Skip to main content

Acria (Acria Network)

Acria (Acria Network) — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Acria (Acria Network) — an AI/Data | Infra project (data marketplace for AI training; claimed), token (symbol: ACRIA) on the Ethereum network.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a website/platform positioned as a marketplace for buying/selling “AI training data” (per the Tier‑1 website/whitepaper page).
  • Who it’s for: researchers/developers/data providers who need datasets for ML/AI.
  • Why onchain/token: the ACRIA token is confirmed as an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum; the role of the token in the operation of the marketplace is not established per Tier‑1 sources.

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: selects/buys datasets (per the marketplace description).
  2. The system does: provides a catalog/search and data purchase transactions (in the website’s terms).
  3. The user gets: access to datasets/data.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the ACRIA token — ERC‑20 on Ethereum.
  5. Token role (if any): it is not established per Tier‑1 sources that ACRIA is mandatory for purchase/access.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Acria (Acria Network)
Also known as (aliases) Acria.AI, AIMARKET, Acria AI Market
Logo (logo) ../assets/749_acria_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) ACRIA
Category AI/Data | Infra
Primary chain (chain) Ethereum
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoS (Ethereum)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) ERC-20
Token contract ACRIA: 0x44f5909e97e1cbf5fbbdf0fc92fd83cde5d5c58a (Ethereum); AIMARKET: 0xcb191ac518e7dee0f6e34c6b59ffbef47580e092 (BNB Smart Chain)
Token model (token_type) —
Max supply 100,130,000,000 ACRIA
Issuance fixed (max total supply)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) —
Governance —
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) dataset marketplace for AI training
Use‑case (use_case) dataset trading (buy/sell)
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary ai_score 1 / onchain_score 1 / token_score 0 / evidence_score 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Per Tier‑1 materials, Acria is positioned as an “AI training data” marketplace, that is, a venue for buying/selling datasets and data that can be used to train AI/ML models. In this card, we record this as AI intent/use case (AI/Data), but not as a confirmed “AI component of the protocol” (there is no tech description of the models).

In the onchain part, the Acria Token (ACRIA) token is confirmed as an ERC‑20 token on Ethereum. The role of ACRIA as a mandatory token for payment/access to the marketplace is not established per Tier‑1 sources.

Features/modules

  • Marketplace (claimed): a dataset catalog and a storefront for data sellers/providers.
  • Data purchase/sale (claimed): a transaction interface.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1: a buyer selects a dataset → gets access to the data (claimed).
  • Scenario 2: a data provider publishes a dataset → sells access (claimed).

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: access to the marketplace (see links_* Website/Docs).
  • Network/chain: Ethereum — for the ACRIA token.
  • Fees: Ethereum fees for operations with the token.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: a web marketplace (offchain) + the ACRIA ERC‑20 token.
  • Participant roles: data buyers/sellers; token holders.
  • Where logic runs: the marketplace — offchain; the token — onchain.
  • Dependencies: Ethereum infrastructure for the token.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: it is not established per Tier‑1 sources that buying data specifically requires ACRIA.
  • Issuance/supply: Max Total Supply on Etherscan: 100,130,000,000 ACRIA.
  • AIMARKET marketplace token: per the official ecosystem page, ACRIA is the main token (“As the main token, ACRIA…”) and AIMARKET is the marketplace token (“AIMARKET, our marketplace token”). AIMARKET is a BEP‑20 token on BNB Smart Chain, contract 0xcb191ac518e7dee0f6e34c6b59ffbef47580e092, onchain name “Acria AI Market”, symbol AIMARKET, total supply 1,000,000,000,000 AIMARKET. The CoinMarketCap profile acria-ai-aimarket was later renamed to an unrelated object, “AIC (Artificial Intelligence Coin)”, and is not used as a source for Acria.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: not established per Tier‑1.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Bug bounty: not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: offchain marketplace risks and ERC‑20 token risks.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (based on the presence of a public website/marketplace pages and an onchain token).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: —.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? the project is AI‑relevant as a data marketplace for AI training (AI/Data), but Tier‑1 evidence of a “working AI component” (model/architecture/metrics) is not established.
  • What is truly onchain? the ACRIA token (ERC‑20) on Ethereum.
  • Why is a token needed? the role of the token in the marketplace is not established per Tier‑1 sources.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): AI‑washing: “AI” as positioning without a tech description/metrics; token‑washing: the token exists, but the necessity of the token for the product is not confirmed.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality low 1
Onchain necessity low 1
Token necessity low 0
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The Tier‑1 website/whitepaper page describes Acria as an “AI training data” marketplace.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://acria.ai/ ; https://acria.network/whitepaper
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is AI intent/use case (data for AI), but not proof of an AI module.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): It is not established per Tier‑1 that the project includes a working AI module (model/inference); the focus is on data.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://acria.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes a data marketplace, not an AI model/inference.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A demo of an “AI component” is not established per Tier‑1 (data ≠ a model demo).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): a marketplace is not a demonstration of an AI model.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI quality metrics are absent per Tier‑1 (an AI module is not established).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A tech description of the AI module/versions was not found per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without AI architecture we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: Ethereum
  • Addresses/identifiers: the ACRIA token: 0x44f5909e97e1cbf5fbbdf0fc92fd83cde5d5c58a
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x44f5909e97e1cbf5fbbdf0fc92fd83cde5d5c58a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the onchain fact of the token is confirmed by Etherscan.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 0
  • What useful logic is onchain: the existence of onchain logic other than the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://acria.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website describes the marketplace as a web product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: No Tier‑1 justification of OC_3 was found.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a strict test, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The project has a token, ACRIA (ERC‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://etherscan.io/token/0x44f5909e97e1cbf5fbbdf0fc92fd83cde5d5c58a
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token is confirmed onchain.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Payment for the marketplace with the ACRIA token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://acria.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the website does not record ACRIA as a mandatory currency for buying data.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Incentives/collateral/penalties via ACRIA are not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no description of incentive mechanics.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): A governance role of ACRIA is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of governance, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): The replaceability of the token is not established per Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): without an explicit comparison “the same is possible without the token”, we set 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://acria.ai/ Tier‑1 description of a marketplace for “AI training data” (positioning/use case).
Tier‑1 https://acria.network/whitepaper An additional Tier‑1 page where the marketplace is described as an AI training data marketplace.
Tier‑1 https://etherscan.io/token/0x44f5909e97e1cbf5fbbdf0fc92fd83cde5d5c58a Onchain fact of the Acria Token (ACRIA) token and Max Total Supply 100,130,000,000.
Tier‑1 https://ecosystem.acria.ai/ The official ecosystem page: ACRIA is the main token (“As the main token, ACRIA…”), AIMARKET is the marketplace token (“AIMARKET, our marketplace token”) (checked 2026-09-25).
Tier‑1 https://token.acria.ai/ The official AIMARKET token page: the BNB Smart Chain network (“AIMARKET is currently listed on Pancakeswap on the BNB Smart Chain”) (checked 2026-09-25).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0xcb191ac518e7dee0f6e34c6b59ffbef47580e092 Onchain fact of the AIMARKET token (BEP‑20, BNB Smart Chain): name “Acria AI Market”, symbol AIMARKET, total supply 1,000,000,000,000 (checked 2026-09-25).

No comments to display

Back to top