Skip to main content

Mind AI

Mind AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Mind AI — an AI/Other / Infra project on BNB Smart Chain, token (symbol: MA).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a “Trading Insights” platform based on social intelligence and AI agents (per the official docs).
  • Who it’s for: for users who need web3 analytics and access to “premium insights”.
  • Why onchain/token: the MA token is described as an access key (tiers), a staking mechanic and future voting power (per the docs); the onchain part mostly boils down to the token.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): Launch App: https://app.mind-ai.io/

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses the platform’s analytics/insights (per the description in the docs).
  2. The system does: analyzes social/market signals and provides AI‑based summaries/tools (per the docs).
  3. The user gets: access to insights/features depending on the tier (hold/stake MA).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the MA token is BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain.
  5. Token role (if any): access to services (points/tiers), staking rewards and a claimed governance role in the future.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Mind AI
Also known as (aliases) MindAI
Logo (logo) ../assets/378_mind-ai_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) MA
Category AI/Other | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xb5Ab5cF2e2c686aE43F01F23859F3a55a8629C1C
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + staking + governance)
Max supply 500,000,000
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) tiers by hold/stake; vesting by rounds (per the docs)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agents for social intelligence
Use‑case (use_case) trading insights + analytics
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 2 / 1 / 3 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In the Mind AI documentation, the project describes itself as a “Trading Insights Platform Powered by Social Intelligence & Advanced AI Agents”. The functions of the MA token are also described: access to services via tiers (hold/stake), staking rewards, future voting power and other mechanics.

Features/modules

  • Access to analytics/insights based on social intelligence and AI agents (per the docs).
  • Tier access via hold/stake of MA (per the docs).
  • Staking rewards and claimed voting power in the future (per the docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user reads the docs → chooses the needed modules/insights → uses the product as offchain analytics.
  • Scenario 2: a user uses/stakes MA → gets tier access to premium features.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a browser; for operations with the token — a wallet on BNB Smart Chain.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain.
  • Fees: BSC fees arise for onchain operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an offchain platform/analytics + the MA token (BEP‑20) for access/tiers.
  • Participant roles: users/holders/stakers of the token; the team/service operator.
  • Where logic runs: analytics and the AI part — offchain; onchain — holding/staking of the token.
  • Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain (token) + the offchain infrastructure of the service.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: access to analytics/premium features via tiers + a points model (per the docs).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: token‑gating (tiers) and staking mechanics (per the docs).
  • Who pays fees: users for onchain operations (transfers/staking).
  • Where fees go: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Issuance/burn: the docs describe the idea of burning after reaching API milestones (conditionally).
  • Incentive mechanisms: staking rewards, reward models (per the docs).
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: the docs have a tokenomics table (rounds and vesting).
  • Treasury: “Treasury & Staking” is allocated in the tokenomics; management details are not disclosed.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: — (no Tier‑1 confirmation of incidents found).
  • Threat model: risks of centralized offchain analytics + token/contract risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active; the BEP‑20 token exists on BSC.
  • Key milestones: — (not structured per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Roadmap: see links_* (docs).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: an offchain platform + the MA token (BSC) as an access mechanism.
  • Partners: — (no Tier‑1 found).
  • Where it’s actually used: described in the official docs.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The docs claim “AI agents” and “social intelligence” as the basis of the product (detailed quality metrics were not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • What is truly onchain? Onchain is confirmed by the presence of the MA token (BEP‑20) on BSC; the rest of the logic looks like an offchain platform.
  • Why is a token needed? Per the docs, the token is needed for tier access/points, staking rewards and (in the future) voting power.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): there is no Tier‑1 demo/example confirming AI output; the onchain part may come down to the token.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product (not just intent).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes a product with AI agents.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents are used for social intelligence and analytics/insights (per the docs).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 explicitly states the positioning and purpose of the AI agents.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The official website has a Launch App (app.mind-ai.io).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.mind-ai.io/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a public entry point into the product (Launch App) that can be verified.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quantitative quality metrics of the AI part were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI architecture/versions was not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is general documentation of the product and the token, but without an engineering specification of the AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xb5Ab5cF2e2c686aE43F01F23859F3a55a8629C1C
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xb5ab5cf2e2c686ae43f01f23859f3a55a8629c1c ; https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract and the chain are confirmed in the Tier‑1 docs and the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No confirmation of useful onchain logic of the product (other than the token/access) was found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: onchain criticality for the product is not proven per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token is used for access/tiers, but the product as analytics can be implemented without a blockchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, MA (BEP‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/tokenomics ; https://bscscan.com/token/0xb5ab5cf2e2c686ae43f01f23859f3a55a8629c1c
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract and supply are listed in the Tier‑1 docs.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The token is used as an access key to analytics and premium features (tier system).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly states that MA is the key to access and tiers.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The docs describe staking rewards/apy and reward mechanics.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 lists staking rewards and reward systems.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The docs state that stakers receive voting power “in future Mind AI decisions”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is an explicit governance role, albeit marked “future”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the token as an access key/points, but does not compare it with alternatives.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.mind-ai.io/ Product positioning: “Trading Insights Platform … AI Agents”.
Tier‑1 https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/token-utility Token utility: access/tiers, staking rewards, future voting power.
Tier‑1 https://docs.mind-ai.io/economy/tokenomics Tokenomics: total supply 500M, contract address, chain.
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xb5ab5cf2e2c686ae43f01f23859f3a55a8629c1c Onchain fact of the MA token contract.
Tier‑1 https://www.mind-ai.io/ Launch App (public entry point into the product).
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/mind-ai Token context/metadata (aggregator).

No comments to display

Back to top