YOUR AI

YOUR AI (YOURAI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

YOUR AI — an AI/Other | Infra project on Ethereum: described on the official protocol page as an AI‑driven protocol/platform for creating and distributing “product content” (product descriptions/product pages) and as a base for dApps; the YOURAI token — an ERC‑20 on Ethereum (Tier‑1: website + Etherscan).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

What it is: a platform/protocol for generating and distributing “product content” using AI (per the official protocol page).
Who it’s for: content creators and teams/dApps that want to build applications on top of the protocol and earn from streaming/distributing content.
What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the project’s web product (app.your.io, the “Log in” link on the Tier‑1 pages of the website).
Why onchain/token: the Tier‑1 text claims an “earn tokens” mechanism for contributors; the onchain part of the protocol (other than the token) is not confirmed by addresses/contracts in Tier‑1 sources.

How it works (very briefly)

The user does: creates/publishes product content or builds a dApp on the protocol.
The system does: the AI component generates/helps create content; the protocol distributes/streams content and accounts for participation.
The user gets: ready‑made “rich product pages” and/or income/rewards (per the claim on the protocol page).
Where the blockchain is: the confirmed Tier‑1 artifact is the YOURAI token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum; other contracts/addresses of the protocol are not singled out in Tier‑1 sources.
Token role (if any): rewards to participants/contributors of the protocol (per the website).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field	Value
Project name	YOUR AI
Also known as (aliases)	YOURAI; Your.io; YOUR protocol
Logo (logo)	—
Token symbol (ticker)	YOURAI
Category	AI/Other \| Infra
Primary chain (chain)	Ethereum
Type	EVM
Network status	mainnet
Consensus (consensus)	PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date)	—
Project status (status)	active
Token (standard)	ERC-20
Token contract	0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A
Token model (token_type)	—
Max supply	1,000,000,000 YOURAI
Issuance	fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief)	earn mechanic for contributors (Tier‑1: Protocol page); supply 1B (Etherscan)
Governance	—
Admins/keys	—
Audit	—
Bug bounty	—
Team (team)	—
Funding (investors/funding)	—
AI component (ai_component)	AI-driven product content generation
Use‑case (use_case)	rich product pages + content streaming
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit	2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary	2 / 1 / 1 / 0
Last verified	2026-02-11

Links (links_*)

Type	Link
Website	https://your.io/token
Docs	https://your.io/protocol
GitHub	https://github.com/your-network/YOURToken
Releases / Changelog	—
Whitepaper	—
Roadmap	—
Security advisories	—
Explorer	https://etherscan.io/token/0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A
App / Demo	https://app.your.io/signup
X	https://twitter.com/yourtokens
Discord	https://discord.com/invite/yourio
Telegram	https://t.me/your_community
Medium	https://yourprotocol.medium.com/
Audit report(s)	—
Bug bounty	—
CoinGecko (profile, reference)	https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/your-ai
CoinMarketCap (profile, reference)	https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/your/

General project overview

On the “Protocol” page, the project states that users can “instantly build rich product pages” and also “earn tokens as a protocol contributor”; it is also claimed that the open‑source protocol allows dApps to be built on top of the network, and content can be “search, request, distribute, and earn”. The wording points to AI‑driven content creation, but details of the model/metrics/architecture were not found in a single Tier‑1 document.

Features/modules

AI‑driven generation/creation of product content (claimed).
A token reward mechanic for content creators and dApps (claimed).
A public repository of the token (GitHub, Tier‑1 per Etherscan).

Typical scenarios

Scenario 1: a creator publishes product content → receives rewards (as claimed on the page).
Scenario 2: a developer builds a dApp → receives payouts depending on the “# of streams” (as claimed on the page).

Getting started (wallet/network)

What you need: access to the website/docs; for the token — an EVM wallet and ETH for gas.
Network/chain: Ethereum (the YOURAI token).
Fees: Ethereum gas for onchain operations.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

Components: web platform/protocol + an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum.
Where logic runs: the token is confirmed by Tier‑1; the architecture of the protocol and of the onchain contracts (other than the token) is not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

Claimed role of the token: “earn tokens” for contributors; a reward economy for content creators/dApps.
Supply: max total supply of 1B YOURAI on Etherscan.

Governance

Not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Security and incidents

Audits / bug bounty / advisories: no confirmation found in Tier‑1 sources.

AI component of the project

What is real AI here? In the Tier‑1 text, AI is claimed as “AI‑driven product content”, i.e. AI is used for generating/preparing content.
What is truly onchain? The YOURAI token on Ethereum; the rest of the onchain part of the protocol is not confirmed by addresses/contracts in Tier‑1 sources.
Why is a token needed? A role in rewards/the contributor economy is claimed.
Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — if there is no description of the model/metrics/versions; onchain‑washing — if the “decentralized network” is not backed by addresses/contracts; what to double‑check — which onchain contracts of the protocol actually exist and how they are linked to the token.

DecAI Fit component summary

DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis

Component	Level	Score
AI reality	low	2
Onchain necessity	low	1
Token necessity	low	1
Evidence	Tier‑1 present	0

Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

AI_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product (AI‑driven content), not just intent.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://your.io/protocol
Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 applies to intent without evidence; here there is a Tier‑1 description of the AI application.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

AI_1 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): AI is used to create/generate “product content” and “rich product pages”.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://your.io/protocol
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the wording on the protocol page directly describes the AI feature as content generation/creation.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

AI_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): the Tier‑1 pages of the website have a link to the project’s web product (app.your.io).
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://your.io/protocol ; https://app.your.io/signup
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 “what you can touch” artifact (a web product).
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

AI_3 (decision): 0
Metrics: —
Context (version/date/how measured): —
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics/benchmarks of the AI content are not published in Tier‑1 sources.
Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

AI_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): a tech description of the AI part (models/versions/architecture) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the protocol page contains no structured tech description of the AI architecture.
Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

OC_1 (decision): 1
Chain: Ethereum
Addresses/identifiers: token YOURAI: 0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is verified via Etherscan.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

OC_2 (decision): 0
What useful logic is onchain: not established.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 source with addresses/a description of the protocol’s onchain contracts was found.
Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

OC_3 (decision): 0
“Replace the blockchain” test: not proven per Tier‑1 sources.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification that a key property of the product breaks down without the blockchain.
Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

TK_0 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the project has a token, YOURAI, on Ethereum.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed by the explorer.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

TK_1 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): mandatory payment for a service with the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the protocol page contains no strict description of pay‑per‑use in YOURAI.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

TK_2 (decision): 1
Claim (one line): “earn tokens as a protocol contributor” and payouts to creators/dApps are claimed.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://your.io/protocol
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 text explicitly describes a token reward mechanic.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

TK_3 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): the governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 materials do not describe voting/governance via the token.
Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

TK_4 (decision): 0
Claim (one line): no conclusion about the replaceability of the token has been drawn.
Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 justification/“with token/without token” comparison.
Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier	Source	What it proves
Tier‑1	https://your.io/protocol	AI‑driven creation of product content; earn tokens for contributors; the role of dApps
Tier‑1	https://app.your.io/signup	The project’s web product (signup/onboarding) as “what you can touch”.
Tier‑1	https://etherscan.io/token/0xC5bA042BF8832999b17c9036E8212f49DCE0501A	token YOURAI: network, contract, max supply, links to GitHub/social media
Tier‑1	—	No Tier‑1 source for claim “there are onchain contracts of the protocol (other than the token) with addresses” was found.