Skip to main content

MetaMonkeyAI (MMAI)

MetaMonkeyAI (MMAI) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

MetaMonkeyAI (MMAI) — an AI/Other | Metaverse project (metaverse + wallet; “AI technology” is claimed), token (symbol: MMAI) on the Ethereum network.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project that describes “PureWorld” (metaverse/game modes) and “PureWallet” (mobile wallet), and also claims integration of “real‑world AI technology”.
  • Who it’s for: metaverse/game users and wallet users (per the website description).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain records the MMAI token (ERC‑20); the existence of critical onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: interacts with the project’s products (PureWorld/PureWallet) and holds/transfers the MMAI token.
  2. The system does: provides applications/services (per the project’s claim on the website).
  3. The user gets: access to product features (the details and the role of the token require separate verification per Tier‑1).
  4. Where the blockchain is: the MMAI token — ERC‑20 on the Ethereum network.
  5. Token role (if any): it is not established per Tier‑1 sources that the token is mandatory for the operation of the product (payment/access/incentives).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name MetaMonkeyAI (MMAI)
Also known as (aliases) MMAI PureWorld, MMAI PureWallet
Logo (logo) ../assets/744_metamonkeyai_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) MMAI
Category AI/Other | Metaverse
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) —
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 10,000,000,000 MMAI
Issuance fixed (max total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI tech for metaverse
Use‑case (use_case) metaverse/games + mobile wallet
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per Tier‑1 sources, MetaMonkeyAI (MMAI) describes a product line around “PureWorld” (metaverse/game modes) and “PureWallet” (mobile crypto wallet), and also claims the existence/integration of AI technologies.

However, no Tier‑1 proof was found that AI is a verifiable component of the protocol (with a tech description/metrics). In the onchain part, the MMAI token (ERC‑20, Ethereum) is confirmed; other onchain logic, other than the token, is not established per Tier‑1.

Features/modules

  • PureWorld (claimed): metaverse/game modes.
  • PureWallet (claimed): mobile wallet (mentions include “cold wallet in your device”).
  • AI (intent): integration of “real‑world AI technology” into metaverse scenarios is claimed.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a user holds/transfers MMAI → ownership is recorded onchain on Ethereum.
  • Scenario 2: a user uses the PureWorld/PureWallet products → details of the functionality require separate verification per Tier‑1.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an EVM wallet for the MMAI token; for product applications — see the project website.
  • Network/chain: Ethereum (for ERC‑20 MMAI).
  • Fees: Ethereum network fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the MMAI ERC‑20 token contract; offchain applications/services (PureWorld/PureWallet) per the website description.
  • Participant roles: application users; token holders.
  • Where logic runs: token operations — onchain; the product logic of applications — offchain.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1.
  • Issuance/supply: Max Total Supply on Etherscan: 10,000,000,000 MMAI.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Bug bounty: not found per Tier‑1.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of centralized applications + typical ERC‑20 risks (phishing/approvals).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: not established per Tier‑1.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? per Tier‑1, there are claims about AI technologies and their integration into the metaverse, but without a verifiable tech description/metrics.
  • What is truly onchain? the MMAI token as ERC‑20 on the Ethereum network.
  • Why is a token needed? the role of the token in the product is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): “AI” as positioning without a tech description/metrics/demo; the onchain part looks like a token without confirmed protocol logic.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 website claims integration of “AI technology” into the product/metaverse.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://mmaipure.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a statement of intent, but without proof of a working AI component at the product/protocol level.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): What exactly the AI component does in the product (in terms of features/boundaries) is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://mmaipure.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there are general claims, but no specific verifiable description of AI features.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Demos/examples specifically of AI features were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://mmaipure.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website shows product pages, but without an explicit demo surface of the AI module.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description/architecture/versions of the AI component were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a tech description, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: the MMAI token: 0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: the existence of onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): only the token is confirmed in this card.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: No Tier‑1 justification of OC_3 was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a strict test, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, MMAI.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The use of the token as a mandatory payment for the service is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://mmaipure.com/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website does not record a “pay‑per‑service” mechanism for the token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties in the protocol via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of incentives/slashing.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of governance, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit comparison “the same is possible without the token”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://mmaipure.com/ Official description of PureWorld/PureWallet and a claim about the integration of AI technologies (intent).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0xaa0c5B3567fd1BAC8a2a11EB16c3F81a49eea90F Onchain fact of the MetamonkeyAi (MMAI) token and Max Total Supply 10,000,000,000 MMAI.

No comments to display

Back to top