Memes AI

Memes AI (SPL token) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Memes AI in the card’s available Tier‑1 sources looks like a token on the Solana network and a Telegram channel. No public documentation about the product/AI module was found within the available Tier‑1 sources.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: an SPL token on Solana + a community channel.
Who it’s for: community members/traders of Solana tokens.
Why onchain/token: onchain is needed only for issuing/holding the token; the AI component and the token’s utility for an AI service are not confirmed by the card’s Tier‑1 sources.

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	Memes AI
Also known as (aliases)	MemesAI
Logo (logo)	—
Token symbol (ticker)	—
Category	Meme
Primary chain (chain)	Solana
Type	non-EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active (token/channel)
Token (standard)	SPL
Token contract	8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	—
Issuance	—
AI component (ai_component)	unknown
Use‑case (use_case)	meme token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary	0 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	—
Docs	—
GitHub	—
Whitepaper	—
Explorer	https://explorer.solana.com/address/8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk?cluster=mainnet
Telegram	https://t.me/MemesAICoin
X	https://x.com/MemesAICoin
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/memes-ai
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/memesai/

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? Not confirmed by the card’s Tier‑1 sources.
What is truly onchain? The token’s SPL mint address on Solana.
Why is a token needed? Utility beyond a meme asset is not confirmed.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI intent/roadmap was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no Tier‑1 documents/roadmap about AI in this card.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of AI features/models was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The project has no confirmed AI module.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demos/examples of AI functionality were found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The AI part is not confirmed.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —.
Context (version/date/how measured): —.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics are absent.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 technical description of the AI architecture/model versions was found.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmed AI component.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Solana
Addresses/identifiers: SPL mint — 8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk?cluster=mainnet
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token mint is verifiable via the official Solana explorer.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: per Tier‑1, no onchain logic other than the token is confirmed.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no contracts/protocol beyond the SPL mint.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: the criticality of onchain for the product (other than issuing/holding the token) is not proven.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no confirmed onchain product logic.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The project has a token (an SPL mint on Solana).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://explorer.solana.com/address/8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk?cluster=mainnet
Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token is confirmed onchain.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Payment for a service with the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the product/service.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not confirmed per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no tokenomics/incentive rules.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): The governance role of the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are no governance documents/procedure.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): The token’s utility is not confirmed, so the token looks replaceable.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): In the absence of a described utility we set 1, because the necessity of the token in the product is not confirmed.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://explorer.solana.com/address/8D9foi1nqfabp8D3uNJCrzt1xkvxq8xHYH8Lxb4fbonk?cluster=mainnet	The onchain identifier of the token on Solana.