Skip to main content

Aventis (Aventis AI)

Aventis (Aventis AI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Aventis (Aventis AI) — an AI/Other | Consumer project (AI‑driven learning + verifiable credentials, claimed), token (symbol: AAI) on the BNB Smart Chain network.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an educational platform that claims AI‑driven learning and the issuance/verification of “blockchain‑secured credentials”, as well as “metaverse accessibility” (per the whitepaper).
  • Who it’s for: global learners/users who value learning and verifiable credentials (as claimed in the whitepaper).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is claimed as a layer for verifiable credentials/certificates; the AAI token exists onchain (BNB Smart Chain) and is described as a utility token of the ecosystem (governance + access to AI/Metaverse/RWA utility).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://agents.aventisai.io/ (AI Agents), https://ai.aventislearning.com/ (Agentic AI Training Coach).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: takes training on the platform (as claimed).
  2. The system does: uses AI modules for learning and records/issues credentials that are claimed to be “blockchain‑secured”.
  3. The user gets: an educational outcome and credentials/confirmations (claimed).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AAI token (BNB Smart Chain) and (as claimed) a credentials/certificates layer on the blockchain.
  5. Token role (if any): Tier‑1 describes a utility layer of the token (governance vote + access to ecosystem services/utility).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Aventis (Aventis AI)
Also known as (aliases) Aventis AI, AAI
Logo (logo) ../assets/746_aventis-metaverse_logo.png
Token symbol (ticker) AAI
Category AI/Other | Consumer
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0xED19B2B301E8a4e18c5DCa374a27e7d209Ba02c9
Token model (token_type) utility (governance + access + utility)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 AAI
Issuance fixed (total supply; no future inflation)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) In Tier‑1 tokenomics: total supply 1B AAI, distribution across funds (community/ecosystem/team/reserves/liquidity) and vesting.
Governance governance vote (as claimed)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) Samuel Teo (co‑founder), Shaun Sung (Chief Web3 Officer), Carmen Yap (Head of Ecosystem), Rina Lim (COO)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI agents / AI-driven learning
Use‑case (use_case) AI training + verifiable credentials
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 2 / token_score 1 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the Tier‑1 whitepaper, Aventis is a platform positioned around three “pillars”: AI‑Powered, Authenticity (RWA) and Accessibility (Metaverse), with particular emphasis on “AI‑driven learning” and “blockchain‑secured credentials”.

In the onchain part, the existence of the Aventis AI (AAI) token on the BNB Smart Chain network is confirmed per Tier‑1. Tier‑1 utilities also describes the issuance/verification of blockchain‑verified certificates, but the addresses of specific contracts/data format for the credentials layer are not recorded in this card, so OC_3 remains 0.

Features/modules

  • AI‑driven learning (claimed): learning with AI modules.
  • Blockchain‑secured credentials (claimed): credentials/credentials are recorded and verified via the blockchain.
  • Metaverse accessibility (claimed): an accessibility/content delivery layer via “metaverse” channels.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user takes training → receives an outcome/credential (claimed).
  • Scenario 2: a third party verifies a credential → confirmation via a blockchain trail (claimed, details require verification).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an account/access to the platform (see links_*).
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain — for the AAI token.
  • Fees: BNB Smart Chain fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: an offchain learning platform + the onchain AAI token; the credential layer is claimed to be blockchain‑verified.
  • Participant roles: learners/content providers/credential verifiers (as claimed).
  • Where logic runs: learning — offchain; the token/part of credential proofs — onchain (address/format details are not established).
  • Dependencies: BNB Smart Chain infrastructure for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: Tier‑1 utilities describes governance vote and access to AI/Metaverse/RWA utility (including blockchain‑verified certificates).
  • Issuance/supply: in Tier‑1 tokenomics — total supply 1,000,000,000 AAI (without future inflation).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: typical risks of the ERC‑20 token and risks of trusting offchain learning without public AI validation artifacts.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the presence of the whitepaper and onchain token).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? per the Tier‑1 whitepaper, “AI‑driven learning” is claimed.
  • What is truly onchain? the AAI token on BNB Smart Chain; Tier‑1 utilities describes blockchain‑verified certificates and a governance/utility layer.
  • Why is a token needed? in Tier‑1 utilities, the token is described as the cornerstone of the ecosystem: governance vote + access to services/utility.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): absence of a tech description/versions/metrics of AI modules in the available Tier‑1 materials; absence of addresses/artifacts of the credential layer for strict onchain verification.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 4/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity low 1
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product (AI‑driven learning), not only as intent.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 is not required when a description of an AI feature exists.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI‑driven learning in the educational platform is claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper explicitly formulates AI‑driven learning as a component.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There are public product surfaces (AI Agents/Coach) on the project’s domains.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.aventisai.io/ ; https://agents.aventisai.io/ ; https://ai.aventislearning.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of a public product/demo surface is sufficient for AI_2=1; quality metrics (AI_3) are not confirmed separately.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description/architecture/versions specifically of AI modules are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a tech description, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: the AAI token: 0xED19B2B301E8a4e18c5DCa374a27e7d209Ba02c9
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xED19B2B301E8a4e18c5DCa374a27e7d209Ba02c9
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by BscScan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: blockchain‑verified certificates / verifiable credentials (described in utilities as part of the ecosystem).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp/aai/utilities ; https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): utilities describes the issuance of blockchain‑verified certificates and related utility; contract addresses are not given.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: per Tier‑1, there is no strict justification that without the blockchain the product breaks down (in terms of the SSOT test).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a formulation of the “replace the blockchain” test, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, AAI (BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0xED19B2B301E8a4e18c5DCa374a27e7d209Ba02c9
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The payment role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): utilities describes access/utility and governance, but does not record a “pay token for service” format.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of protocol incentive mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): Utilities describes governance vote (voting) as utility of the AAI token.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp/aai/utilities
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 utilities explicitly describes governance vote as a use of the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit comparison “the same is possible without the token”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp Tier‑1 description of Aventis: AI‑driven learning + verifiable credentials + metaverse accessibility (overview).
Tier‑1 https://www.aventisai.io/ Public product description and links to surfaces (AI Agents/Coach), as well as the team composition.
Tier‑1 https://agents.aventisai.io/ Public product surface (AI agents) — demo surface (AI_2).
Tier‑1 https://ai.aventislearning.com/ Public product surface (Agentic AI Training Coach) — demo surface (AI_2).
Tier‑1 https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp/aai/utilities AAI token utility: governance vote + access to AI/Metaverse/RWA utility + blockchain‑verified certificates (claimed).
Tier‑1 https://aventis.gitbook.io/wp/aai/tokenomics Tokenomics: total supply 1B AAI (no future inflation) + distribution and vesting (claimed).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xED19B2B301E8a4e18c5DCa374a27e7d209Ba02c9 Onchain fact of the Aventis AI (AAI) token on BNB Smart Chain and Max Total Supply 1,000,000,000.

No comments to display

Back to top