Skip to main content

Maiga.ai

Maiga.ai — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Maiga.ai — an AI/Agents / DeFi project on BNB Chain, token (symbol: MAIGA).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform of AI agents for crypto/finance + an “AI agent economy” with a launchpad and a token model based on “proof of trading” (per the GitBook).
  • Who it’s for: users who need an AI agent/bot for analysis/signals/automation; creators/traders of AI agent tokens in the ecosystem.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for tokens/LP/launchpad and the economy; MAIGA is the base asset for “agent tokens”, payments and incentives (per the docs).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): Telegram bot/channel MaigaXBT — https://t.me/maigaxbt

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses an AI agent (MaigaXBT and others) or launches a new AI agent via the launchpad.
  2. The system does: provides the AI agent infrastructure (offchain) and the onchain economy of agent tokens (LP/routing via MAIGA).
  3. The user gets: AI insights/signals/services + the “agent tokens” economy.
  4. Where the blockchain is: BNB Chain (the MAIGA token, LP and the launchpad/trading mechanics).
  5. Token role (if any): the base asset of the ecosystem, payments, staking/benefits, launching agents.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Maiga.ai
Also known as (aliases) MAIGA; MaigaXBT
Logo (logo) ../assets/187_maiga_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) MAIGA
Category AI/Agents | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xcd1679f117E81DEfc4f0009311DDc23fC1AE4a5E
Token model (token_type) utility (staking)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 MAIGA (fixed), decimals: 18
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) oMAIGA incentive token (1:1) with unlock per Proof of Trading (per the docs)
Governance multisig (3/3 signers, per the docs)
Admins/keys ownership transferred to multisig (per the docs)
Audit yes (audit page in the docs)
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agents for crypto/finance
Use‑case (use_case) AI bots + agent economy
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 2 / 2 / 2 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Maiga.ai describes AI agent(s) for crypto/finance and an onchain economy of “agent tokens”, where MAIGA acts as the base asset: the created agent tokens are paired with MAIGA in LP, and part of the swap flows is routed via MAIGA (per the docs token utility).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? AI agents for analysis/signals/actions in the crypto environment (described in the docs).
  • What is truly onchain? the MAIGA token, LP and the economic mechanics for agent tokens and the “Proof of Trading” unlock model.
  • Why is a token needed? the base asset of the ecosystem, payments for AI services, launching new agents, staking/benefits (per the docs).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): part of the AI logic is inevitably offchain; a separate whitepaper (Notion) is not confirmed as an available Tier‑1 document → reliance on the GitBook.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI agents are described as a current product (AI_1/AI_2), not only an intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-tech/ai-agent
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are descriptions of features and modules.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents for crypto/financial scenarios (analysis/signals/management).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-tech/ai-agent
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the agent’s functionality is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a public Telegram bot/channel MaigaXBT is available as an entry point into the product.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://t.me/maigaxbt
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): it is an interactive artifact (app surface) that can be opened and used.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no quality metrics were found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the technical description of the models/versions and the agent architecture is insufficient for AI_4=1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no sufficient technical description.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xcd1679f117E81DEfc4f0009311DDc23fC1AE4a5E
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token address is listed and verifiable onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: the economic model of agent tokens/LP and the routing of swaps via MAIGA are described as onchain mechanics.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): useful onchain logic beyond the token is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the criticality of onchain “in the trustless sense” for the whole product is not strictly proven in this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient justification for OC_3=1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the MAIGA token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics page records the supply/address.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): payments for AI agent services are made onchain in MAIGA (per the docs).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the payment role is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): staking MAIGA gives benefits/allocations; there is also an oMAIGA unlock incentive mechanic (Proof of Trading).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/tokenomics , https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the incentive mechanics are described in the docs.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a governance mechanic via the token is not described in this card as an explicit process.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the token acts as the base asset of the agent economy and of onchain routing; replaceability is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): per the description, the token performs protocol functions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/token-utility MAIGA utility and the onchain economy of agent tokens
Tier‑1 https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/tokenomics supply/address, oMAIGA incentive model
Tier‑1 https://maiga.gitbook.io/docs/maiga-token/allocation MAIGA/oMAIGA distribution
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xcd1679f117e81defc4f0009311ddc23fc1ae4a5e onchain facts on the token
Tier‑1 https://t.me/maigaxbt demo surface: public Telegram bot/channel MaigaXBT