Skip to main content

AutoCrypto

AutoCrypto — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

AutoCrypto — an AI/Other | DeFi project on the BNB Smart Chain network, token (symbol: AU).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project that positions “AI power” for automating decisions/tools in the crypto ecosystem (BSC).
  • Who it’s for: users who need automated tools and services around BNB Smart Chain.
  • Why onchain/token: the confirmed onchain artifact is the AU token on BNB Smart Chain; per Tier‑1 sources, the token is mentioned as a requirement/access to services, but the mandatory nature of the token as a protocol mechanism is not confirmed by Tier‑1.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the AutoCrypto AI web app (login/disclaimer) — https://autocrypto.ai/app

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: uses the AutoCrypto interface/tools and/or uses the AU token.
  2. The system does: applies AI approaches (per the description on the website) to deliver decisions/signals/automations.
  3. The user gets: the result of the tools’ operation (details — on the Tier‑1 website/in the whitepaper).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the token and transactions — onchain on BNB Smart Chain.
  5. Token role (if any): AU (BEP‑20); a Tier‑1 description of “token necessity” as a critical protocol mechanism was not found.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name AutoCrypto
Also known as (aliases) AU
Logo (logo) ../assets/737_autocrypto_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AU
Category AI/Other | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x8Ea2f890CB86DFb0E376137451c6fD982AFefc15
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply —
Issuance —
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI module for automated decisions
Use‑case (use_case) tools/services around BNB Smart Chain
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 2
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

On the Tier‑1 website, AutoCrypto describes the “Smart Investor” product as an automated service where decisions are made by AI, and also lists additional tools for BNB Smart Chain (for example, honeypot checking and protection). Within this card, we record verifiable elements: the Tier‑1 website/whitepaper and the existence of the AU token on BNB Smart Chain.

Features/modules

  • Smart Investor (per the website description): decision automation using AI.
  • A set of tools for BNB Smart Chain (for example, checking/protection; per the website description).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user connects a wallet and uses the project tools → receives the result of the service’s operation (details — per the project documentation).
  • Scenario 2: a user interacts with the AU token → transactions are observable in the BSC explorer.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: a wallet for BNB Smart Chain and access to the website/interfaces.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain.
  • Fees: BNB Smart Chain network fees for transactions.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the AU token (BEP‑20) + AutoCrypto offchain interfaces/services (details are not confirmed by Tier‑1 sources).
  • Participant roles: service users and token holders.
  • Where logic runs: the token — onchain; AI/services — offchain, details are not established.
  • Dependencies: —.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: per the Tier‑1 website, the token is mentioned as a requirement for access to tiers/services; the formal “protocol necessity” of the token is not established.
  • Who pays fees: the user (BSC network fee).
  • Issuance/burn: —.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: —.
  • How protocol parameters change: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: —.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: typical smart contract risks and offchain service risks (details not established).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: mainnet (the token on BNB Smart Chain).
  • Key releases/milestones: —.
  • Roadmap: —.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? the Tier‑1 website claims that the service’s decisions are made by AI; “predictor engines” are described.
  • What is truly onchain? the verifiable onchain artifact is the AU token (BEP‑20) on BNB Smart Chain.
  • Why is a token needed? per the Tier‑1 website, the token is linked to access to services; the mandatory nature of the token as a protocol mechanism is not established.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): absence of public quality metrics for the AI modules; dependence on offchain services; mixing marketing wording and Tier‑1 evidence.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 2
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is claimed as an operational part of the product (not just a “plan/intent”).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): This item about “intentions” does not add a signal when AI is already claimed as part of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 website describes AI modules (predictor engines) for decision automation in crypto scenarios.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a description of the purpose; there are no metrics/architecture for AI_3/AI_4.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There is an AutoCrypto AI web app (product surface).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/app
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of a public web surface is sufficient for a demo surface.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): No quantitative quality metrics for the AI modules were found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The tech description/architecture of the AI part were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto-web-assets.s3.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/autocrypto-whitepaper-en.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires architectural details/versions; these were not found per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: token contract 0x8Ea2f890CB86DFb0E376137451c6fD982AFefc15
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x8Ea2f890CB86DFb0E376137451c6fD982AFefc15
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of the token and an observable contract in the explorer confirms an onchain artifact.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: No Tier‑1 confirmation of onchain logic of the product, other than the token, was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires addresses/a description of protocol/logic contracts, not just the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: per Tier‑1 sources, it is not established that a key property of the product breaks down without onchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is no Tier‑1 justification of onchain criticality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, AU (BEP‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x8Ea2f890CB86DFb0E376137451c6fD982AFefc15 ; https://autocrypto.ai
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The token is observable in the explorer and listed on the official website.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The whitepaper describes entry into tiers by buying/holding AU (tier access).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/assets/AutoCrypto%20-%20Whitepaper%20EN.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes AU as a way to enter/access the platform’s functionality.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Mechanisms of incentives/collateral/penalties with the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Specific rules/contracts/documentation are needed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No Tier‑1 confirmation of the governance role of the token was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): 1 requires an explicit governance process/documentation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 describes an alternative for entry into tiers via a one‑time FIAT payment (i.e. without AU).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://autocrypto.ai/assets/AutoCrypto%20-%20Whitepaper%20EN.pdf
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The existence of a Tier‑1 alternative for entry without the token is direct grounds for “replaceable”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://autocrypto.ai/ AI positioning of the project and a description of the modules/tools.
Tier‑1 https://autocrypto.ai/assets/AutoCrypto%20-%20Whitepaper%20EN.pdf Tier access to the platform via AU and the alternative via a one‑time FIAT payment.
Tier‑1 https://autocrypto.ai/app The existence of a web app (product surface).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x8Ea2f890CB86DFb0E376137451c6fD982AFefc15 The existence of the AU token on BNB Smart Chain (contract/network).
Tier‑3 https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/autocrypto/ Token profile on an aggregator (context; not proof).

No comments to display

Back to top