Skip to main content

QnA3.AI

QnA3.AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

QnA3.AI — an AI‑relevant Web3 application on the BNB Smart Chain network, token (symbol: GPT).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an application with AI Q&A and features for working with Web3 content/data (per the description in the official docs).
  • Who it’s for: users who need search/answers and orientation in Web3 topics based on the project’s product.
  • Why onchain/token: the GPT token is described as a means of access to features/quotas and of participation in governance; the token itself exists as a BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: asks a question/search query in the product.
  2. The system does: processes the query with the model and the knowledge/knowledge graph described in the docs.
  3. The user gets: an answer/results and (per the description in the docs) additional features around analysis/navigation on the topic.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the GPT token is deployed as a BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain; no Tier‑1 confirmation of separate protocol‑level onchain logic (other than the token) was found in this card.
  5. Token role (if any): the GPT token is described as a utility token for access/quotas and governance (see Evidence).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name QnA3.AI
Also known as (aliases) QnA3; QNA3.AI; GPT
Logo (logo) ../assets/331_qna3ai_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) GPT
Category AI/Other | Consumer
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x30842a9c941d9DE3AF582c41ad12b11D776ba69e
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply 999,999,999.999999
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) access/quotas and governance (described in the docs)
Governance DAO
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI Q&A + Web3 knowledge graph
Use‑case (use_case) Web3 search + Q&A
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 3 / evidence_score 0
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the official documentation, QnA3.AI describes the product as an AI‑oriented application for working with questions/answers and Web3 knowledge. The docs mention the project’s own model(s) and an industry knowledge graph, as well as a set of features around analysis and navigation on Web3 topics.

Within DecAIHub, it is important to separate: (1) what exactly is claimed as the AI component and how it manifests for the user, (2) what is truly onchain (in this card, the onchain fact of the token’s existence is confirmed), (3) why a token is needed (the docs describe the utility role of the GPT token).

Features/modules

  • AI Agent / Q&A: processing queries and returning answers (per the description in the docs).
  • Data/analytics: the docs mention indicators/a news base and analytical features (as product functionality, without a quality assessment).
  • Token mechanics: the use of GPT for access/quotas and governance (per the description in the docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user asks a question → gets an answer/results.
  • Scenario 2: a user uses the product’s features to orient themselves in a topic → gets structured information/a summary (per the description in the docs).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: open the project’s website/docs; account/wallet requirements for specific features — see the docs.
  • Network/chain: the GPT token — on BNB Smart Chain.
  • Fees: BNB Smart Chain network fees apply to operations with the token; fees/terms inside the application — see the docs.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: within this card, the GPT token contract (BEP‑20) is confirmed. The architecture of the other product components requires separate re‑checking per Tier‑1.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — token operations; offchain — the main application logic (by common sense; no separate Tier‑1 description of the product architecture is recorded in this card).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: the docs describe scenarios where GPT is used to expand query quotas/access to features, as well as for governance mechanics.
  • Staking/governance model: the docs mention staking and a ve33 model (the details require separate verification per the Tier‑1 tokenomics sections).
  • Issuance: BscScan lists the max total supply (see Evidence).

Governance

  • Claimed model: the docs describe a Governance DAO (the details of the voting processes/tools are not recorded per Tier‑1 in this card).

Security and incidents

  • Audits/Bug bounty: no Tier‑1 confirmations were found.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: an active product/the docs are available.
  • Roadmap: see the official docs (links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations/partners: not recorded per Tier‑1 (re‑checking against primary sources is needed).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The official docs describe AI Q&A features and the use of a model/knowledge graph as the basis of the product.
  • What is truly onchain? The fact of the existence of the GPT token as a BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain is confirmed; separate protocol‑level onchain logic of the product (other than the token) is not confirmed in this card.
  • Why is a token needed? In the docs, the GPT token is described as a utility token for access/quotas and governance mechanics.
  • Red flags / what to double‑check: (1) the architecture and boundaries of the AI component (which part is “its own”, which dependencies), (2) whether there is onchain logic apart from the token, (3) the exact rules of using GPT (quotas/staking/rights).

DecAI Fit flags (0/1) and calculation

  • AI: AI_0=0; AI_1=1; AI_2 (decision): 0; AI_3=0; AI_4=0 → ai_score=1
  • Onchain: OC_1=1; OC_2=0; OC_3=0 → onchain_score=1
  • Token: TK_0=0; TK_1=1; TK_2=1; TK_3=1; TK_4=0 → token_score=3
  • Evidence: E_AI_T1=1; E_OC_T1=1; E_TK_T1=1; E_only_T3=0 → evidence_score=3
  • Summary: S=8 → decai_fit_base=4 → AI cap=3 → DecAI Fit=3/6

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 0
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 roadmap/official statement of “AI as an intention” is recorded separately; there is a description of the product’s AI features.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/product-overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 description of AI features (AI_1), but a separate roadmap intent without confirmation of the features is not singled out as AI_0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the docs describe AI Q&A/AI Agent features and the use of a model and a web3 knowledge graph for answers/navigation.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/product-overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a Tier‑1 description of what exactly the AI part of the product does at the level of user‑facing features.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a public demo/guide of “what you can touch” as a reproducible tutorial is not recorded per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 “demo/app/quickstart” artifact, the flag is not raised.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no quality metrics/benchmarks of the model/system were found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture/versions of the model are not recorded per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without Tier‑1 tech docs on the architecture/versions, the flag remains 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: GPT token (BEP‑20): 0x30842a9c941d9DE3AF582c41ad12b11D776ba69e
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x30842a9c941d9DE3AF582c41ad12b11D776ba69e
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 onchain artifact (the token contract) in a public explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: no confirmation of onchain logic of the product (other than the token) was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 description of the onchain mechanics/contracts of the product (other than the token), the flag remains 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not proven that a key property of the product breaks down without the blockchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 “blockchain‑critical” argument, hence 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the GPT token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x30842a9c941d9DE3AF582c41ad12b11D776ba69e
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain token page confirms the existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the docs describe the use of GPT to expand query quotas/access to features.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/about-usdgpt-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes a scenario of paying with/using the token for access to the product’s capabilities.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the docs describe reward/dividend and buy‑back mechanics for GPT holders in connection with the features.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/about-usdgpt-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 text directly describes incentives/rewards tied to holding/using the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the docs describe governance rights via staking and a ve33 model.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/about-usdgpt-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 text describes governance mechanics via the token and staking.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 argument of “can be replaced without loss of meaning” was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a Tier‑1 justification of replaceability/irreplaceability, the flag remains 0 (conservatively).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/product-overview Describes the AI Q&A features, the model and the web3 knowledge graph as the basis of the product.
Tier‑1 https://docs.qna3.ai/qna3.ai-documents/qna3.ai-docs/about-usdgpt-token Describes the utility scenarios of the GPT token (quotas/access, governance mechanics, staking).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x30842a9c941d9DE3AF582c41ad12b11D776ba69e Onchain fact: the QnA3.AI Token (GPT) as a BEP‑20, the contract and max total supply.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “there is protocol‑level onchain logic of the product (other than the token)” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top