Skip to main content

TradeTide

TradeTide — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

TradeTide — an AI/Agents | DeFi project with the TTD token (BEP‑20; BNB Smart Chain).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an AI service/platform that helps analyze the market and (per the project’s description) leads to the automation of trade execution via CEX/DEX.
  • Who it’s for: retail traders, advanced users and developers of strategies/agents.
  • Why onchain/token: the TTD token is described as a means of access/payment for modules, incentives and governance; the product itself mostly looks like an offchain service + integrations with trading venues.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): a public chat interface (demo) and documentation describing the modules (analysis/backtesting/execution).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: specifies a ticker/token address or a scenario.
  2. The system does: generates an AI analysis and (per the roadmap) can validate a strategy via a backtest.
  3. The user gets: recommendations/signals and (per the project’s claim) the ability to move on to execution automation.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the onchain artifact that can be verified directly — the TTD token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
  5. Token role: access/payment for modules, rewards to infrastructure participants, governance (per the project documentation).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name TradeTide
Also known as (aliases) TradeTide AI; TTD
Logo (logo) ../assets/321_tradetide_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) TTD
Category AI/Agents | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x169eC30125728BC7912Da2dF76Ab5f97F3BAB9cB
Token model (token_type) utility (governance)
Max supply 1 000 000 000 TTD
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Per the documentation: fixed supply; a significant part is allocated to emissions for incentives (GPU providers / execution nodes / strategy developers / DAO stakers).
Governance DAO (as claimed)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI analysis + trading agent orchestration
Use‑case (use_case) market analysis → backtesting → (plan) auto-execution
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 3 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 3 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

TradeTide is positioned as an execution‑first AI trading agent: the system connects “AI insights” with a strategy validation module (backtest) and with an execution layer (under development) via integrations with CEX/DEX. In the documentation, the project describes a multi‑layer architecture (data → AI models → backtest → execution → agent orchestration) and the role of the TTD token in access to modules, payment and incentives for infrastructure participants.

Features/modules

  • AI analysis: generation of technical analysis and trading hints on the user’s request.
  • Backtesting engine: a strategy simulation/validation module (described as part of the product).
  • Execution layer (roadmap): execution automation via integrations with exchanges/DEX (per the project’s claim).
  • Strategy marketplace (roadmap): a market for strategies/modules with payment in TTD (per the documentation).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: the user enters a ticker/address → receives an AI analysis and basic recommendations.
  • Scenario 2: the user validates a strategy via a backtest → (per the roadmap) connects execution automation.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the demo/app; for onchain operations with the token — an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (TTD — BEP‑20).
  • Fees: depend on onchain operations and network fees.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: web interface + data/analytics layer + backtest + (per the description) execution layer.
  • Where logic runs: AI/analytics and execution via integrations — predominantly offchain; onchain — the token and the economic mechanics around it.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: per the documentation, TTD is used for access to advanced features, payment for execution modules/the marketplace and in governance.
  • Incentives: an emission model of rewards to network participants is described (GPU providers / execution nodes / strategy developers / DAO stakers).
  • Supply: fixed (1 000 000 000 TTD).

Governance

  • Governance format: a DAO governance token is claimed; the details of the governance process and the artifacts (for example, governance contracts/a voting platform) are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: no Tier‑1 confirmation of audits was found.
  • Bug bounty: no Tier‑1 confirmation of a bug bounty program was found.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Per the documentation: a set of “AI insight layer” modules (LLM orchestration + specialized models) for analysis and generation of trading insights; orchestration of autonomous agents is also described.
  • What is truly onchain? The verifiable onchain artifact — the TTD token on the BNB Smart Chain network.
  • Why is a token needed? Per the documentation: access/payment for features and modules, incentives for infrastructure participants, governance.
  • Red flags (what to double‑check):
    • In the “execution nodes / decentralized infra” part there are many roadmap‑level claims — confirmations via releases/working components are needed.
    • No public Tier‑1 confirmations of audits/bug bounty were found.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality high 3
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is not only intent: the Tier‑1 documentation describes the product’s AI modules.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/6-product-architecture
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the intent flag is not needed, since there is a Tier‑1 description of the AI part of the product (AI_1/AI_4).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the AI layer generates market analysis/insights and orchestrates specialized models (time‑series, pattern recognition, anomaly models).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/6-product-architecture
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a specific description of the AI layer’s functions and model types.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a public demo interface for requests to the AI analysis.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://chat.tradetide.cc/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is “what you can touch” (app/demo) from the official documentation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no quantitative quality metrics/benchmarks were found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a modular architecture is described (data layer, AI insight layer, backtesting, execution, orchestration).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/6-product-architecture
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a structured description of the components and interactions.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: TTD token contract 0x169eC30125728BC7912Da2dF76Ab5f97F3BAB9cB
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x169eC30125728BC7912Da2dF76Ab5f97F3BAB9cB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain artifact is verifiable directly via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no confirmation of useful onchain logic beyond the token was found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the product is described as an AI service/integrations; onchain criticality is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): there is a token (TTD).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x169eC30125728BC7912Da2dF76Ab5f97F3BAB9cB
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): execution modules and subscriptions/fees are described as payable in TTD.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/7-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the role of the token as a means of payment is described in the token utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): emissions/rewards to infrastructure participants are described (GPU/execution/strategy/DAO staking).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/8-tokenomics-overview
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics describe an emission model and the categories of recipients.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): TTD is claimed as a governance asset for the DAO.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/7-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the governance utility is stated explicitly.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token with USDC/a subscription without loss of meaning is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 proof of “can be replaced without loss of meaning”, so conservatively 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/6-product-architecture Tier‑1 description of the architecture and the AI layer (which models/layers are claimed).
Tier‑1 https://chat.tradetide.cc/ A demo interface (“what you can touch”) for AI analysis is available.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x169eC30125728BC7912Da2dF76Ab5f97F3BAB9cB The TTD token contract on the BNB Smart Chain network.
Tier‑1 https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/7-token-utility Claimed token utility: access/payment for modules, incentives, governance.
Tier‑1 https://tradetide-1.gitbook.io/tradetide/8-tokenomics-overview Fixed supply of 1B TTD and the general tokenomics/emissions scheme.

No comments to display

Back to top