Skip to main content

Only1 / Wink

Only1 / Wink (LIKE) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Wink (Only1) — a Social / Payments / AI/Discovery project on Solana: a membership‑oriented platform for creators and fans (Passes/subscriptions, messenger/content types, marketplace). The AI component in the extracted Tier‑1 is Explore: content search “Powered by OpenAI CLIP” (docs). The SPL token LIKE (mint) and the tokenomics wallets are confirmed onchain (docs).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a social creator platform with membership mechanics and a marketplace.
  • Who it’s for: content creators and their subscribers/fans.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is used for wallets/payments on Solana; the LIKE token is described in the docs as the platform’s utility token (staking/rewards/buyback&burn), but the primary payment currency on the platform is USDC (docs).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: a creator launches Passes/subscriptions; a fan buys a membership and/or sends tips/PPV (docs).
  2. The system does: processes self‑custodial payments on Solana (USDC) and provides tools for creators (CRM/analytics/messenger) (docs).
  3. The user gets: access to content/communication and the ability to resell Passes on the marketplace (docs).
  4. Where the blockchain is: a wallet is created/linked to the profile; payments/operations take place on Solana; gasless UX is achieved via relayers, which pay SOL, while users pay in USDC (docs).
  5. Token role (if any): LIKE is described as a utility token: buyback&burn, creator staking, community rewards (docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Only1 / Wink
Also known as (aliases) Wink, Try Wink, Only1, LIKE
Logo (logo) ../assets/277_only1_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) LIKE
Category AI/Discovery | Social | Payments
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract 3bRTivrVsitbmCTGtqwp7hxXPsybkjn4XLNtPsHqa3zR
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply 500,000,000 LIKE (docs)
Issuance fixed supply (docs total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) buyback & burn (from platform profits, claim); creator staking/rewards (docs)
Governance company
Admins/keys —
Audit — (the roadmap contains the claim “smart contract audited by Kudelski Security”)
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) $3.5m venture funding (claim); developer grant Solana Foundation (claim)
AI component (ai_component) Explore search on OpenAI CLIP
Use‑case (use_case) memberships + tipping + marketplace
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 0 / 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Wink (Only1) is described in the documentation as a membership platform for creators and fans with self‑custodial payments and a set of tools (Memberships, Messenger, Marketplace, CRM). For users there is content search/discovery Explore, which is explicitly described as based on OpenAI CLIP (visual concept LLM). The payment currency on the platform is USDC on the Solana network; gasless UX is implemented via relayers (docs).

Features/modules

  • Memberships: Passes (lifetime, transferable, resellable) and subscriptions (coming soon) (docs).
  • Messenger: direct messages, tipping, PPV content (docs).
  • Marketplace: resale of Passes between users (docs).
  • Explore (AI): content search by visual concepts based on OpenAI CLIP (docs).
  • Payments/wallets: social login + creation of a non‑custodial wallet (Web3Auth); pay with card for USDC top‑up (docs).
  • Gasless transactions: relayers pay SOL fees, the user pays in USDC (docs).
  • LIKE token: the platform’s utility token (docs: buyback&burn, rewards, staking).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (creator): a creator launches Passes → fans buy a membership → get access to content (docs).
  • Scenario 2 (fan): a fan searches for content in Explore → uses search by visual concepts → finds accounts/posts (docs).
  • Scenario 3 (payments): a user tops up USDC → buys/pays tips/PPV → the relayer provides gasless UX (docs).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: social login (Gmail/Discord/X/Reddit, etc.) or login via Solana wallets (Phantom/Glow/Solflare) (docs).
  • Network/chain: Solana mainnet.
  • Fees: per the docs, relayers pay SOL fees; the user interacts via USDC top‑up (gasless UX — coming soon, the principle is described).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web platform (offchain) + Solana wallets/payments (onchain) + the SPL token LIKE (docs).
  • Participant roles: creators, fans, the platform (operator), relayers (pay network fees) (docs).
  • Where logic runs: offchain — UI/CRM/messenger and integrations; onchain — payments/transfers and the LIKE token.
  • Dependencies: Solana; Web3Auth (social login); on‑ramp provider (pay with card).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: buyback & burn (a share of platform profits); community rewards; creator staking pools (docs).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the token utility is described as part of the economic layer; at the same time, the “primary payment currency” on the platform is USDC (docs).
  • Who pays fees: on Solana fees are paid in SOL; per the docs, the relayer pays SOL fees for users (gasless UX principle).
  • Where fees go: to Solana validators (network fees).
  • Issuance/burn: total supply 500,000,000 LIKE (docs); buyback & burn is described as a deflation mechanism (docs).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: creator staking/rewards and event‑based airdrops (docs).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: — (in the extracted Tier‑1 the allocation table on the “Token Allocation” page was not obtained; separate extraction/verification is required).
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: company.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: — (the roadmap contains the claim “Smart contract audited by Kudelski Security”, but a public audit report was not extracted).
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: centralized dependence on the offchain service/relayers; absence of public addresses of the onchain programs for Passes/marketplace in the extracted Tier‑1; the AI component (Explore) depends on OpenAI CLIP.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the docs were updated in Feb 2025; the product pages are described as operational; some features are marked “Coming Soon” (docs).
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/about/roadmap

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: Web3Auth (social login); Solana wallets (Phantom/Glow/Solflare); on‑ramp partner (pay with card) (docs).
  • Partners: Solana Foundation grant (claim in the roadmap).
  • Where it’s actually used: membership/marketplace/messenger and AI Explore are described in the docs as core modules.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Explore uses OpenAI CLIP (visual concept LLM) for content search/discovery (docs).
  • What is truly onchain? payments/wallets on Solana; the LIKE token (mint) and the addresses of some tokenomics wallets (docs).
  • Why is a token needed? LIKE is described as a utility token (buyback&burn/rewards/creator staking), but the primary payment currency is USDC (docs).
  • Red flags (based on the information found): the AI component is limited to search/ranking (not a “decentralized AI” protocol); the onchain part of the product (Passes/marketplace) is described without program addresses in the extracted Tier‑1; the token utility may be replaceable (USDC is the primary currency).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the AI component is described as part of the product (Explore), without a separate roadmap intent that would add verifiability.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the intent item is not needed: there is a specific description of the AI function (AI_1).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Explore is content/creator search based on OpenAI CLIP (visual concept LLM).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the AI function is described explicitly.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): in the extracted Tier‑1 there is no reproducible demo/instruction that allows verifying the quality of Explore search.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a description and a GIF, but no test procedure/benchmarks.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): search quality/relevance metrics are not published.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): apart from the mention of “Powered by OpenAI CLIP”, the architecture/versions/parameters of the AI part are not disclosed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): insufficient for a technical proof.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: LIKE token mint: 3bRTivrVsitbmCTGtqwp7hxXPsybkjn4XLNtPsHqa3zR
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-tokenomics/basic-information
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the address (mint) is published in the official docs.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: the product clearly interacts with Solana (membership, marketplace, payments), but in the extracted Tier‑1 the addresses of the onchain programs/contracts for Passes/marketplace/the relayer system are not published.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/memberships ; https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/marketplace ; https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/benefits/gasless-transaction
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without addresses/contracts, confirmed onchain logic beyond the token cannot be credited.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: a similar creator platform can be built with centralized billing; in Tier‑1 it is not proven that onchain is critical (rather UX/self‑custody).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain is used, but “criticality” is not formally proven.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, LIKE.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-tokenomics/basic-information
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token mint is published in the docs.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the primary payment token on the platform is USDC, not LIKE.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/benefits/pay-with-card
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the docs explicitly say “primary payment currency … USDC (Solana)”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token utility includes creator staking pools and community rewards/airdrops.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink ; https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the utility is described in the docs as a reward/staking mechanic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the governance role of LIKE is not described in the extracted Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of a DAO/voting.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): since payments on the platform are tied to USDC, the LIKE utility looks partially replaceable (rather rewards/staking).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/benefits/pay-with-card ; https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): “primary payment currency USDC” reduces the necessity of LIKE as a settlement token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink Product overview, description of LIKE utilities (buyback/staking/rewards).
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/explore The AI component Explore: OpenAI CLIP.
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/memberships Passes/subscriptions, transferability/resale.
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/product/marketplace Marketplace for reselling Passes.
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/benefits/pay-with-card Payment currency USDC; top‑up via on‑ramp.
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/benefits/gasless-transaction The relayer principle of “gasless” on Solana (fees paid by the relayer).
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-tokenomics/basic-information Token basics: Solana, total supply 500M, mint.
Tier‑1 https://trywink.gitbook.io/wink/crypto/like-tokenomics/wallets Addresses of the key tokenomics wallets.
Tier‑2 https://kudelskisecurity.com/ The roadmap mentions an audit (without an extracted report).

No comments to display

Back to top