Skip to main content

Orbit

Orbit — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Orbit — a DeFi utility positioned as a DeFAI companion; token: GRIFT (Solana, SPL).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an interface/assistant for actions in DeFi, positioned on the website as a “DeFAI companion”.
  • Who it’s for: DeFi users who need a “single entry point” for operations and integrations.
  • Why onchain/token: the onchain artifact is an SPL token on Solana; in the Tier‑1 tokenomics the token is described as a mechanism for platform access/token gating and buybacks/rewards.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://chat.orbitcryptoai.com (the product interface).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: formulates a task/operation in DeFi (swap/bridge/interaction with protocols).
  2. The system does: uses integrations with DeFi services and aggregators (per the website description).
  3. The user gets: a prepared/automated sequence of actions (per the positioning).
  4. Where the blockchain is: operations are executed in DeFi networks; the project’s token is on Solana.
  5. Token role: not established per Tier‑1 (docs/whitepaper are needed).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Orbit
Also known as (aliases) Orbit, Orbit AI, GRIFT
Logo (logo) ../assets/314_orbit-ai_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) GRIFT
Category AI/Other | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract GekTNfm84QfyP2GdAHZ5AgACBRd69aNmgA5FDhZupump
Token model (token_type) utility (access + rewards)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) DeFAI companion
Use‑case (use_case) DeFi operations via integrations + aggregation
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

On the official website, Orbit is positioned as a “DeFAI companion” for working with DeFi: the goal is to simplify interactions with protocols through integrations and automation. No Tier‑1 technical description of the AI part (model/architecture/metrics) was found.

Features/modules

  • DeFAI companion (positioning): an assistant/interface for DeFi operations.
  • A set of integrations (per the website): brands/services with which the project claims compatibility are listed.
  • Onchain artifact: the GRIFT SPL token on the Solana network.

Typical scenarios

  • DeFi user: wants to perform a swap/bridge/operation → uses Orbit as the interface (per the project’s positioning).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet (for onchain operations with the token) and access to the project’s website/channels.
  • Network/chain: Solana (the GRIFT token).
  • Fees: Solana fees for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: a web interface/service + an onchain token (SPL).
  • Participant roles: DeFi users; the team/service operators (offchain part).
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the rest of the logic (integrations/automation) — as a service, per the project’s description.
  • Dependencies: Solana infrastructure + external DeFi protocols/aggregators (per the positioning).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

There is an onchain artifact of an SPL token on Solana. In the Tier‑1 tokenomics the token is described as a mechanism for platform access/token gating and buybacks/rewards.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The website uses the “DeFAI companion” positioning, but no Tier‑1 description of the AI component (what exactly the AI does, how it is verified) was found.
  • What is truly onchain? The GRIFT token on Solana (SPL).
  • Why is a token needed? The Tier‑1 tokenomics claims platform access/token gating and buybacks/rewards.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): DeFAI positioning without a tech description/metrics; non‑obvious token utility; the absence of Tier‑1 documentation on risks and limitations.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partially present 2

Governance

  • Governance format: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: key risks — a lack of verifiable documentation, the risk of wrong expectations from “automation” and the absence of clear limitations/responsibility.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: an active website/project channels; “Releases/Changelog” is not specified.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: the website lists external DeFi services/brands as part of the positioning; the completeness and status of the integrations require separate verification.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: not established per Tier‑1.
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): There are signs of AI reality per Tier‑1 (see AI_1..AI_4), so the AI_0 flag (intent‑only) does not apply.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — see Evidence/links in AI_1..AI_4.
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0=1 is admissible only when AI_1..AI_4=0; here ai_score without AI_0 = 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of “what exactly the AI does” at the level of a verifiable function was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has positioning, but no technical specifics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 sources include an accessible product interface (chat/app).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/about ; https://chat.orbitcryptoai.com
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This provides a “demo surface” (what you can touch); at the same time, there is no Tier‑1 tech description/metrics of the AI component (AI_3..AI_4 remain 0).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics of the AI part are not published per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI part (architecture/versions/model) was not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a tech description, AI_4 cannot be confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: GRIFT SPL: GekTNfm84QfyP2GdAHZ5AgACBRd69aNmgA5FDhZupump
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/GekTNfm84QfyP2GdAHZ5AgACBRd69aNmgA5FDhZupump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact with the token identifier.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): OC_2 requires artifacts/a description of onchain logic beyond the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not proven per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no sufficient justification of “why the blockchain is critical”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has an SPL token, GRIFT (Solana).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/GekTNfm84QfyP2GdAHZ5AgACBRd69aNmgA5FDhZupump
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token’s onchain artifact is available.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The utility of the token as payment for the service is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 tokenomics describes token gating and buybacks/rewards, but a “pay‑per‑service” payment use case is not explicitly singled out.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Staking/collateral/penalties via the token are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 description of the tokenomics/incentive mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of a governance procedure.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): To confirm replaceability, an explicit justification/payment model is needed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/ Official positioning of Orbit as a DeFAI companion for DeFi (AI intent).
Tier‑1 https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/tokenomics Tokenomics: the $GRIFT token, token address, claimed utility (token gating; buybacks/rewards).
Tier‑1 https://www.orbitcryptoai.com/about Tier‑1 description of the product and a link to the interface (chat/app) as a demo surface.
Tier‑1 https://chat.orbitcryptoai.com The product interface (what you can touch).
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/GekTNfm84QfyP2GdAHZ5AgACBRd69aNmgA5FDhZupump Onchain artifact: an SPL token on Solana.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/orbit-3 Reference token profile and links (context).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/orbit-ai/ Reference token profile and links (context).

No comments to display

Back to top