Skip to main content

WAM

WAM — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

WAM — an AI/Other | Gaming project with the WAM token (BEP‑20; BNB Smart Chain; multichain is also claimed).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a tournament‑based P2E platform (web/PWA + mobile apps) for mini‑games and competitions for digital assets.
  • Who it’s for: players and communities that participate in tournaments/challenges.
  • Why onchain/token: the project claims that it “uses blockchain to secure digital assets”; the WAM token is described as the ecosystem’s utility token (access/rewards/ownership of digital assets).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: enters the app and participates in tournaments.
  2. The system does: keeps track of progress/rewards and, per the project’s claim, uses blockchain components for digital assets.
  3. The user gets: results/status and digital assets, if they are provided for by the tournament mechanics.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the WAM token (including BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain) and the claimed digital assets.
  5. Token role: per the project website — access to the ecosystem, rewards to players and “decentralized owning” of digital assets.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name WAM
Also known as (aliases) WAM app; playWAM; WAM token
Logo (logo) ../assets/322_wam-app_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) WAM
Category AI/Other | Gaming
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) 2019-09
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xeBBAefF6217d22E7744394061D874015709b8141
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1 000 000 000 WAM
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Per the project website: the token is used for access to the ecosystem, rewards to players and for ownership of digital assets.
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit yes
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI modules for game content
Use‑case (use_case) tournaments + mini-games with digital assets
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

WAM describes itself as an “AI‑powered gaming” P2E platform: an app (web/PWA + iOS/Android) with tournament mechanics, where users participate in competitions and can receive digital assets. The project website also separately describes the WAM token as the utility token of a multichain ecosystem (BNB Chain / Cronos / MultiversX / Solana per the project’s claim).

Features/modules

  • Tournaments and mini‑games: a “competitive, tournament based” format (per the Token Details page).
  • Web/PWA and mobile apps: web (PWA), iOS and Android are claimed.
  • Digital assets (claimed): the website describes the use of blockchain to “secure your digital assets”.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: the user opens the app → participates in a tournament → receives a result/status.
  • Scenario 2: the user interacts with the WAM token ecosystem (for example, via DEX/bridge using the project’s links).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: web access to the app or installation of the mobile app; for onchain operations — an EVM wallet.
  • Network/chain: for onchain operations with BEP‑20 — BNB Smart Chain.
  • Fees: depend on the chosen network and onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: client apps + onchain layer (the token and related operations per the project’s links).
  • Where logic runs: game logic — offchain in the apps; onchain — the token/digital assets and the operations described by the project.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: per the website — access to the ecosystem, rewards to players and ownership of digital assets.
  • Supply: fixed, 1 000 000 000 WAM (per the website).

Security and incidents

  • Audits: a CertiK audit is listed on the Token Details page (link to Skynet).
  • Bug bounty: no Tier‑1 confirmation of a bug bounty program was found.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The project claims “AI‑powered gaming” and the use of AI “to enable new ways of creating fun content”, but no Tier‑1 technical description of the AI component (model/metrics/architecture) was found.
  • What is truly onchain? The WAM token (BEP‑20) and the claimed digital assets/ownership of them.
  • Why is a token needed? Per the website: access to the ecosystem, rewards to players, ownership of digital assets.
  • Red flags (what to double‑check):
    • The AI part is described in general wording; to raise the AI flags, Tier‑1 technical details/examples/metrics are needed.
    • No Tier‑1 found on bug bounty.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the project positions the product as “AI‑powered gaming”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 claim about an AI direction (intent), but without technical details.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI “enables new ways of creating fun content” (without specifics).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 does not contain a sufficient description of the AI component’s features to set 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no reproducible Tier‑1 example specifically of the AI component was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the app is available, but an “AI demo” as an artifact is not recorded.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no metrics of the AI component were found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): no tech description of an AI component was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 technical documentation of the AI part.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: WAM token contract 0xeBBAefF6217d22E7744394061D874015709b8141
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/investors
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the contract is listed on the official Token Details page.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: “blockchain technology to secure your digital assets” is claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 statement about the role of blockchain in digital assets, beyond the existence of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain criticality (what breaks without it) is not explicitly substantiated in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the WAM token exists.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/investors
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the contract is listed on the official Token Details page.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a direct “payment for the service with the token” is not recorded in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the available Tier‑1 sources the role of the token as payment rails is described in general terms (“facilitate access”).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token is used for rewards to players (“reward players”).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://wam.app/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the purpose of the token as a reward mechanism is claimed on the official website.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): governance mechanics via the token are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): governance is not described in the available Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token with a subscription/fiat is not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 statement about replaceability.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://wam.app/ Positioning as “AI‑powered gaming”, a description of the token’s role (access/rewards/ownership) and a mention of blockchain for digital assets.
Tier‑1 https://wam.app/investors Token Details: the contract on BNB, the TGE date (Dec 2021), the CertiK audit.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xebbaeff6217d22e7744394061d874015709b8141 Onchain fact: the WAM token (BEP‑20) on BNB Smart Chain.
Tier‑1 https://play.wam.app/ Access to the app (PWA/web).
Tier‑1 https://skynet.certik.com/projects/wam Audit/project page in CertiK Skynet (the link is given on the WAM website).

No comments to display

Back to top