Skip to main content

AIPad

AIPad (AIPAD) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AIPad — a launchpad/platform for participating in token sales (IDO), positioned as a “launchpad for AI projects”; token: AIPAD.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a launchpad platform for participating in IDOs/allocations via a “tier/leaderboard” mechanic.
  • Who it’s for: users who want to participate in token sales; project teams that need a launchpad.
  • Why onchain/token: the AIPAD token is used for holding/staking in order to get access to allocations and platform mechanics (per the description in the docs).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses and, if necessary, stakes AIPAD, passes KYC (per the platform rules).
  2. The system does: assigns a tier/rank per the leaderboard rules and determines the allocation/participation in the IDO.
  3. The user gets: access to participation in offerings (per the rules of the specific sale).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AIPAD token as an onchain asset (the contract and balances/transfers — on the network).
  5. Token role (if any): the AIPAD token — “membership/participation” via holding/staking (claim in the docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AIPad
Also known as (aliases) AIPAD, AIPAD.tech
Logo (logo) ../assets/289_aipad_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AIPAD
Category AI/Meta | Launchpad
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) 2023 (whitepaper dated Feb 2023)
Project status (status) active (website/docs available)
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xE55d97A97ae6A17706ee281486E98A84095d8AAf
Token model (token_type) utility (access + staking)
Max supply 199,758,238.012652430830174258 AIPAD (Etherscan Max Total Supply); the docs claim 200,000,000
Issuance fixed max supply; the docs describe a burn mechanism (a fee on sell orders)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) 7% fee on sales: 5% buyback & burn + 2% burn (docs)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) "AI-launchpad"
Use‑case (use_case) IDO participation via tiers
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary 0 / 1 / 0 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

AIPad is a launchpad platform that describes itself as a venue for projects with an “AI focus”. For the user, the main product is participation in offerings via a tier/leaderboard mechanic, where the participation parameters depend on holding/staking the AIPAD token and meeting the requirements (for example, KYC).

Features/modules

  • a leaderboard/tier system of allocations for participating in IDOs.
  • staking/holding the token as a condition of participation (per the docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user holds/stakes AIPAD for participation → receives a tier/rank → participates in the IDO per the rules.
  • Scenario 2: a user improves their position in the leaderboard (holding the token by days) → receives a greater chance/allocation.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet; operations on Ethereum require a fee in ETH.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (per the token on Etherscan).
  • Fees: network fees (gas) for operations with the token/contracts.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the AIPAD token (ERC‑20), a web interface (website/app), the participation conditions are described in the docs.
  • Where logic runs: part of the participation/accounting logic — offchain (leaderboard/rules), the onchain part is confirmed via the token (balances/transfers).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: holding/staking for tier/participation in IDOs (docs).
  • Issuance/burn: the docs describe a 7% fee on sales, part of which goes to buyback & burn and part to burn.
  • Distribution: the tokenomics page lists the shares (ecosystem/team+advisors/liquidity/staking/seed+private/public/airdrop).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not confirmed in public sources at the level of this card).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (there is no public report on the launchpad smart contracts in the provided Tier‑1 links).
  • Bug bounty: —.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the docs and website are available; the tokenomics are described in GitBook.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? In Tier‑1 sources, AIPad is mainly positioned as a launchpad “for AI projects”; evidence of its own working AI module (what exactly the AI does, demos, metrics, technical description) was not found in the provided Tier‑1 sources.
  • What is truly onchain? The AIPAD token (ERC‑20) exists on the network and is tracked via the explorer.
  • Why is a token needed? Per the docs, the token is needed for holding/staking and participation in the tier/leaderboard system (claim).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): possible AI‑washing (AI as positioning without product artifacts); leaderboard/participation may be implementable without “AI”; double‑check whether there are launchpad smart contracts (other than the token) and public addresses/an audit.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present (partially) 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no explicit roadmap declaration “we are implementing AI module X” as a plan was found in Tier‑1; the positioning “launchpad focused on AI” occurs.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): positioning “about AI” is not equal to a roadmap intent regarding a specific AI module.

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): it is not described which specific AI component performs a function in the product.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.aipad.tech/ ; https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no specifics on “what the AI does” as a functional module.

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a public demo/examples of the AI component’s operation are not presented in the Tier‑1 links of this card.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.aipad.tech/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are product pages, but without a demonstration of AI operation as a verifiable artifact.

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are no quantitative AI quality metrics.

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a technical description of the AI module/models/versions was not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs describe the product as a launchpad, but do not disclose an AI architecture.

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: ERC‑20 AIPAD: 0xE55d97A97ae6A17706ee281486E98A84095d8AAf
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xE55d97A97ae6A17706ee281486E98A84095d8AAf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token and its parameters is verifiable via the explorer.

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): in the provided Tier‑1 sources there is no list of launchpad/staking smart contracts (other than the token) with addresses.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/leaderboard-tier-system
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the rules are described, but the onchain addresses of the logic are not provided.

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): without a blockchain, the launchpad can be implemented as a centralized service; criticality is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the sources do not formulate which key property breaks down without onchain.

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xE55d97A97ae6A17706ee281486E98A84095d8AAf

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the docs contain no statement that fees/the service are paid specifically in AIPAD.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): a utility (hold/stake) is described, but not a “payment token of the service”.

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): participation in the ecosystem requires holding the token; the tier/leaderboard accounts for holding and implies staking/allocations.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/leaderboard-tier-system ; https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): holding/staking is used as an access/incentive mechanism within the platform.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance via the token is not claimed in the provided Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of a DAO/voting.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token’s utility is mainly “gating” (tiers/leaderboard); theoretically replaceable by another access system (irreplaceability is not proven).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/leaderboard-tier-system
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no “without the token the product breaks down” argument in Tier‑1.

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.aipad.tech/ Positioning and product pages of the project.
Tier‑1 https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/overview Official description of AIPad as an AI launchpad (positioning).
Tier‑1 https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/leaderboard-tier-system The leaderboard/tier mechanic of participation in IDOs.
Tier‑1 https://aipad-1.gitbook.io/aipad/tokenomics Tokenomics, fee/burn, distribution.
Tier‑1 https://www.aipad.tech/AIPad_WP.pdf Whitepaper (date, general model and distribution).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xE55d97A97ae6A17706ee281486E98A84095d8AAf Token contract and max total supply on Ethereum.

No comments to display

Back to top