OMAX
OMAX — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
OMAX — an L1 blockchain project (OMAX Blockchain) with the native token OMAX and components such as bridge/staking/governance (per the whitepaper).
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a blockchain network and a set of components (consensus/validators/bridge/staking/governance) described in the project’s whitepaper.
- Who it’s for: users and projects that need their own L1 network and the infrastructure around it (bridge/staking — per the whitepaper).
- Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for consensus and the network state; the OMAX token is described as a native coin linked to staking and governance.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: connects to the network/validators and uses the network’s functions (per the whitepaper).
- The system does: maintains the “Proof of Staked Authority” consensus and finality (per the whitepaper’s description).
- The user gets: transaction confirmation and state in the network.
- Where the blockchain is: consensus/validators/transaction accounting — onchain in the OMAX network.
- Token role: OMAX is mentioned in the context of staking and governance.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | OMAX |
| Also known as (aliases) | OMAX Coin; OMAX Blockchain |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/320_omax-token_logo.png |
| Token symbol (ticker) | OMAX |
| Category | Infra |
| Primary chain (chain) | OMAX Chain |
| Type | Appchain |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | PoSA (Proof of Staked Authority) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | native |
| Token contract | — |
| Token model (token_type) | utility (governance) |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | no inflation; validators receive network fees |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | Per the whitepaper: validator rewards come from transaction fees (no inflation); the token is used for staking/delegation and validator elections. |
| Governance | staking‑based governance (validator selection by stake; top‑21) |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | — |
| Use‑case (use_case) | L1 network + bridge/staking |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0) |
| DecAI Fit component summary | ai_score 0 / onchain_score 3 / token_score 3 / evidence_score 2 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://omaxcoin.com/ |
| Docs | https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf |
| GitHub | https://github.com/OMAXCHAIN |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://omaxray.com/ |
| X | https://twitter.com/omaxchain |
| Discord | https://discord.com/invite/omaxchain |
| Telegram | https://t.me/OmaxToken |
| Medium | — |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/omax-token |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/omax-token/ |
General project overview
In its whitepaper OMAX describes “OMAX Blockchain” as a separate blockchain network with Proof of Staked Authority consensus, a validator set/quorum, finality mechanisms and additional components such as OMAX Bridge, as well as sections on staking and governance.
Features/modules
- Consensus (per the whitepaper): Proof of Staked Authority, Validator quorum, security/finality.
- OMAX Bridge (per the whitepaper): sections on the bridge and event processing.
- Staking and Governance (per the whitepaper): separate sections on staking and governance.
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user sends transactions to the network → receives confirmation/finality (per the consensus description).
- Scenario 2: a participant uses the staking mechanics → interacts with governance/validators (per the whitepaper; parameter details require extraction).
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: a wallet/client compatible with the OMAX network (details — in the documentation/whitepaper).
- Network/chain: OMAX Chain.
- Fees: network fees (details — in the project documentation).
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components (per the whitepaper): the validator network/quorum, PoSA consensus, the bridge.
- Participant roles: validators and network users (in the whitepaper’s terms).
- Where logic runs: consensus/state accounting — onchain; bridge components partially depend on integrations with other networks.
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Network token: OMAX — the native coin.
- Transaction fees / rewards: per the whitepaper, validators receive rewards from transaction fees in OMAX; it is separately stated that the token is non‑inflationary (rewards are not via “issuance per block”).
- Staking: per the whitepaper, token holders “bond” tokens (delegate) to validators/candidates; validators can share part of the rewards with delegators.
Governance
- Governance: per the whitepaper, staking‑based governance is used to select/update the validator set (including top‑21 by stake; updated every 24 hours); slashing penalties for negative behavior/unavailability are also mentioned.
Security and incidents
- Audits: —.
- Bug bounty: —.
- Incidents: —.
- Threat model: risks of the validator quorum, bridges and dependence on external integrations.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: mainnet (based on the presence of a public explorer).
- Key milestones: —.
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Integrations: —.
- Where it’s actually used: the network state and blocks are available via the public OMAX explorer (see links_*).
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? In the project’s available Tier‑1 sources (whitepaper/official website) an AI component of the product is not identified.
- What is truly onchain? Consensus/validators/transaction accounting of the OMAX network; separate whitepaper sections describe the bridge/staking.
- Why is a token needed? Per the whitepaper, OMAX is used for fees/validator rewards and in staking‑based governance (delegation/validator selection).
- Red flags (based on the information found): —.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 0/6 — no AI reality and no AI intent (ai_score=0)
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | absent | 0 |
| Onchain necessity | high | 3 |
| Token necessity | high | 3 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 2 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): AI intent is not identified in the project’s Tier‑1 sources.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper is devoted to L1/bridge/consensus; AI intentions are not stated.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): An AI component of the product is not described.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper contains no description of an AI module.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): There is no demo of an AI part (an AI part is not claimed).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No claimed AI component.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: —
- Context (version/date/how measured): —
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics are not applicable (no AI component).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): A technical description of an AI component is not applicable (no AI component).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): No AI component.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: OMAX Chain
- Addresses/identifiers: public network explorer/statistics (omaxray.com)
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf ; https://omaxray.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes a separate network; the explorer provides verifiable access to the network state.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 1
- What useful logic is onchain: L1 consensus/validators/finality; bridge/staking/governance are described as parts of the blockchain infrastructure.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper describes network/consensus logic that is broader than “just a token”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 1
- “Replace the blockchain” test: without a blockchain/consensus, the claimed property of an L1 network (validators/finality/state) is impossible.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper is devoted to building a separate blockchain and to justifying a “separate blockchain”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The project has a token/coin, OMAX (whitepaper: “OMAX Coin”).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper directly refers to “OMAX COIN”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Validators receive rewards from transaction fees in OMAX; network fees are paid in OMAX (utility as gas/fees).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): The whitepaper explicitly states that validator rewards are formed from transaction fees in OMAX and that “mining rewards / inflation” is not used.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): Staking/delegation is used to form the validator set; the whitepaper mentions slashing penalties for negative behavior/unavailability.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the bonding/delegation logic and of slashing as a penalty mechanic.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): The whitepaper describes staking‑based governance: selection/rotation of validators by the number of “bonded” tokens (top‑21; recalculated every 24 hours).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 explicitly describes that token holders can delegate stake to validators/candidates and that the top‑staked become validators.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Insufficient data for a conclusion.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf | Description of OMAX Blockchain, Proof of Staked Authority consensus, the bridge and the sections on staking/governance. |
| Tier‑1 | https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf | Staking‑based governance: token bonding/delegation; the top‑21 staked nodes form the validator set; the selection is updated every 24 hours. |
| Tier‑1 | https://omaxcoin.com/Whitepaper/OMAX_Whitepaper.pdf | Reward/fees: validators receive transaction fees in OMAX; the whitepaper states that the token is non‑inflationary (no “mining rewards”). |
| Tier‑1 | https://omaxray.com/ | The public network explorer (verifiable network state). |
| Tier‑1 | https://omaxcoin.com/ | The project’s official website (entry point and navigation to the documents). |
| Tier‑1 | https://github.com/OMAXCHAIN | The official GitHub organization (source code/development artifacts, if applicable). |
No comments to display
No comments to display