Skip to main content

NetVRk

NetVRk — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

NetVRk — a project in the Metaverse/Gaming segment (Ethereum), token: NETVR.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a metaverse platform and UGC environment where users create and use digital assets.
  • Who it’s for: metaverse users, creators of 3D content/experiences, brands and event organizers.
  • Why onchain/token: NFTs — for ownership of digital assets, the NETVR token — for in‑game transactions and some payments/staking.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: enters the metaverse and uses content/games/social spaces.
  2. The system does: provides creation tools (Creation Engine) and publishes part of the assets as NFTs.
  3. The user gets: digital assets/items and the ability to trade them/use them in experiences.
  4. Where the blockchain is: NFT ownership and tokens (contracts and addresses are public).
  5. Token role: NETVR is used as the currency for part of the in‑game operations and for staking (per the project docs).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name NetVRk
Also known as (aliases) NETVR, NetVRk
Logo (logo) ../assets/311_netvrk_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) NETVR
Category Gaming | Metaverse
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x52498F8d9791736f1D6398fE95ba3BD868114d10
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + staking)
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) in‑game payments; NETVR staking (per the project docs)
Governance DAO (Snapshot; NFT membership)
Admins/keys —
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) —
Use‑case (use_case) metaverse, UGC, NFT assets
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 0 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

NetVRk is positioned as a metaverse platform with the ability to create digital assets and publish some of them as NFTs. The project documentation separately describes the NFT collections, the token contract(s) and the staking‑related mechanics.

Features/modules

  • Creation Engine: tools for creating 3D assets and experiences.
  • NFT assets: ownership and exchange of some objects/items via NFTs.
  • Game modes/experiences: including blockchain games with NFTs and in‑game items.

Typical scenarios

  • Content creator: makes a 3D asset → mints it as an NFT → sells/uses it in the metaverse.
  • Player: uses an avatar/items/NFTs → gets game items/rewards (per the rules of the specific game).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a wallet for EVM networks (for example, to interact with NFTs/the token).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (the docs also mention Polygon for the token).
  • Fees: network fees for operations with contracts (mint/transfer/staking).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Onchain: the ERC‑20 token, NFT contracts, staking contracts (addresses are published in the project documentation).
  • Offchain: the metaverse/game client and creation tools.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • In the project docs, the NETVR token is described as the main token for part of the in‑game transactions (buying assets, paying for NFT minting) and for staking.
  • Governance (DAO) is described in the docs as Snapshot voting linked to ownership of certain NFTs.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: a DAO model with voting on Snapshot is described (membership via NFT ownership).
  • How parameters/decisions change: no detailed rules (thresholds/procedures) were found per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: the documentation and communication channels are active; the product is positioned as a metaverse platform.
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: published in the documentation (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: the documentation mentions game/metaverse scenarios and NFT collections; the detailed list of integrations requires separate verification.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: the basic scenarios and the description of components are given in the official documentation (see links_*).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? No Tier‑1 source was found that describes an AI component as part of the product/protocol.
  • What is truly onchain? The token and NFT contracts, as well as the staking contracts; the addresses are published in the docs.
  • Why is a token needed? The docs specify the use of NETVR for in‑game transactions and NFT minting, as well as for staking.
  • Red flags and what to double‑check: if the project claims AI features (for example, in communications/marketing), a Tier‑1 artifact describing “what the AI does” and how it is verified is needed.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
Component Level Score
AI reality low 0
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 partially present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 AI intent (as a plan/direction) was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Per Tier‑1, an AI direction as part of the product is not recorded.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of an AI component (model/agent/function) in the product was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a description of the metaverse/Creation Engine, but without an AI component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demo/guide confirming an AI feature was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the product does not confirm an AI feature.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics of the AI part are not recorded per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No technical description of the AI part was found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without a tech description, AI_4 cannot be confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: NETVR ERC‑20: 0x52498F8d9791736f1D6398fE95ba3BD868114d10
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/contracts
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation publishes the contract addresses.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: NFT contracts and staking contracts (beyond the token).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/contracts
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Separate NFT and staking contracts are published, i.e. the onchain layer is not limited to the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not proven per Tier‑1 that a key property of the product breaks down without onchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Per Tier‑1, there is no sufficient justification of the criticality of the onchain layer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, NETVR.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/the-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token and its role are described in the official documentation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The NETVR token is used for in‑game transactions (asset purchases/payment for operations).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/the-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 source lists the ways the token is used within the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The documentation mentions staking of the NETVR token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/the-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes staking as one of the ways the token is used.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/netvrk-dao
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The DAO model is described via NFT membership; no explicit role of the NETVR token in voting is recorded.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/the-token
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): A conclusion about replaceability requires a separate comparison of payment mechanics and the role of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.netvrk.co/ The project describes NetVRk as a metaverse and introduces the Creation Engine.
Tier‑1 https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/creation-engine Creation Engine: creation of 3D assets and ownership via NFTs.
Tier‑1 https://docs.netvrk.co/contracts Addresses of the token, NFT contracts and staking are published (onchain artifacts).
Tier‑1 https://docs.netvrk.co/netvrk-whitepaper-3.0/the-economy/the-token The role of the NETVR token is described: in‑game transactions, NFT minting, staking.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the project has an AI component” was found.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/netvrk Reference token profile and links (context).
Tier‑2 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/netvrk/ Reference token profile and links (context).

No comments to display

Back to top