LayerAI
LayerAI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
LayerAI — “data economy” infrastructure for scenarios around AI models (intent), token: LAI (ERC‑20).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: an ecosystem around a “data economy” with a blockchain network and products (marketplace, applications), oriented toward data monetization in the context of AI models (per the project docs).
- Who it’s for: data users/providers, network participants, developers of ecosystem products.
- Why onchain/token: the onchain layer is used for transactions/network rules; the LAI token is described as a gas token and an asset for staking and utility in the ecosystem.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: uses the ecosystem’s products (marketplace/applications) and participates in the network data economy.
- The system does: records transactions and interactions in the network layer and the ecosystem’s products.
- The user gets: access to data/assets and utility within the ecosystem (per the project docs).
- Where the blockchain is: the network and the token contracts (onchain artifacts).
- Token role: LAI is described as gas for transactions, staking for validation, and utility (discounts/liquidity/related mechanics).
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | LayerAI |
| Also known as (aliases) | CryptoGPT, LayerAI, LAI |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/315_cryptogpt_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | LAI |
| Category | AI/Data | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | Ethereum |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoS (Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x168e209d7b2f58f1f24b8ae7b7d35e662bbf11cc |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (payments + staking) |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | gas token; staking for validation; utility (discounts/ecosystem mechanics) — per the docs |
| Governance | DAO |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | data monetization for AI models |
| Use‑case (use_case) | data economy (marketplace + app ecosystem) |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 2 / evidence_score 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://layerai.org/ |
| Docs | https://docs.layerai.org |
| GitHub | https://github.com/layerai |
| Releases / Changelog | https://www.layerai.org/news-opinions |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | https://layerai.org/milestones |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://etherscan.io/token/0x168e209d7b2f58f1f24b8ae7b7d35e662bbf11cc |
| X | https://twitter.com/LayerAIorg |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | http://t.me/LayerAI_org |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cryptogpt-token |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cryptogpt/ |
General project overview
In its documentation, LayerAI describes itself as an ecosystem and a blockchain network oriented toward data monetization in the context of AI models. The documentation also lists the ecosystem’s products (L2 network, marketplace, etc.).
Features/modules
- Network layer (Layer‑2 network, per the docs).
- Marketplace/ecosystem applications for interacting with the “data economy” (per the docs).
- LAI token: gas/staking/utility (per the docs).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user interacts with the ecosystem’s products (marketplace/applications) → performs actions/transactions within the network.
- Scenario 2: a network participant stakes/delegates LAI to participate in validation (as described in the token documentation).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet for EVM networks (for interacting with the ERC‑20 token and related onchain operations).
- Network/chain: Ethereum for the LAI token (per the Explorer link).
- Fees: network fees for onchain operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: the LAI token (ERC‑20) + the ecosystem’s products/website/docs; details of the network layer and the protocol’s contract addresses are not recorded per Tier‑1 in this card.
- Participant roles: product users, network participants/validators/delegators (as described in the documentation).
- Where logic runs: onchain — the token/accounting of operations; the rest of the product logic — as a service/applications (per the documentation).
- Dependencies: EVM infrastructure (wallets, RPC, explorers).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: in the documentation, LAI is described as the gas token for transactions.
- Staking/validation: the documentation describes staking (including delegation) for participation in network validation.
- Discounts/utility in products: the documentation mentions discounts for stakers and utility in the ecosystem.
Governance
- Governance format: a DAO layer/community governance is claimed; the specific procedure (venues, thresholds, votes) is not established per Tier‑1 in this card.
Security and incidents
- Audits: no Tier‑1 public audit reports were found.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: key risks — a lack of verifiable Tier‑1 artifacts on security/contracts and a “gap” between marketing claims and verifiable facts.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: the project’s documentation and website are active; the website contains links to products/dashboards.
- Key releases/milestones: —.
- Roadmap: — (see links_*).
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: the ecosystem’s products are listed in the documentation (L2 network, marketplace, etc.).
- Partners: —.
- Where it’s actually used: scenarios are described in the official documentation (see links_*).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? In the docs, AI is mentioned as the application context (data monetization “within AI models”). No Tier‑1 description of a specific AI component (model/metrics/architecture) was found.
- What is truly onchain? The token/contracts and the ecosystem’s network layer (per the docs).
- Why is a token needed? Gas for transactions and staking/validation; utility in the ecosystem’s products.
- Red flags (based on the information found): AI marketing without a tech description/metrics; the absence of public audit reports/addresses of key contracts in Tier‑1.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | medium | 2 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): LayerAI describes itself as a network/ecosystem for data monetization in the context of AI models (intent).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): This records the AI direction (intent) but does not prove a specific working AI component/model.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 description of a specific AI function/module performed by a model/agent was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no sufficiently specific description of “what exactly the AI does” as a verifiable function per Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 demonstration of the AI function itself (an example/guide where an AI result is visible) was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are products/dashboards, but they do not confirm a demo of a specific AI component.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): A reproducible set of quality metrics for the AI part was not found per Tier‑1.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI part (architecture/versions/model) was not found per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Without technical detail, AI_4 cannot be confirmed.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Ethereum
- Addresses/identifiers: LAI ERC‑20: 0x168e209d7b2f58f1f24b8ae7b7d35e662bbf11cc
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x168e209d7b2f58f1f24b8ae7b7d35e662bbf11cc
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is an onchain artifact with the token address.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established per Tier‑1 in this card (other than the token).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): OC_2 requires verifiable artifacts/addresses/descriptions of onchain logic beyond the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not proven per Tier‑1 that a key property of the product breaks down without onchain (in this card).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no sufficient Tier‑1 justification of “why the blockchain is critical”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token, LAI.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/economy/lai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token is described in the official documentation.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): LAI is described as the gas token for transactions/network operations.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/economy/lai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation explicitly states the “gas token” role.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): LAI is used for staking/network validation (lock/stake for validators; delegation is possible).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/economy/lai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Staking for network validation is described as part of the token’s utility.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A specific governance mechanism via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1 in this card.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are mentions of a DAO/community, but no clear procedure/rules tied to the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token with “simply paying in another currency” is not proven.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.layerai.org/economy/lai-token
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes the token’s role as gas and as part of staking/utility; a conclusion about replaceability requires separate justification.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.layerai.org/ | The project describes LayerAI as a network/ecosystem for data monetization in the context of AI models (intent). |
| Tier‑1 | https://docs.layerai.org/economy/lai-token | LAI: gas token; staking/validation and claimed utility in the ecosystem. |
| Tier‑1 | https://etherscan.io/token/0x168e209d7b2f58f1f24b8ae7b7d35e662bbf11cc | Onchain artifact: the ERC‑20 token contract (Ethereum). |
| Tier‑2 | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/cryptogpt-token | Reference token profile and links (context). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/cryptogpt/ | Reference token profile and links (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display