Skip to main content

AGIX

AGIX (formerly AIgentX) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AGIX (formerly AIgentX) — an AI/Agents / Infra project on Ethereum, token (symbol: AGX).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: the project describes a “decentralized marketplace for blockchain AI agents” and a web application/ecosystem of AI agents (per the docs).
  • Who it’s for: for users who need AI agents for web3 tasks, and for developers/contributors of the ecosystem.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is confirmed by the ERC‑20 token AGX; the docs claim staking and revenue sharing for the token.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the web application app.agint.xyz (“Launch App” on the official website).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: opens the web app/marketplace and chooses an AI agent/scenario (per the description in the docs).
  2. The system does: provides AI agents/applications and an interface for web3 interactions (per the docs).
  3. The user gets: an AI assistant/tool for tasks in Web3 (per the docs).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AGX token exists on Ethereum (and the website also mentions a Base address).
  5. Token role (if any): the docs claim staking and revenue sharing (current utility) + expansion plans.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AGIX
Also known as (aliases) AIgentX, AGIX
Logo (logo) ../assets/377_aigentx_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AGX
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) 2024
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xE2432110C32D0717E33c245fe0CFA2B26c07f47a
Token model (token_type) utility (staking + rewards)
Max supply 100,000,000
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) staking + revenue sharing (per the docs)
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) decentralized AI agents marketplace
Use‑case (use_case) AI agents for Web3 interactions
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 3 / 1 / 1 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

In the GitBook documentation, the project describes itself as AGIX (formerly AIgentX), which is building a “decentralized marketplace for blockchain AI agents” and lists a set of “AI agents and applications” (community management agent, personal trading agent, support agent, webapp, browser extension).

The official website also shows “Launch App” and a link to the whitepaper. The onchain part is confirmed by the AGX token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.

Features/modules

  • A marketplace/ecosystem of AI agents for web3 tasks (per the docs).
  • WebApp and browser extension (per the docs).
  • The AGX token as the utility token of the ecosystem (staking + revenue sharing — per the docs).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user opens the web app → interacts with AI agents/tools (per the website/docs).
  • Scenario 2: a token holder stakes AGX → participates in the claimed staking/revenue sharing mechanics (per the docs).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: open “Launch App”; for operations with the token — an Ethereum wallet.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for onchain operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: offchain applications/agents + the AGX token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.
  • Participant roles: users; AI agent developers/contributors; the platform operator.
  • Where logic runs: AI logic and applications — offchain; onchain — the token.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum (token) + the offchain infrastructure of the web app.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: docs: AGX “facilitates staking and revenue sharing” and is claimed to be the cornerstone of the ecosystem.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: a token‑incentives model (per the docs/whitepaper).
  • Who pays fees: users pay Ethereum fees for onchain operations.
  • Where fees go: — (not extracted from Tier‑1 sources).
  • Issuance/burn: max total supply 100,000,000 (per Etherscan).
  • Incentive mechanisms: staking + revenue sharing (per the docs).
  • Distribution/vesting: — (not extracted from Tier‑1 sources).
  • Treasury: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • How protocol parameters change: —.
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: —.
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: — (no Tier‑1 confirmation of incidents found).
  • Threat model: risks of offchain agents + token/contract risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active; the ERC‑20 token exists on Ethereum; there is a web app (Tier‑1).
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: published on the website (in general items by year).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: web app, Discord/Telegram, browser extensions (per the docs).
  • Partners: — (not found per Tier‑1 sources).
  • Where it’s actually used: described in the GitBook documentation.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? The docs describe a marketplace of AI agents and specific agent types (community management, trading, support, etc.).
  • What is truly onchain? Onchain is confirmed by the ERC‑20 token AGX (Ethereum).
  • Why is a token needed? The docs claim staking and revenue sharing; the whitepaper describes the incentive model and tokenomics.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): quality/accuracy metrics of the AI agents were not found in Tier‑1 sources; the onchain part may come down to the token.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality high 3
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product/ecosystem (a marketplace of AI agents), not just intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aigentx.xyz/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a Tier‑1 description of the solutions/agents and the ecosystem.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents for web3 tasks and a marketplace of AI agents are described (per the docs).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aigentx.xyz/ ; https://docs.aigentx.xyz/agix-ecosystem/decentralized-marketplace-of-ai-agents
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 lists the agent types and their purpose.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The official website contains “Launch App” and a link to the web app.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://agint.xyz/ ; http://app.agint.xyz/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a verifiable URL of the web application (what you can touch).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Quality metrics of the AI agents were not found in Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There is a whitepaper PDF and GitBook documentation of the ecosystem/agents.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://app.agint.xyz/agix-whitepaper.pdf ; https://docs.aigentx.xyz/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 documents describe the architecture/terms and tokenomics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0xE2432110C32D0717E33c245fe0CFA2B26c07f47a
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xE2432110C32D0717E33c245fe0CFA2B26c07f47a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token contract is confirmed in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: —
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No confirmation of onchain logic of the product (other than the token) was found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: onchain criticality is not proven per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The documentation describes offchain agents/applications; onchain, the token is confirmed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, AGX (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aigentx.xyz/ ; https://etherscan.io/token/0xE2432110C32D0717E33c245fe0CFA2B26c07f47a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token is listed in the Tier‑1 docs and confirmed in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Payment for services/fees with the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The docs explicitly highlight staking and revenue sharing; a payment role is not recorded as mandatory.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The docs state that AGX “facilitates staking and revenue sharing”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.aigentx.xyz/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes staking and revenue sharing.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Governance via the token is not confirmed per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Governance is not described in the Tier‑1 pages found.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Evidence: —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes the token as a cornerstone with incentives, but without a comparison with alternatives.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.aigentx.xyz/ Introduction: decentralized marketplace for blockchain AI agents + the role of the token (staking/revenue sharing).
Tier‑1 https://agint.xyz/ Official website: “Launch App”, links to the whitepaper and the token contract.
Tier‑1 http://app.agint.xyz/ Web application (what you can touch).
Tier‑1 https://app.agint.xyz/agix-whitepaper.pdf Whitepaper: description of the multi‑agent framework and tokenomics.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xE2432110C32D0717E33c245fe0CFA2B26c07f47a Onchain fact of the AGX contract + max total supply.
Tier‑2 https://www.coingecko.com/en/coins/aigentx Token context/metadata (aggregator).

No comments to display

Back to top