Skip to main content

Clustr

Clustr (CLUSTR) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Clustr (in the documentation also: Clustr Labs, Clustr Network) — an AI/Agents | Infra project on Base: an ecosystem around “autonomous AI agents” and the economic mechanisms associated with them; the CLUSTR token — an ERC‑20 on Base (per the official documentation and BaseScan).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: in the Tier‑1 documentation, the project describes work in the field of “Autonomous AI” (CEA/ASI) and the “Clustr Network” ecosystem.
  • Who it’s for: developers and ecosystem participants who build/use agentic applications and the economic mechanics around them.
  • Why onchain/token: the token is positioned as the “internal currency” of the ecosystem for transactions and incentives for agent activity.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: studies the documentation and gets oriented in the project’s components/theses.
  2. The system does: describes the Clustr Network ecosystem and the role of the CLUSTR token as the economic layer.
  3. The user gets: an understanding of “what is claimed” and which artifacts can be verified (token/links/repositories).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the confirmed Tier‑1 artifact is the ERC‑20 contract of the CLUSTR token on the Base network.
  5. Token role (if any): the token is claimed as a means of settlement and incentives within the ecosystem.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Clustr
Also known as (aliases) Clustr Network; Clustr Labs; CLUSTR
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) CLUSTR
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Base
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Base on Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x4b361e60cf256b926ba15f157d69cac9cd037426
Token model (token_type) utility (payments)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 CLUSTR
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) “backbone currency” of the ecosystem; burn + liquidity locking are claimed
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) autonomous AI agents (CEA); swarm intelligence
Use‑case (use_case) agent ecosystem + token economy
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 1 / 1 / 2 / 0
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In the official documentation, the project describes itself as a development lab that advances open‑source developments in the field of “Autonomous Artificial Intelligence”, with an emphasis on Cognitive Economic Agents (CEA) and Artificial Swarm Intelligence (ASI), and links this to the “Clustr Network” ecosystem built around the CLUSTR token.

Features/modules

  • Public “thesis” documentation and a description of the ecosystem.
  • CLUSTR tokenomics as the economic layer (currency + incentives).
  • A public GitHub repository (see links_*).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a developer reads the docs → assesses the thesis and the claimed “agentic” focus → decides whether the project is relevant.
  • Scenario 2: a participant studies the tokenomics → understands the claimed role of CLUSTR and the deflationary mechanics (if they are implemented).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: for reading — the website/docs; for onchain operations — an EVM wallet that supports Base.
  • Network/chain: Base (the CLUSTR token).
  • Fees: Base network fees when interacting with the token/contracts.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: documentation, GitHub, an ERC‑20 token on the Base network.
  • Where logic runs: the token contract is confirmed by Tier‑1; the protocol‑level onchain logic of the ecosystem (other than the token) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: the token is described as a “backbone currency” that “facilitates transactions” and “incentivizes agent activity”.
  • Issuance/deflation: the tokenomics claims deflationary mechanics; BaseScan shows a max total supply of 1B CLUSTR.
  • Incentive mechanisms: the Tier‑1 text contains the “agent activity” incentive, but without formal parameters in one place.

Governance

Not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Security and incidents

  • Audits / bug bounty / advisories: no confirmation found in Tier‑1 sources.

Project status and timeline

  • Roadmap: published in the documentation (see links_*).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? In the Tier‑1 documentation, the project explicitly claims a focus on autonomous AI agents (CEA) and swarm intelligence as a direction, but does not single out a verifiable AI component of the “product/protocol” with a clear description of features/versions/metrics.
  • What is truly onchain? The CLUSTR token as an ERC‑20 on the Base network.
  • Why is a token needed? In the Tier‑1 documentation, the token is described as a “currency” for transactions and incentives for agent activity.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing — AI remains at the level of a thesis without specific artifacts/metrics; onchain‑washing — if there is no verifiable onchain logic other than the token; what to double‑check — the existence of onchain contracts/addresses other than the token and their role.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 0
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the project claims work in the field of “Autonomous AI” with a focus on CEA and swarm intelligence.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a Tier‑1 statement of direction (intent), but without a verifiable description of a specific AI module/metrics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the specific function of the AI component of the product/protocol (what it does and where it runs) is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 artifact that describes the operation of the AI component at the product/protocol level.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): a demo/app/quickstart that can be reproduced as “what you can touch” was not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 link to an app/demo/quickstart with a reproducible scenario.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): metrics/benchmarks of the AI component were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the tech description/architecture of the AI part specifically (models/versions/pipelines) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 document with the architecture/versions of the AI part was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Base
  • Addresses/identifiers: token CLUSTR: 0x4b361e60cf256b926ba15f157d69cac9cd037426
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x4b361e60cf256b926ba15f157d69cac9cd037426
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token and the network is verifiable via the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: not established.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no Tier‑1 source with addresses/a description of the ecosystem’s onchain logic other than the token was found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: not proven; the available Tier‑1 sources do not show that a key property of the product breaks down without the blockchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no verifiable justification of the “criticality” of onchain at the protocol level.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, CLUSTR (ERC‑20 on Base).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://basescan.org/token/0x4b361e60cf256b926ba15f157d69cac9cd037426
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token and its parameters are available in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): CLUSTR is claimed as a “backbone currency” that facilitates transactions in the ecosystem.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/readme/introducing-usdclustr
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 text explicitly states “facilitating transactions”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): the token is claimed as a tool for incentivizing agent activity.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/readme/introducing-usdclustr
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 text explicitly states “incentivizing agent activity”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): onchain governance via the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 description of governance mechanics tied to the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the replaceability of the token (for example with a stablecoin/subscription) is not justified in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no explicit Tier‑1 “with token vs without token” comparison.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/ focus on “Autonomous AI”, CEA/ASI; description of the Clustr Network ecosystem
Tier‑1 https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/readme/introducing-usdclustr role of the token: “currency”, transactions and incentives for agent activity
Tier‑1 https://clustr.gitbook.io/clustr-labs/tokenomics tokenomics: CLUSTR as the economic backbone of the ecosystem
Tier‑1 https://basescan.org/token/0x4b361e60cf256b926ba15f157d69cac9cd037426 onchain fact of the CLUSTR token (symbol, max supply, Base network, contract)
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the protocol has onchain logic other than the token” was found.
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “what exactly the AI component of the product/protocol does” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top