Skip to main content

ALLIN (All In Society)

ALLIN (All In Society) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

ALLIN (All In Society) — an AI/Agents | Infra project (AI bot/AI tools and services for communities; claimed), token (symbol: AllIn) on the Ethereum network.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a project that claims a set of AI tools/services and “ALLIN One AI bot” for communities (AI chat assistant etc.).
  • Who it’s for: crypto communities and projects that need an AI bot/AI services for answers and automation (per the website description).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain records the All In (AllIn) token as ERC‑20 on Ethereum; the existence of critical onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the project’s web resources (for example, ALLIN Terminal) — see links_*.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: connects/uses the AI bot and the project’s services (as a managed service, per the website’s claim).
  2. The system does: answers natural language queries and provides tools/services (claimed).
  3. The user gets: automated answers/tools for the community.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the AllIn token — ERC‑20 on the Ethereum network.
  5. Token role (if any): the necessity of the token for the operation of AI services is not established per Tier‑1.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name ALLIN (All In Society)
Also known as (aliases) All In, AllIn, ALLIN One AI bot
Logo (logo) ../assets/747_all-in_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AllIn
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract 0x9B2b931d6AB97B6A887b2C5d8529537E6FE73Ebe
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 1,000,000 AllIn
Issuance fixed (max total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) AI chat assistant for communities
Use‑case (use_case) AI bot/tools for communities
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 2 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per the Tier‑1 website, ALLIN is positioned as an “AI‑powered initiative supported by blockchain”, offering AI tools/services and a separate “ALLIN One AI bot” (AI chat group assistant etc.). In this card, we conservatively record what is confirmed by the website description, without conclusions about the quality of AI models (there are no metrics).

In the onchain part, the All In (AllIn) token is confirmed as ERC‑20 on Ethereum. Confirmation that the product requires onchain logic other than the token was not found per Tier‑1 sources.

Features/modules

  • ALLIN One AI bot (claimed): an AI bot for answering user queries in a community.
  • AI platform (claimed): a web‑app for configuration/integrations.
  • Services (claimed): generative AI tools, custom AI solutions.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a project/community connects an AI bot → receives automated answers to questions.
  • Scenario 2: an admin configures data/integrations → the bot answers based on the knowledge base/settings (claimed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: web access to the project’s resources (for example, ALLIN Terminal).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum — for the AllIn token.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: offchain services/web resources + the AllIn ERC‑20 token.
  • Participant roles: bot/service users; token holders.
  • Where logic runs: AI logic — offchain; the token — onchain.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Issuance/supply: Max Total Supply on Etherscan: 1,000,000 AllIn.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Bug bounty: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: risks of offchain bots/integrations and typical ERC‑20 risks (phishing/approvals).

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the presence of the website/resources and onchain token).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: — (requires separate verification).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? per the Tier‑1 website, an AI bot and AI tools/services are claimed (chat assistant, data configuration).
  • What is truly onchain? the AllIn token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? the role of the token in the product is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): absence of a tech description/quality metrics of AI models; the onchain part looks like a token without confirmed protocol logic.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality medium 2
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is described as part of the product (AI bot/AI platform), not only as “intent”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://allin.so/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): when a description of an AI feature exists, AI_0 is not required.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): An AI chat assistant/bot for answering questions about the project/data and services is claimed.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://allin.so/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes “ALLIN One AI bot” and an AI chat assistant as a service.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): There is a public web resource, ALLIN Terminal, as a product surface.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://allin.so/ ; https://terminal.allin.so/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of a public web resource is sufficient for a demo surface.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): quality metrics of AI models were not found per Tier‑1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description/architecture/versions of the AI component are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a tech description, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: the AllIn token: 0x9B2b931d6AB97B6A887b2C5d8529537E6FE73Ebe
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x9B2b931d6AB97B6A887b2C5d8529537E6FE73Ebe
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by Etherscan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: the existence of useful onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://allin.so/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes offchain services; onchain artifacts other than the token are not provided.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: No Tier‑1 justification of OC_3 was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a strict test, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, AllIn (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x9B2b931d6AB97B6A887b2C5d8529537E6FE73Ebe
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The payment role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://allin.so/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website does not record mandatory “payment for the service with the token”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via the token are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of protocol incentive mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of governance, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit comparison “the same is possible without the token”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://allin.so/ Tier‑1 description of the AI initiative/services and “ALLIN One AI bot”.
Tier‑1 https://terminal.allin.so/ The existence of a public product surface (ALLIN Terminal).
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x9B2b931d6AB97B6A887b2C5d8529537E6FE73Ebe Onchain fact of the All In (AllIn) token and Max Total Supply 1,000,000.

No comments to display

Back to top