Skip to main content

Volt Inu

Volt Inu (v2) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Volt Inu — an AI/Other / DeFi / Meme project (an ecosystem with a DEX/bot/games and a volatile utility set), token (symbol: VOLT).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the Volt Inu ecosystem (the VoltiChange DEX, the SparkBot Telegram bot, P2E, NFT) around the VOLT token.
  • Who it’s for: DeFi users and the community interested in DEX/bot trading/P2E mechanics.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for the VOLT token and the onchain operations of the DeFi infrastructure; Tier‑1 materials claim VoltiEco as an “AI‑powered ecosystem” for automating participation in airdrops.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: buys/uses VOLT and interacts with the ecosystem’s products (DEX/bot/games/NFT).
  2. The system does: implements the “deflationary” token mechanics (burn/reflections, etc. at the level of the token/DEX operations) and the ecosystem’s product features.
  3. The user gets: access to the ecosystem’s products and to the token‑economic mechanics.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the VOLT token and related transactions in the networks; the Tier‑1 website states that the token exists on Ethereum/BNB Smart Chain/Polygon.
  5. Token role: the ecosystem’s utility token; details depend on the specific product.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Volt Inu
Also known as (aliases) Volt Inu v2, VOLT, VoltiChange, VoltiEco
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) VOLT
Category AI/Other | DeFi | Meme
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x7f792db54b0e580cdc755178443f0430cf799aca
Token model (token_type) utility (ecosystem)
Max supply 69,000,000,000,000 VOLT (Max Total Supply, Etherscan)
Issuance burn / reflections / treasury / marketing (per the tokenomics on the website)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) the website lists the burn/marketing/treasury/reflections shares (and “0-tax” claims, which require careful reconciliation)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit yes (Solidity Finance audit)
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) VoltiEco ("AI-powered" airdrop automation)
Use‑case (use_case) DeFi ecosystem
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the Tier‑1 website, Volt Inu is an “ecosystem aimed at becoming a one‑stop shop offering DeFi products”, which lists the ecosystem’s products: VoltiChange (DEX), SparkBot (Telegram trading bot), VoltiGames (P2E), VDSC (NFT collection) and VoltiEco.

For the AI context, the key claim is VoltiEco, described as a utility “using A.I. technology, automation and smart contracts to collect airdrops”. The VoltiEco PDF also claims the use of AI and automated algorithms for participation in airdrops.

Features/modules

  • VoltiChange: a DEX/widget with a claimed “deflationary” burn mechanic on trading.
  • SparkBot: a Telegram bot for multi‑chain trading (per the website).
  • VoltiEco (claimed): a protocol/utility for automating participation in airdrops using AI/algorithms/contracts.
  • VoltiGames/VDSC: the game and NFT components of the ecosystem.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user trades/uses the DEX/bot → interacts with the VOLT economy (burn/reflections, etc. per the website’s tokenomics).
  • Scenario 2 (VoltiEco, claimed): the system searches for airdrops → develops contracts/algorithms/oracles → automates the execution of actions for qualification.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: the website claims Ethereum/BNB Smart Chain/Polygon; the passport of this card records Ethereum (Tier‑1 Etherscan).
  • Fees: gas of the respective network + potential fees of the ecosystem’s products.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the VOLT token and a set of applications (DEX/bot/games/NFT).
  • Where logic runs: most of the ecosystem’s product logic is offchain (bot/website), while the token and DeFi operations are onchain.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

The Volt Inu website provides percentage tokenomics parameters (reflections/burn/marketing/treasury) and the claim “0‑TAX TOKEN”.

Important: the same page simultaneously contains blocks with percentage distributions (which looks like “taxes”), so this claim requires additional re‑checking in the contract/whitepaper.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not confirmed by the Tier‑1 sources in this card).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: there is a public Solidity Finance report on the contract (ETH).
  • Bug bounty: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the website and the ecosystem’s products are available.
  • Roadmap: published on the website.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 sources claim VoltiEco as an “AI‑powered ecosystem” for automating participation in airdrops; the specific model/quality metrics are not described.
  • What is truly onchain? The VOLT token (Etherscan) and the onchain operations of the products (DEX/contracts), but the set of addresses of the protocol contracts (other than the token) is not recorded in this card.
  • Why is a token needed? The ecosystem’s utility token; the specific functions are tied to the products and the tokenomics.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): the website lists the same contract address for ETH/BSC/MATIC (possible confusion/error); the “0‑tax” claim conflicts with the display of percentage parameters — re‑checking at the contract/whitepaper level is required.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): VoltiEco is claimed as an “AI‑powered” utility for automating airdrops.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf ; https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a Tier‑1 declaration of an AI direction, but without proof of a working AI model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is no description of a specific AI model/inference as part of a working product.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the document describes the concept/process and automation, but without technical details of the model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 demo/reproducible examples of the AI component at work were found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the PDF is not a demo.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no quality metrics/benchmarks.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a technical description of the AI architecture/versions is absent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are general words about AI/algorithms/oracles, but not the architecture/versions of the model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: VOLT 0x7f792db54b0e580cdc755178443f0430cf799aca
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x7f792db54b0e580cdc755178443f0430cf799aca
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is an onchain token page.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: Tier‑1 confirmation of specific protocol contracts/logic (other than the token) is not recorded.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes the products, but without a list of onchain addresses for verification.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no strict proof of onchain criticality for the main product was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is an ecosystem around a token; criticality is not described in an operational form.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, VOLT.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x7f792db54b0e580cdc755178443f0430cf799aca
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain token page confirms its existence.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 proof of a mandatory payment role of VOLT for a specific service was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the products are listed, but the tariff role of the token is not proven.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): incentive/collateral/slashing mechanics as mandatory protocol security are not confirmed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are burn/reflections parameters, but this is not “staking/slashing” as protocol security.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the token’s governance mechanics are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources in a verifiable form.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the voting/governance process is not described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): no strict proof of the irreplaceability of the native token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://voltinu.in/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token’s role is described in general terms as an “ecosystem token”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://voltinu.in/ the set of ecosystem products, basic claims about VoltiEco and the tokenomics
Tier‑1 https://voltinu.in/VOLTIECO_AI_Powered_Ecosystem.pdf claims about VoltiEco as “AI‑powered” and a description of the concept/process
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x7f792db54b0e580cdc755178443f0430cf799aca onchain parameters of the VOLT token (supply/decimals/address)
Tier‑1 https://solidity.finance/audits/VoltInuETH public audit of the VOLT contract (ETH)
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/volt-inu-2 reference profile

No comments to display

Back to top