Botto
Botto — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Botto — an AI/Other / Consumer project (a decentralized “autonomous artist” and DAO governance of generative art), token (symbol: BOTTO).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a generative art project where an algorithm creates many variants (“fragments”), and the DAO provides feedback by voting, influencing further generation.
- Who it’s for: community members/collectors interested in generative art and joint governance of the directions of generation.
- Why onchain/token: the BOTTO token is used for participation in the DAO (voting/staking/rewards), and the final works are regularly minted and auctioned (the docs mention SuperRare).
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the voting dApp — https://botto.com/app/vote
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: opens the dApp and votes for the fragments they like (the docs describe Voting Points and staking).
- The system does: aggregates the community’s votes as feedback for the generative algorithm, which generates the next “round” of fragments.
- The user gets: participation in governing the artistic direction and, subject to conditions, access to rewards (per the docs).
- Where the blockchain is: the BOTTO token (Ethereum/Base) and onchain activity around minting/auctions (SuperRare is mentioned in the docs); in this card the onchain‑verifiable minimum is the token addresses.
- Token role: governance/staking/rewards (per the docs).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Botto |
| Also known as (aliases) | BottoDAO, BOTTO, botto.eth |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/197_botto_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | BOTTO |
| Category | AI/Other | Consumer |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | 2021-10-22 (first mint on SuperRare; per the docs) |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x9dfad1b7102d46b1b197b90095b5c4e9f5845bba (Ethereum) |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (staking + governance) |
| Max supply | 100,000,000 BOTTO (initial supply; per the docs) |
| Issuance | burn (the docs list total burned; supply decreases) |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | current supply 93,874,708 BOTTO and total burned 6,125,292 BOTTO (per the docs, as of 2024-11-30) |
| Governance | DAO (voting; snapshot and dApp) |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | yes (security review PDF in the docs) |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | generative art engine + DAO feedback |
| Use‑case (use_case) | generative art |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 3 / 1 / 1 / 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://botto.com/ |
| App / Demo | https://botto.com/app/vote |
| Docs | https://docs.botto.com/ |
| GitHub | https://github.com/bottoproject |
| Releases / Changelog | https://botto.com/dao/portal |
| Whitepaper | https://docs.botto.com/overview |
| Roadmap | https://botto.com/dao/roadmap |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x9dfad1b7102d46b1b197b90095b5c4e9f5845bba |
| X | https://twitter.com/bottoproject |
| Discord | https://discord.gg/botto |
| Telegram | https://t.me/+n-AoR1bPO7EwMGM0 |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@iambotto/a-decentralized-autonomous-artist-a1f0c9c5b2bc |
| Audit report(s) | https://1586706473-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2F-M_0hjxITfOCmPk6hVxr%2Fuploads%2FcfZjwtAwVMwTgeO0i0pj%2FBottoDAO_SecurityReview_Audita.pdf?alt=media&token=5e54bb28-c94a-4b49-b263-bfa67d7d4a56 |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/botto |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/botto/ |
General project overview
Per the Tier‑1 documentation, Botto is a “decentralized autonomous artist” that creates “fragments” weekly and offers them to the community. The community votes for fragments; the collective preferences are used as feedback for the generative algorithm to steer the next iteration of generation.
Once a week Botto mints one work as the final one and auctions it on SuperRare. The docs state that a share of the proceeds (40%) is returned to the community as rewards for contributing to voting.
The same docs list the models/approaches used: Botto started with VQGAN + CLIP and later added open‑source diffusion models (Stable Diffusion, Kandinsky, Flux).
Features/modules
- Weekly rounds: generation of fragments + voting.
- DAO feedback loop: participants’ votes as a signal for the algorithm.
- Mint + auction: regular mint of the final works and an auction (SuperRare).
- Staking / Voting Points / Rewards: participation and reward mechanics (per the docs).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user opens the dApp → votes for fragments → participates in shaping the algorithm’s “taste”.
- Scenario 2: a participant stakes BOTTO → gets access to extended participation/reward mechanics (per the docs).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: you can start voting by creating an account and opening the dApp; “full membership” requires staking BOTTO (per the docs).
- Network/chain: Ethereum and/or Base (the docs list the key contracts in both networks).
- Fees: gas of the chosen network for staking/token operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the BOTTO token (Ethereum/Base), the voting dApp, staking/reward mechanics, integration with a marketplace for auctions (SuperRare is mentioned in the docs).
- Where logic runs: art generation and vote processing — per the description, an offchain process; onchain — the token and mint/auctions.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Distribution: the docs contain the initial distribution (100,000,000 BOTTO; allocations by category) and a snapshot of the current distribution (as of 2024‑11‑30).
- Burn: the docs list the number of burned tokens (total burned).
- Participation mechanics: the docs describe staking, voting and rewards.
Governance
- Who makes decisions: BottoDAO (via voting; the docs also mention snapshot proposals as a source of change history).
Security and incidents
- Audits: a security review PDF is listed in the links.
- Bug bounty: — (not found in Tier‑1 sources).
Project status and timeline
- Current status: an active cycle of weekly rounds + voting/auctions (per the docs).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? Art generation by an algorithm and the evolution of the generative model/pipeline based on community feedback (per the docs).
- What is truly onchain? The BOTTO token (Ethereum/Base), as well as onchain mint/auctions (SuperRare is mentioned in the docs), but the addresses of the NFT/auction contracts were not recorded in this card.
- Why is a token needed? Per the docs: participation in voting/staking/receiving rewards and the governance mechanics.
- Red flags (based on the information found): the onchain part is mostly about the token and NFT activity; the product is not an “AI protocol” (it is a consumer product with DAO governance).
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | high | 3 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 1 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI is described as an operating component (not only intent/roadmap).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs describe art generation and the feedback loop, so the intent flag is not needed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Botto generates fragments and uses the community’s votes as feedback for the generation algorithm.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the generation and feedback process is described.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): a dApp for voting on fragments is available.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://botto.com/app/vote ; https://docs.botto.com/overview/quickstart
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is an interactive Tier‑1 artifact that can be opened and used for voting.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs contain descriptions of the process, but no benchmarks/model quality metrics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the docs list the models/engine (VQGAN+CLIP and diffusion models).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a list of the model stack and of engine updates at the system level.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum (Base is also mentioned)
- Addresses/identifiers: BOTTO
0x9dfad1b7102d46b1b197b90095b5c4e9f5845bba(Ethereum) - Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview/quickstart ; https://etherscan.io/token/0x9dfad1b7102d46b1b197b90095b5c4e9f5845bba
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs provide the address of the key contract, and the explorer allows verifying it.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: the final works are minted and auctioned, but the addresses of contracts/onchain logic other than the token were not recorded in this card.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/contracts we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: a significant part of the product (generation/voting as an interface) can exist offchain; no strict proof of onchain criticality was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain matters for ownership/the token, but criticality is not proven per the OC_3 standard.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, BOTTO.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview/quickstart
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is described in the docs and has an onchain address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the Tier‑1 docs do not record that BOTTO is a mandatory payment unit for a “service” (as a tariff).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token’s role is described through participation/governance, not through a tariff payment.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): participation in the DAO and access to rewards are tied to staking BOTTO.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview/quickstart
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs state the staking requirement for a “full DAO member” and for access to rewards.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the DAO votes on fragments and governs themes/parameters using BOTTO participation mechanics.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs describe a community‑governed voting process.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): no strict proof of the irreplaceability of BOTTO (why another asset cannot be used for governance/rewards) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.botto.com/overview
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is utilitarian for the DAO, but the “no other way” argument is not presented.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.botto.com/overview | the process of generating fragments, voting as feedback, weekly mint+auction, list of models |
| Tier‑1 | https://botto.com/app/vote | the “what you can touch” dApp for voting |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.botto.com/details/token-distribution | initial supply and current values of supply/burned/treasury (as of 2024‑11‑30) |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.botto.com/overview/quickstart | addresses of the key BOTTO contracts (Ethereum/Base) and staking requirements |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x9dfad1b7102d46b1b197b90095b5c4e9f5845bba | the onchain BOTTO contract (Ethereum) |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/botto | reference profile |
No comments to display
No comments to display