Skip to main content

Quadency (Quad Terminal)

Quadency (Quad Terminal) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Quadency (Quad Terminal) — an AI/Other | DeFi project (trading automation + AI assistant) on the Ethereum network, token (symbol: QUAD).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a platform for crypto trading, portfolio analytics and automation (bots/strategies), with a claimed AI assistant, Cody.
  • Who it’s for: traders and users who want to manage trades/bots and a portfolio from a single interface.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is used for issuance/circulation of the QUAD token; it is not established per Tier‑1 that the product requires onchain logic other than the token.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the Quad Terminal web terminal and signup/account area (see links_*).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: connects exchanges/accounts (in the platform’s terms) and chooses trading tools/bot strategies.
  2. The system does: provides a terminal/analytics interface and runs automations (bots) according to the specified parameters.
  3. The user gets: trading and automation management in one place.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the QUAD token — ERC‑20 on the Ethereum network.
  5. Token role (if any): per Tier‑1, the token is used as a means of payment/obtaining a discount on subscriptions when paying in QUAD; other token roles require separate verification.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Quadency (Quad Terminal)
Also known as (aliases) Quad Terminal, QUAD
Logo (logo) ../assets/742_quadency_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) QUAD
Category AI/Other | DeFi
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xAB2A7B5876D707e0126B3A75EF7781c77c8877EE
Token model (token_type) utility (payments)
Max supply 397,739,862 QUAD
Issuance fixed (max total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) A discount on paid plans is claimed when paying in QUAD (discount for QUAD holders / pay with QUAD).
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI assistant Cody for trading/strategies
Use‑case (use_case) trading terminal + bots/automation
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Quadency (Quad Terminal) describes itself as a platform for managing crypto trading and automations (bots/strategies) focused on a “single interface” for working with multiple exchanges, and also with an additional AI assistant (Cody) for interaction through chat commands and help with strategies.

Per Tier‑1 sources, the following are confirmed: the existence of the product (web terminal/platform pages), the existence of the QUAD token (ERC‑20) and the claimed role of QUAD as a means of payment/obtaining a discount on subscriptions when paying in QUAD. Confirmation of the necessity of onchain “as a critical component” for the operation of the product (OC_3) was not found per Tier‑1 sources.

Features/modules

  • Trading terminal: a single interface for trading and order management (positioned as a multi‑exchange terminal).
  • Automations/bots: a set of ready‑made strategies and a strategy builder.
  • Cody AI: an AI assistant for trading/strategies (claimed in the whitepaper and on the website).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user connects exchanges/accounts → manages trades and a portfolio from a single interface.
  • Scenario 2: a user selects/configures a bot → launches trading strategy automation.
  • Scenario 3: a user uses Cody AI → formulates commands/strategy ideas in text (as claimed in Tier‑1 sources).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an account in Quad Terminal (and, if necessary, connection of exchanges/accounts within the platform).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum — only for interaction with the QUAD token (as an ERC‑20).
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees for operations with QUAD; platform fees/terms — in the official documentation.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the web platform (terminal/bots/analytics); the QUAD token on Ethereum.
  • Participant roles: platform users; QUAD holders.
  • Where logic runs: product logic of the terminal/bots — offchain (in terms of onchain verifiability, this is not confirmed as onchain); the token — onchain on Ethereum.
  • Dependencies: centralized exchanges/integrations (as claimed by the platform), and the Ethereum network for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: per Tier‑1, a discount on paid plans is claimed when paying in QUAD.
  • Product necessity drivers: it is not established per Tier‑1 that the product “breaks down” without the token; the role of the token appears optional (discounts/payment).
  • Issuance/supply: Max Total Supply on Etherscan: 397,739,862 QUAD.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: typical risks of centralized integrations/accounts and risks of the ERC‑20 token (phishing, approvals).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the availability of the public website/documentation).
  • Roadmap: not found per Tier‑1.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: a multi‑exchange terminal (claimed in Tier‑1 sources); integration details require separate verification.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? per Tier‑1, an AI assistant, Cody, is claimed to help with trading commands/strategies (chat interface).
  • What is truly onchain? the QUAD token as an ERC‑20 on the Ethereum network.
  • Why is a token needed? per Tier‑1, utility is claimed: a discount on subscriptions when paying in QUAD.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): the absence of a Tier‑1 tech description of the Cody model/architecture (AI_4=0) and quality metrics (AI_3=0); per the available data, the onchain part appears to be a token without critical onchain logic (OC_2=0, OC_3=0).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The AI component is described as an existing feature (Cody AI), not just as “intent/roadmap”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/ ; https://quadterminal.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 adds no signal when Tier‑1 already describes an AI feature of the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): An AI assistant, Cody, is claimed for trading/strategies (chat commands; strategy generation/conversion).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/product-features/cody-ai-trading-assistant ; https://quadterminal.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 sources directly describe the purpose of the AI assistant.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There is a public web entry/signup into Quad Terminal (product surface).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://quadterminal.com/a/signup ; https://quadterminal.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of a public entry/web interface is sufficient for a “demo surface”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): no reproducible set of quality metrics for the AI component was found in the available Tier‑1 materials.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): No tech description of the Cody AI model/architecture/versions was found in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without architecture/versions/model design, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: QUAD token: 0xAB2A7B5876D707e0126B3A75EF7781c77c8877EE
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xAB2A7B5876D707e0126B3A75EF7781c77c8877EE
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token and its parameters is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: it is not established per Tier‑1 that there is useful logic onchain other than the token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without explicit onchain modules/addresses/a description of the logic, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: no claims/artifacts were found in Tier‑1 that without the blockchain the product breaks down.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a justification of “replacing the blockchain”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, QUAD (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xAB2A7B5876D707e0126B3A75EF7781c77c8877EE
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): It is claimed that paying for a subscription with the QUAD token gives a discount on paid plans.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://quadterminal.com/ (section “Discounts for QUAD holders … when paying with QUAD”)
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): The Tier‑1 website directly describes payment/discounts via QUAD.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties in the protocol via QUAD are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of the incentive mechanics, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit description of the governance mechanics, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token (for example, with payment without the token) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://whitepaper.quadency.com/ ; https://quadterminal.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit comparison “the same is possible without the token”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://whitepaper.quadency.com/ Official description of the Quadency/Quad Terminal platform and its feature set (automation, terminal, Cody assistant).
Tier‑1 https://whitepaper.quadency.com/product-features/cody-ai-trading-assistant A claim about Cody as an AI trading assistant (chat commands/simplification of strategy execution).
Tier‑1 https://quadterminal.com/ A description of the platform’s features and a claim about a discount when paying for a subscription in QUAD.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xAB2A7B5876D707e0126B3A75EF7781c77c8877EE Onchain fact of the QUAD token (ERC‑20), symbol and Max Total Supply.
Tier‑1 https://quadterminal.com/a/signup The existence of a public product surface (signup/access to the web terminal).

No comments to display

Back to top