidence).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: no protocol staking/slashing mechanisms were found in Tier‑1 sources; standard ERC‑20 risks are possible (see “Threat model”).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (no consolidated distribution/vesting table was found in the reviewed Tier‑1 sources).
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (no formalized governance/DAO was found in Tier‑1 sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (a protocol as a separate system is not confirmed; there is a token).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: the project’s community channels (X community/Telegram; see links_*).
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: no public Tier‑1 audit reports were found (Etherscan: “No Contract Security Audit Submitted”).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: the whitepaper describes “sniper incidents” with addresses where tokens were blocked by a protection mechanism (see Evidence).
  • Threat model: meme‑token risks: absence of product utility, smart contract/DEX liquidity risks, the risk of brand/affiliation substitution, as well as the risk of centralization/admin functions (if the renounce claim turns out to be incorrect — double‑check onchain).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active as an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum.
  • Key releases/milestones: launch: 2023‑11 (claimed in the whitepaper).
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: EVM wallets; DEX (Uniswap) and analytics dashboards (see links in the whitepaper).
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: primarily as a memecoin/community asset; no separate “product” usage is confirmed in Tier‑1.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? No verifiable AI component was found; “Grok” is used as a meme reference.
  • What is truly onchain? the ERC‑20 token and transactions.
  • Why is a token needed? the token is an object of trading/community.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing (AI references without artifacts), token‑washing.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 1
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 roadmap/declarations of “we are building an AI product” were found; this is a community memecoin.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper describes a meme token and a community context without an AI plan/roadmap as a product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): an AI function (inference/training/agents) as part of the product is not described.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper ; https://grokoneth.meme/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 sources contain no description of an AI system, only the token/community.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no demo of an AI product/module was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the listed links/sections describe the token and the meme ecosystem, but not a demonstration of AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no AI quality metrics, since the AI component is not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a technical description of the AI architecture/model versions is absent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no AI artifacts (model/code/architecture) in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0x8390a1dA07E376ef7Add4Be859ba74fB83AA02D5 (ERC‑20)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8390a1da07e376ef7add4be859ba74fb83aa02d5
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the contract and token parameters are verifiable onchain via Etherscan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: in the reviewed Tier‑1 sources, no useful onchain logic was found other than the ERC‑20 token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8390a1da07e376ef7add4be859ba74fb83aa02d5 ; https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed, but protocol/product contracts on top of it are not confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the “product” is not described as a system that breaks down without a blockchain; there is a token/community context.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient grounds for OC_3=1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the GROK token exists (ERC‑20 on Ethereum).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x8390a1da07e376ef7add4be859ba74fb83aa02d5
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): mandatory payment for a service with the token (as a protocol function) was not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics is described as a memecoin context without a clear “token-as-fee” mechanic for a service.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): protocol incentives (staking/slashing/rewards) via the token were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper does not describe staking/slashing as the core of a protocol.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance mechanics via the token (DAO/voting) are not confirmed in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of a governance process.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token is not confirmed as “strictly necessary” for a protocol/service; it looks replaceable/optional for any offchain utility.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes a memecoin context without the token being necessary for the product to work.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x8390a1da07e376ef7add4be859ba74fb83aa02d5 the fact of the token’s existence, supply/decimals parameters
Tier‑1 https://grokoneth.meme/whitepaper positioning of the token and the disclaimer on affiliation
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source proving a real AI component (what exactly the AI does, a demo, metrics) was found in the reviewed sources
Tier‑3 — —

No comments to display

Back to top