Skip to main content

Dimitra

Dimitra — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Dimitra — an AgriTech / AI/Analytics project on Ethereum, token (symbol: DMTR).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform for the digitalization of agriculture (“Connected Farmer”) with ML/AI‑based analytics (per the whitepaper).
  • Who it’s for: farmers, agribusiness and ecosystem partners.
  • Why onchain/token: the DMTR token is used as a utility within the ecosystem; the blockchain is described as a layer for data accounting/security (details of the onchain logic beyond the token are not confirmed in this card).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses the Dimitra platform/modules for farm monitoring/analytics.
  2. The system does: collects data, applies ML/analytics, generates recommendations/reports.
  3. The user gets: analytical insights and management tools.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the DMTR token on Ethereum; other onchain mechanics are not confirmed within this card.
  5. Token role (if any): payment/utility in the ecosystem (per the whitepaper).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Dimitra
Also known as (aliases) DMTR
Logo (logo) ../assets/179_dimitra_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) DMTR
Category AI/Analytics | AgriTech
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x51cB253744189f11241becb29BeDd3F1b5384fdB
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply 999,999,999 DMTR (fixed), decimals: 18
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) max supply ≈ 1B; utility in the ecosystem and staking (per the whitepaper)
Governance company / ecosystem governance (in general terms)
Admins/keys —
Audit yes (CertiK Skynet profile)
Bug bounty —
Team (team) Dimitra Technology (per the website/whitepaper)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) ML/AI analytics for agriculture
Use‑case (use_case) monitoring + optimization of agricultural processes
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 1 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-05

General project overview

Dimitra describes an ecosystem of digital tools for agriculture and agribusiness, including data collection, analytics and ML/AI‑based recommendations. The documents also mention the use of a blockchain for protection/accounting, but within this card the verifiably confirmed item is the onchain fact of the DMTR token.

Features/modules

  • Connected Farmer (platform/product line).
  • ML/AI analytics (agro data, insights).
  • DMTR token as an element of the ecosystem.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the Dimitra platform; an Ethereum wallet — for operations with DMTR.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet.
  • Fees: Ethereum gas.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? ML/AI analytics and recommendations within the agro platform (described in the whitepaper).
  • What is truly onchain? the DMTR token on Ethereum; other onchain logic is not confirmed within this card.
  • Why is a token needed? the ecosystem’s utility token (payment/staking/access — per the whitepaper).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): “blockchain for data” without specific addresses/contracts beyond the token (onchain‑washing risk).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI part is described as functionality (AI_1), not only as an “intent”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a description of ML/AI functions → we count AI_1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the whitepaper describes the use of ML/AI for analytics/insights in the agro platform.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a specific AI function (analytics/recommendations).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): public demos/cases “by link” are not recorded within this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a repeatable demo we do not raise it.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics were not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no detailed technical description of the AI architecture/model versions was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient artifacts for AI_4=1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0x51cB253744189f11241becb29BeDd3F1b5384fdB
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x51cB253744189f11241becb29BeDd3F1b5384fdB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token and its supply/decimals parameters are verifiable.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: other than the token, no specific contracts/addresses for “data accounting/security” are recorded.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no verifiable onchain logic beyond the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the criticality of the blockchain for the product is not proven within this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the DMTR token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x51cB253744189f11241becb29BeDd3F1b5384fdB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token exists.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the whitepaper describes DMTR as a utility token for ecosystem services.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token utility is described in the document.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): staking/incentive mechanics in the ecosystem are claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): staking is described as an element of the token model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the governance role of the token is not confirmed by an unambiguous mechanism in this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the utility (payment/discounts/staking) can also be implemented without a separate token; strict irreplaceability is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no “without the token the product breaks” test.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://dimitra.io/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Dimitra-Whitepaper-1.3-Revised.pdf AI functions and the purpose of the token
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x51cB253744189f11241becb29BeDd3F1b5384fdB onchain facts on DMTR
Tier‑1 https://skynet.certik.com/projects/dimitra audit/security profile (CertiK)