Neurahub
Neurahub (NEURA) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Neurahub — an AI/Assistants / AI/GenAI project: an “all‑in‑one” web app for content generation (text/images/video) and “multi‑agent conversational AI” (per the website and whitepaper). The NEURA token (ERC‑20, Ethereum) is confirmed onchain; the project documentation describes it as a DAO token with a profit‑sharing model (claim).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a web platform/assistant for content generation (text/images/video).
- Who it’s for: content creators, individual users and teams (per the description of “team subscriptions” in the whitepaper).
- Why onchain/token: the NEURA token exists onchain, and the whitepaper/GitBook claim a model of distributing part of the revenue to holders; at the same time, the “critical” onchain logic of the app (other than the token) is not confirmed in Tier‑1 by contract addresses.
- What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the web app → https://chat.neurahub.app
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: launches the Neurahub web app and creates/generates content.
- The system does: provides a set of generative tools (text/images/video) and “multi‑agent conversational AI” (per the positioning).
- The user gets: generated materials and access to the platform’s tools.
- Where the blockchain is: the NEURA ERC‑20 token on Ethereum is confirmed.
- Token role (if any): Tier‑1 claims profit‑sharing (a share of revenue) for holders and DAO tokenomics (claim), but in the extracted Tier‑1 there is no onchain mechanics of distribution/voting with contract addresses.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Neurahub |
| Also known as (aliases) | NEURA, Neurahub app |
| Logo (logo) | — |
| Token symbol (ticker) | NEURA |
| Category | AI/Assistants | AI/GenAI | App |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (profit-sharing) |
| Max supply | 100,000,000 NEURA (Etherscan Max Total Supply) |
| Issuance | fixed (Total supply 100,000,000; per the whitepaper) |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | distribution (whitepaper): liquidity 75%, marketing 10%, ecosystem 10%, team 5% (cliff 3 months + linear unlock 12 months); tax 5% buy/sell (claim). |
| Governance | DAO (claim; whitepaper/GitBook) |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | founders (GitBook): CodeConductor, Pieter, Dave |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | multimodal generative AI assistant |
| Use‑case (use_case) | content generation + assistant |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 2 / 1 / 0 / 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://neurahub.app |
| App | https://chat.neurahub.app |
| Docs | https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub |
| GitHub | https://github.com/theneurahub |
| Releases / Changelog | https://medium.com/@theneurahub |
| Whitepaper | https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f |
| Roadmap | https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub/roadmap |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da |
| X | https://twitter.com/theneurahub |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/theneurahub |
| Medium | https://medium.com/@theneurahub |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/neurahub |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/neurahub/ |
General project overview
Neurahub describes itself as a generative AI platform with an “all‑in‑one AI assistant”, focused on content creation (in particular, image and video generation) and multi‑format scenarios (website). In the whitepaper, the project positions itself as the “ultimate AI platform” with a set of AI utilities and emphasizes “decentralised ownership” and “profit sharing” as elements of a model with DAO tokenomics (claim).
Features/modules
- Web App (claim): access to generative tools via a web interface (GitBook).
- Multi‑modal generation (claim): text/images/video as input and output (website).
- Image/Video generation (claim): generation and “animation” of images (website).
- Code generation (claim): code generation/audit (website).
- NEURA token (claim): tokenomics and profit‑sharing model (GitBook + whitepaper).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: the user opens the web app → generates an image/video from a prompt → gets the result (website).
- Scenario 2: the user holds NEURA → studies the token on Etherscan and the tokenomics in the whitepaper (whitepaper + Etherscan).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: access to the Neurahub web app; an EVM wallet — if the NEURA token is needed.
- Network/chain: Ethereum mainnet for NEURA.
- Fees: gas on Ethereum for onchain operations with the token; use of the app — offchain.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: web app + offchain AI infrastructure + the NEURA ERC‑20 token (Etherscan).
- Participant roles: app users; token holders; team/product operator.
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token; app/generation logic — offchain.
- Dependencies: Ethereum for the token; Neurahub infrastructure for the app.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: the GitBook/whitepaper claim profit‑sharing and “DAO tokenomics” (claim), without a description of the onchain mechanics of payouts/voting with contract addresses.
- Protocol necessity drivers: the necessity of the token for the operation of the app is not proven in the extracted Tier‑1; the token’s role is described as economic/social (profit‑sharing/ownership) (claim).
- Who pays fees: users pay gas on Ethereum for NEURA transfers.
- Where fees go: network fees to Ethereum validators; other onchain fee flows are not confirmed in the extracted Tier‑1.
- Issuance/burn: total supply 100,000,000 (whitepaper); the max total supply is confirmed by Etherscan.
- Security/incentive mechanisms: incentivizing holders via profit‑sharing (claim).
- Distribution and token issuance schedule: the distribution and team vesting are described in the whitepaper.
- Treasury: — (addresses are not given in the extracted Tier‑1).
Governance
- Who makes decisions: DAO (claim; whitepaper/GitBook), but the specific onchain voting process/contracts were not extracted.
- How protocol parameters change: —.
- Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
- Keys/multisig: —.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: central dependence on the offchain platform; absence of confirmed onchain contracts of the app other than the token; the claimed profit-sharing is, moreover, not confirmed by addresses or a payout mechanism.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the website and web app are available; the NEURA token exists on Ethereum.
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: general text without specific public technical releases (GitBook roadmap).
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: Ethereum (NEURA); Telegram mini app (claim; GitBook).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: access to the app is public; the onchain artifact of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? generative functions (text/images/video) and an “AI assistant” are described on the website and in the whitepaper.
- What is truly onchain? the NEURA ERC‑20 token on Ethereum.
- Why is a token needed? the GitBook/whitepaper claim ownership/profit‑sharing elements for holders (claim); the onchain payout mechanics are not confirmed by addresses.
- Red flags (based on the information found): the AI description is mostly product marketing (without model quality metrics); profit‑sharing is claimed without verifiable onchain payout/treasury contracts.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | medium | 2 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI functions are described as an existing product/platform; the intent flag is not needed.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): intent is applied when AI is only “in the plans”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the platform provides generative functions (content generation: images/video, etc.) and an AI assistant.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the types of AI functions and the purpose of the platform are listed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): there is a public entry point to the web app (“Launch App / Get started”).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://chat.neurahub.app
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): public access to the app makes it possible to verify the existence of the product.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: — (there are no model quality metrics/benchmarks in the extracted Tier‑1).
- Context (version/date/how measured): —.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are marketing usage counters, but not AI quality metrics.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): there is no detailed model architecture/versions in the extracted Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the document describes the product/market and tokenomics, but not the AI stack.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: NEURA token: 0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the explorer confirms the contract and max total supply.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: in the extracted Tier‑1 there are no addresses of app/payout/DAO voting contracts other than the token.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): claims are insufficient without onchain artifacts.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: the generative app can work as a regular SaaS without a blockchain; onchain criticality is not proven.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the core UX (content generation) does not require a blockchain.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, NEURA (ERC‑20 on Ethereum).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain and described in the whitepaper.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the extracted Tier‑1 do not state that access/subscription to the app is paid specifically in NEURA.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper talks about trial/subscriptions, but does not link payment to the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the GitBook claims that NEURA holders “share in 50% of the revenue generated by the platform” (profit‑sharing claim).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 explicitly describes an incentive for token holders.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): in the extracted Tier‑1 there is no description of a specific governance process/venue/voting contracts for NEURA.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub ; https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): “DAO/collective decision-making” is mentioned in general terms.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): the profit‑sharing/discount model can be implemented offchain without its own token; the protocol necessity of the token is not proven.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://neurahub.app ; https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the extracted Tier‑1 there are no mandatory onchain mechanics where the product breaks without the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://neurahub.app | Product positioning (generative functions, multi‑modal claim) and the public entry point. |
| Tier‑1 | https://chat.neurahub.app | Public access to the web app (demo indicator). |
| Tier‑1 | https://neurahubs-organization.gitbook.io/theneurahub | Project description and the claim about revenue share for NEURA holders; founders. |
| Tier‑1 | https://1792491778-files.gitbook.io/~/files/v0/b/gitbook-x-prod.appspot.com/o/spaces%2FGn6GbVsiSnn2ZzVapiuZ%2Fuploads%2FtFOf84N3dJIf6PH1Zxqa%2FNeurahub%20Whitepaper%20V1.1%20ENG.pdf?alt=media&token=2bec3c5b-f9de-4936-8371-1077a75a606f | Whitepaper: tokenomics (100M supply, distribution, tax) and description of the product/model. |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x3d1c949a761c11e4cc50c3ae6bdb0f24fd7a39da | Onchain NEURA token (Ethereum), max total supply and contract. |
No comments to display
No comments to display