Skip to main content

RODAI

RODAI (ROD AI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

RODAI (ROD AI) — a meme token on the Solana network that is positioned as an “AI meme token”; token (symbol: RODAI).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a meme token tied to the Aerosol brand/team (per the official website).
  • Who it’s for: holders/members of the token community.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain — issuance and circulation of the token on Solana; the protocol necessity of the token for AI features is not confirmed by Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with the RODAI token on Solana.
  2. The system does: onchain records token ownership/transfers.
  3. The user gets: participation in the meme community; additional “utilities” mostly relate to Aerosol products (per the website).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the SPL token and its parameters/supply in the Solana explorer.
  5. Token role (if any): in the description the token is a meme asset; specific AI utility is not confirmed by Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name RODAI
Also known as (aliases) ROD AI
Logo (logo) —
Token symbol (ticker) RODAI
Category AI/Other | Meme
Primary chain (chain) Solana
Type non-EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Solana)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024-01-13
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) SPL
Token contract GdbyLsNKHKLXTZVEo8QrGKVmrexEeZUYvhpSfuZ9TdkC
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 69.42T
Issuance fixed
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) fixed supply; no mint authority; liquidity locked (per the website)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI meme token (positioning)
Use‑case (use_case) meme community token
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

The official RODAI website describes the token as “The First AI Meme Token on Solana” and the “official deflationary meme token of Aerosol”. The website provides basic information about the contract, supply, distribution and “liquidity locked”.

No Tier‑1 confirmation of a working AI component (model/agent/service) was found, and no demo/example was found that can be verified as an AI feature of RODAI itself.

Features/modules

  • SPL token on Solana.
  • Declaration of a “deflationary meme token” and tokenomics parameters on the website.
  • Links to Aerosol products (for example Burn & Claim), but this is not proof of an AI component of RODAI.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user interacts with the RODAI token → participates in the meme community.
  • Scenario 2: a user checks the contract/supply and transactions in Solscan → assesses the onchain facts of the token.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a Solana wallet (for example Phantom/Solflare) for operations with the token.
  • Network/chain: Solana.
  • Fees: Solana fees for swaps/transfers of the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: SPL token on Solana + the official website/community channels.
  • Participant roles: token holders/community; the team/operator.
  • Where logic runs: onchain — the token; the rest — offchain (website/social media).
  • Dependencies: Solana infrastructure (token) + the website’s offchain infrastructure.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established as a “protocol utility” (service/access/compute) per Tier‑1; the token is described as a meme token.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: —.
  • Who pays fees: users pay Solana fees for onchain operations with the token.
  • Where fees go: —.
  • Issuance/burn: fixed/capped supply; the website states the absence of a mint authority.
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: the website states “Liquidity Locked” (30+ years) and “No Mint Authority”.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: the website provides the distribution (Liquidity/DAO/Team/Airdrops) without detailed vesting.
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not found in Tier‑1).
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: — (no Tier‑1 found).
  • Threat model: token/liquidity/contract risks; there is no evidence of an AI component.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active; the SPL token exists on Solana.
  • Key releases/milestones: launch 2024-01-13 (per the website).
  • Roadmap: available on the official website (see links_*).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (no Tier‑1 confirmations found).
  • Partners: Aerosol (mentioned on the website).
  • Where it’s actually used: — (other than token circulation).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Tier‑1 (the website) has the “AI meme token” positioning, but no evidence of a working AI component of the product was found.
  • What is truly onchain? Onchain is confirmed by the existence of the SPL token and its parameters/history in the Solana explorer.
  • Why is a token needed? The token is the main product; a specific “necessity of the token” for a service/protocol (payment for compute/access, etc.) is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI positioning without technical proof; possible mixing of Aerosol utilities with the utility of the token itself.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 2/6 — low alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 partial 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): On the website the token is positioned as an “AI Meme Token”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.rodai.meme
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This is intent/positioning without evidence of an AI module (AI_1..AI_4 remain 0).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A specific description of the product’s AI features was not found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There are only general “AI meme token” claims.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A demo/guide confirming an AI component of RODAI was not found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website contains token info and links for purchase/community, but no verifiable AI output.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI metrics were not found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI architecture/versions was not found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no engineering documentation on AI.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Solana
  • Addresses/identifiers: GdbyLsNKHKLXTZVEo8QrGKVmrexEeZUYvhpSfuZ9TdkC
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/GdbyLsNKHKLXTZVEo8QrGKVmrexEeZUYvhpSfuZ9TdkC
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The onchain fact of the token is confirmed in Solscan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No confirmation of onchain logic other than the token was found in Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the criticality of onchain is not confirmed; the product is a token/community.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of “breaks down without the blockchain” for functionality other than token issuance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has an SPL token, RODAI.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://solscan.io/token/GdbyLsNKHKLXTZVEo8QrGKVmrexEeZUYvhpSfuZ9TdkC ; https://www.rodai.meme
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The contract and token details are present in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Payment for services with the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The website has no description of a payment utility of the token for a service.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Protocol‑level staking/slashing/rewards are not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No incentive/collateral mechanics were found in Tier‑1, other than the claimed “deflationary” characteristic.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no description of DAO voting/governance with the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The protocol necessity of the token for the product/service is not established; the token looks replaceable in the sense of “no function in the protocol”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.rodai.meme
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 does not describe a mandatory role of the token for the operation of a service, other than a “meme asset”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.rodai.meme The “First AI Meme Token” positioning, token details, max supply, distribution, “no mint authority”.
Tier‑1 https://solscan.io/token/GdbyLsNKHKLXTZVEo8QrGKVmrexEeZUYvhpSfuZ9TdkC Onchain fact of the SPL token on Solana.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/rod-ai Token context/metadata (aggregator).
Tier‑1 — No Tier‑1 source for claim “the product has a working AI component” was found.

No comments to display

Back to top