Black Rabbit AI
Black Rabbit AI — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).
Black Rabbit AI — a project with a claimed AI tool for working with text/prompts; a token on the Arbitrum One network.
Disclaimer
Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.
TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)
- What it is: a service/tool positioned as “AI made simple” for creating text content.
- Who it’s for: users who need such a tool.
- Why onchain/token: onchain — token circulation and a verifiable contract address; the necessity of the token for key functions requires Tier‑1 confirmation.
How it works (very briefly)
- The user does: selects a content type/prompts in the service interface.
- The system does: forms requests to AI tools (as claimed on the website).
- The user gets: a text result.
- Where the blockchain is: the ERC‑20 token on the Arbitrum One network.
- Token role (if any): fee discount mechanics and a link between platform fees and the token are claimed; strict protocol necessity requires re‑checking.
Quick links: AI thesis fit
Project passport
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project name | Black Rabbit AI |
| Also known as (aliases) | BRAIN |
| Logo (logo) | ../assets/753_black-rabbit-ai_logo.svg |
| Token symbol (ticker) | BRAIN |
| Category | AI/Other | Consumer |
| Primary chain (chain) | Arbitrum One |
| Type | EVM |
| Network status | mainnet |
| Consensus (consensus) | L2 (Optimistic Rollup, Arbitrum One on Ethereum) |
| Launch date (launch_date) | — |
| Project status (status) | active |
| Token (standard) | ERC-20 |
| Token contract | 0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f |
| Token model (token_type) | — |
| Max supply | — |
| Issuance | — |
| Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) | platform discounts/fees (as claimed) |
| Governance | — |
| Admins/keys | — |
| Audit | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| Team (team) | — |
| Funding (investors/funding) | — |
| AI component (ai_component) | prompts/text AI |
| Use‑case (use_case) | text/content generation |
| DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit | 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis |
| DecAI Fit component summary | 1 / 1 / 0 / 3 |
| Last verified | 2026-02-11 |
Links (links_*)
| Type | Link |
|---|---|
| Website | https://blackrabbitai.com |
| Docs | — |
| GitHub | — |
| Releases / Changelog | — |
| Whitepaper | — |
| Roadmap | — |
| Security advisories | — |
| Explorer | https://arbiscan.io/token/0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f |
| X | https://twitter.com/BlackRabbitAI |
| Discord | — |
| Telegram | https://t.me/BlackRabbitAIPortal |
| Medium | https://blackrabbitai.medium.com |
| Audit report(s) | — |
| Bug bounty | — |
| CoinGecko (profile, reference) | — |
| CoinMarketCap (profile, reference) | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/black-rabbit-ai/ |
General project overview
Per Tier‑1 sources, the project describes an AI tool for creating written content and mentions the token as part of economic mechanics (discounts/fees). No confirmation of metrics/versions/architecture of the AI component and protocol necessity of the onchain part, other than the token, was found.
Features/modules
- An interface with prompt selection/optimization for text generation (as claimed).
Typical scenarios
- Scenario 1: a user selects a template/prompt and gets a text result.
Getting started (wallet/network)
- What you need: an account/access to the service; an EVM wallet to interact with the token.
- Network/chain: Arbitrum One.
- Fees: network fees for onchain operations.
Architecture/tech (non‑AI)
- Components: an ERC‑20 token on Arbitrum One + an offchain service (details not established).
Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)
- Token utility: discounts on platform fees for token ownership are claimed.
- Necessity of the token: strict necessity for key functions is not established per Tier‑1.
Governance
- Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Security and incidents
- Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
Project status and timeline
- Current status: active (based on the availability of official channels/pages).
- Roadmap: —.
Ecosystem/integrations
- Not established per Tier‑1 sources.
AI component of the project
- What is real AI here? The AI part is claimed in Tier‑1 sources, but no confirmation of metrics/versions/architecture was found.
- What is truly onchain? The ERC‑20 token and its contract on Arbitrum One.
- Why is a token needed? Discounts/fees are claimed; the protocol necessity of the token is not established.
- Red flags (based on the information found): no Tier‑1 metrics/architecture; no repository/releases; the onchain part appears limited to the token.
DecAI Fit component summary
- DecAI Fit: 3/6 — medium alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
| Component | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| AI reality | low | 1 |
| Onchain necessity | low | 1 |
| Token necessity | low | 0 |
| Evidence | Tier‑1 present | 3 |
Details
AI reality
AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)
- AI_0 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): an AI tool for text content is claimed on the official website.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://blackrabbitai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): this confirms intent, but does not prove a specific AI component and its quality.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)
- AI_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no sufficient Tier‑1 description of the model/algorithm and the applicability boundaries of the AI part was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://blackrabbitai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a clear description of the AI part we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)
- AI_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): a public demo/examples of the AI tool in operation are not established.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://blackrabbitai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the absence of a verifiable demo, we set 0 (conservatively).
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)
- AI_3 (decision): 0
- Metrics: not found.
- Context (version/date/how measured): not found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without numerical metrics and context we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)
- AI_4 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no tech description of the AI component with versions/architecture was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a tech description, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Onchain necessity
OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)
- OC_1 (decision): 1
- Chain: Arbitrum One
- Addresses/identifiers: 0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token contract address and the network are verifiable via the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)
- OC_2 (decision): 0
- What useful logic is onchain: not established (other than the token).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is no Tier‑1 confirmation of onchain logic beyond the token.
- Conflict note (if any): —
OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)
- OC_3 (decision): 0
- “Replace the blockchain” test: it is not established that the product breaks down without the blockchain.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a justification of onchain criticality, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Token necessity
TK_0 — no token (1/0)
- TK_0 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): the project has a token, BRAIN (ERC‑20).
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://arbiscan.io/token/0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): the existence of the token is verifiable via the explorer.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)
TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)
- TK_1 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of mandatory payment for the service with the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://blackrabbitai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): in the absence of an explicit mechanism for payment with the token we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)
- TK_2 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 description of incentives/collateral/penalties at the protocol level was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without incentive/collateral mechanics we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_3 — governance (1/0)
- TK_3 (decision): 0
- Claim (one line): no Tier‑1 confirmation of governance via the token was found.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — —
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): without a description of governance, we set 0.
- Conflict note (if any): —
TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)
- TK_4 (decision): 1
- Claim (one line): per the Tier‑1 description, the token is used for discounts/privileges and is potentially replaceable.
- Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://blackrabbitai.com/
- Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 does not provide a strict justification of “why it is impossible without the token”, so we set “replaceable”.
- Conflict note (if any): —
Evidence (table)
| Tier | Source | What it proves |
|---|---|---|
| Tier‑1 | https://blackrabbitai.com/ | Official project positioning; intent regarding an AI tool; claims about the role of the token/fees. |
| Tier‑1 | https://arbiscan.io/token/0x847Db21ef9DE627c23d3DfF470af6599b1A30d3f | The network and token contract address (onchain fact). |
| Tier‑2 | https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/black-rabbit-ai/ | Reference token profile (context). |
No comments to display
No comments to display