Skip to main content

Mayflower AI

Mayflower AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Mayflower AI — an AI/Agents / DeFi project on Solana, token (symbol: MAY).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an AI browser extension (“AI Navigator”) and an AI co‑pilot for simplifying interaction with DeFi (per the litepaper).
  • Who it’s for: DeFi users (especially on Solana) who need an “AI assistant” for analyzing and executing onchain actions.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for executing transactions and DeFi actions; the MAY token is the ecosystem’s governance token (per the litepaper).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: sets an intent (for example, “find low‑risk USDC yield” or “make a swap”) in the extension.
  2. The system does: provides AI insights, analyzes the transaction/contract and guides the user through a safe flow; in the future — automates actions (“Titan AI”).
  3. The user gets: hints/analytics and simplified execution of onchain actions.
  4. Where the blockchain is: Solana (execution of swap/supply/withdraw and other DeFi actions), the MAY token (SPL).
  5. Token role (if any): governance; expansion of the utility — via governance per the roadmap.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Mayflower AI
Also known as (aliases) MAY; Mayflower AI Navigator
Logo (logo) ../assets/181_mayflower-ai_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) MAY
Category AI/Agents | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) 2025
Project status (status) in development
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract FJz7ptUR1FwxSHbb8Sfd5Cn6Zt4TqucJZKLqU4n66gdq
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 MAY (fixed)
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) 1:1 migration NPT→MAY; mint/freeze revoked (per the litepaper)
Governance DAO/Foundation treasury (per the litepaper)
Admins/keys mint/freeze authority revoked (per the litepaper)
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI co-pilot for DeFi + on-chain actions
Use‑case (use_case) help + automation of DeFi actions
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 2 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Mayflower AI describes the “AI‑Navigator” as a browser extension that helps the user explore DeFi, analyze transaction risks and execute onchain actions. The litepaper contains a roadmap for 2025 (test agent, testnet core actions, mainnet MVP, etc.).

Features/modules

  • AI Navigator (browser extension): a chat interface, personalized insights, explanations.
  • Transaction analysis: checking/simulation of transactions and risks (claimed).
  • Automated onchain actions: automation of yield strategies and actions (claimed as the next stage).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a browser/extension (as it launches) and a Solana wallet.
  • Network/chain: Solana.
  • Fees: Solana fees for onchain actions.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? an AI assistant/co‑pilot that answers questions, provides insights and helps execute onchain actions (described in the litepaper).
  • What is truly onchain? execution of swap/supply/withdraw and other actions on Solana + the MAY token.
  • Why is a token needed? governance; expansion of the utility — via governance (per the litepaper).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): there are no public quality metrics/benchmarks yet; many “future” features per the roadmap.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as a product feature (AI_1), not only an “intent”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a description of AI features → AI_1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI Navigator provides insights and helps analyze/execute DeFi actions, including “transaction analysis” and guided execution (described).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are specific features and scenarios.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the roadmap mentions a “Test Agent/closed testnet”, but there is no public demo “via a link” in this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): plans/stages ≠ a public demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics are not published.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is a product architecture/stages, but no technical description at the level of models/versions/benchmarks.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient artifacts for AI_4=1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: MAY mint: FJz7ptUR1FwxSHbb8Sfd5Cn6Zt4TqucJZKLqU4n66gdq
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/FJz7ptUR1FwxSHbb8Sfd5Cn6Zt4TqucJZKLqU4n66gdq
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token and its parameters are verifiable in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: the product describes the execution of DeFi actions (swap/supply/withdraw) as a key part.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain actions beyond the token are explicitly described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: onchain is needed for DeFi, but the “criticality” as a trustless property for the AI layer itself is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficiently strict argument for OC_3=1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the MAY token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): described in the litepaper and there is an onchain mint.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a payment necessity of the token for the operation of AI Navigator is not recorded in the litepaper as mandatory.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is designated as governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): collateral/penalty mechanics for the protocol are not described as mandatory.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): MAY is the ecosystem’s governance token (claimed).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): governance is explicitly specified in the tokenomics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): governance can be implemented without a separate token as well; product‑level irreplaceability is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the utility is claimed as expandable and “future”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/680dd391ae58387b8b91fdb1/6852e6f356a3d9fe68c58db2_91a339a4aa4d006ea5bdaedbd03a0b18_Mayflower%20Whitepaper%20%28English%29.pdf AI Navigator, tokenomics and roadmap
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/FJz7ptUR1FwxSHbb8Sfd5Cn6Zt4TqucJZKLqU4n66gdq onchain facts about the MAY token