Skip to main content

Infinity Ground

Infinity Ground — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

Infinity Ground — an AI/Agents | Infra “agentic IDE” platform: application generation from natural language + claimed onchain creation/ownership; token (symbol: AIN) on BNB Chain (BEP‑20).

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: an “agent‑driven IDE” where the user describes an idea in natural language, and the system generates and helps deploy applications/assets (including web3 scenarios).
  • Who it’s for: developers and “vibe coders”, as well as users without programming skills who want to quickly build applications/mini‑games/content.
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is claimed for ownership/accounting of the created assets and for the “execution layer”; the AIN token is claimed as the ecosystem’s payment token (services/features/fees), as well as for membership/NFT, launchpad, governance and staking.
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): the public Infinity IDE and the remix/app‑creation pages (see links_* → App / Demo).

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: describes an idea for an application/game/contract in natural language and starts generation in the IDE.
  2. The system does: analyzes the intent, plans the workflow and in parallel generates/checks/refines the code using models (GPT‑4/Claude are mentioned in the docs) and a feedback loop.
  3. The user gets: a ready application/template, the ability to remix and deploy; a showcase of user‑generated applications.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the whitepaper claims execution/data/hosting layers and “onchain creation” for asset ownership; the AIN token is deployed on BNB Chain.
  5. Token role (if any): AIN is used as the ecosystem’s payment token, for access to features/the marketplace/launchpad, governance and staking.

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name Infinity Ground
Also known as (aliases) Infinity IDE; Agentic IDE; $AIN
Logo (logo) ../assets/125_infinity-ground_logo.svg
Token symbol (ticker) AIN
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) —
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x9558a9254890B2A8B057a789F413631B9084f4a3
Token model (token_type) utility (access + payment + staking + governance)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 AIN (BscScan + whitepaper tokenomics)
Issuance fixed; the whitepaper mentions milestone‑based token burning
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) Total supply 1B; allocations are described in the whitepaper tokenomics
Governance governance via AIN is claimed
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty —
Team (team) —
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) agent-based code generation/verification
Use‑case (use_case) natural language → apps/contracts
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 3 / 2 / 2 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-11

General project overview

Infinity Ground is a web platform positioned as a web3‑native agentic IDE: the user formulates a task in human language, and the system helps generate code/an application, run and publish the result, as well as remix other users’ work. The website has a showcase of user‑generated applications and a “Remix App” flow, which indirectly confirms the product part.

Separately, in the documentation (whitepaper) the project describes a broader goal: “onchain creation” and a multi‑layer “decentralized architecture” (execution/data/model/hosting layers). In the public product this looks like a SaaS IDE, while the “onchain/decentralized” components are described architecturally per Tier‑1, but the card’s open sources do not list specific addresses/contracts (other than the token).

Features/modules

  • Infinity IDE (Agentic IDE): generation of applications/assets from a prompt, showcase, remixes.
  • Workflow orchestration: the whitepaper claims a parallel execution engine and a feedback loop (generation → check/refine → edits).
  • Web3 templates/scenarios: the IDE page has tutorials on WalletConnect, airdrop applications, integrations (thirdweb), payments.
  • Staking AIN: a separate staking page indicating the supported network (BNB Chain).

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (quick app): the user writes “make X” → the IDE generates a web application → the user runs/shares/remixes it.
  • Scenario 2 (web3 integration): the user asks to make “wallet connect + token prices” → the IDE generates an application with Web3 integrations (per the tutorials).
  • Scenario 3 (ecosystem participation): an AIN holder stakes the token → receives yield/incentives and (as claimed) future airdrop allocations.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an account on the website (email/telegram) and/or a web3 wallet (login via WalletConnect/OKX is available).
  • Network/chain: for onchain actions around AIN (for example, staking) — BNB Chain.
  • Fees: standard BNB Chain gas fees for onchain operations (staking/token transfers); the use of the IDE as a web service — the public page does not disclose pricing.

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components (publicly visible): the IDE web client, server‑side orchestration (code generation/checking), the “remix” showcase/catalog.
  • Components (as claimed in the whitepaper): application layer, execution layer (smart contracts and logic on different networks), data layer (decentralized storage/DA), model layer (decentralized AI models), hosting layer (decentralized hosting/self‑custody).
  • Where logic runs: today the product looks like an offchain IDE; onchain is confirmed by the AIN token contract on BNB Chain; “onchain creation / execution layer” are described at the level of architectural claims.
  • Dependencies: third‑party LLM providers (the whitepaper mentions GPT‑4/Claude); web3 integrations (for example, WalletConnect, thirdweb — per the tutorials on the IDE page).

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility (per the whitepaper): payments for services/features and transaction fees; purchase of tiered NFT memberships; access to the launchpad/marketplace; participation in governance; staking rewards. It is also claimed that in the future (if/when ING Network launches as an L2) AIN will be the rollup gas token.
  • Protocol necessity drivers: the project claims that AIN is the ecosystem’s “payment token”. In practice (per public data), the onchain token and a separate staking product are confirmed; how much the IDE is “tied” to AIN as mandatory payment is not proven by the public page.
  • Who pays fees: users on onchain operations on BNB Chain (gas); additional “payment” flows in AIN are claimed but require verification in the product/pricing.
  • Where fees go: not disclosed in the card’s open sources; the whitepaper describes general mechanics and “treasury allocations” as a subject of governance.
  • Issuance/burn: total supply 1B AIN (Tier‑1 + explorer). The whitepaper describes milestone‑based token burning and performance‑linked vesting, but without parameters in this fragment.
  • Incentive mechanisms: there is AIN staking (the Stake page); the whitepaper indicates the role of staking rewards.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: the whitepaper has a section on allocation (but without machine‑readable numbers in this card); it is recommended to cross‑check with the official chart/document.
  • Treasury: governance for decisions on treasury allocations is claimed; the specific mechanism (multisig/DAO/address) is not specified.

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: the whitepaper claims governance via AIN ownership, but the specific mechanisms (DAO/forum/snapshot/governance contracts) are not confirmed in this card.
  • Keys/multisig: the token contract shows an Ownable model and whitelist minters (admin control is present); there is no data on the keys of the protocol part.

Security and incidents

  • Audits / bug bounty: no public links to audits/a bug bounty were found in this card.
  • Incidents: no public postmortems/incidents are recorded in this card.
  • Threat model (notes):
    • Token admin risks: the AIN contract is Ownable and supports whitelist minters with limits; this means the existence of a controlling key and potential risks of managing the supply/mint policies.
    • IDE service risks: the product looks like a centralized web service that depends on external models/providers.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: an active web product (Infinity IDE) + the onchain AIN token on BNB Chain; the “decentralized/onchain creation” part is described as architecture/plan.
  • Roadmap: published in the whitepaper.

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations (observed/claimed): WalletConnect/OKX (login/connect), thirdweb (in the IDE tutorials), GitHub sync (video tutorials on the IDE page), onchain — BNB Chain for AIN and staking.
  • Where it’s actually used: the “user generated” apps showcase on the IDE page; the Stake staking page.

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? Per the Tier‑1 description, Infinity IDE uses models (GPT‑4/Claude are mentioned) for intent analysis, workflow planning and autonomous code generation/verification/refinement; the website has a public IDE and a showcase of “user generated” applications.
  • What is truly onchain? The AIN token on BNB Chain is confirmed; the rest of the onchain part (“onchain creation”, execution/data/hosting layers) is described architecturally in the whitepaper, but without an explicit list of addresses/contracts in the card’s open sources.
  • Why is a token needed? In the whitepaper, AIN is claimed as the ecosystem’s payment token (services/features/fees), for membership/NFT, the launchpad/marketplace, governance and staking; there is actually also a staking product on BNB Chain.
  • Red flags (based on the information found):
    • onchain‑washing risk: apart from the token, there are no verifiable addresses/contracts of the “onchain creation / execution layer” → double‑check what actually works onchain and where.
    • token‑washing risk: the utilities are listed broadly; some may be implementable via a subscription/USDC → double‑check where AIN is mandatory in the product.
    • admin risks: the AIN contract is Ownable + whitelist minting (per the code on the explorer).

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 5/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality high 3
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity medium 2
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): Tier‑1 contains not only “intentions” but also descriptions of a working AI component of the IDE (see AI_1/AI_2/AI_4), so AI_0 does not apply.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/2.-infinity-ide-optimizing-ai-workflows
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): AI_0 = 1 is set only when AI_1..AI_4 = 0; here they are = 1.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The IDE uses models (GPT‑4/Claude) for intent analysis, workflow planning, code generation/verification/refinement.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/2.-infinity-ide-optimizing-ai-workflows
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly describes what work the AI does in the product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The public Infinity IDE page demonstrates app creation “by natural language” and a “User Generated” section with app remixes.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.infinityg.ai/ide
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): There is a public demo/showcase that shows the claimed UX (NL → app/remix).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: no public quantitative metrics of code generation/debugging/verification quality were found.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/2.-infinity-ide-optimizing-ai-workflows
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 contains a description of the mechanics, but no measurable metrics/benchmarks → AI_3 = 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): The whitepaper describes the components of the IDE’s AI workflow: parallel execution engine, feedback loop, routing of modular models, generation/verification/refinement.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/2.-infinity-ide-optimizing-ai-workflows
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a technical description of the architectural modules of the IDE’s AI component (albeit at a high level).
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: AIN token contract: 0x9558a9254890B2A8B057a789F413631B9084f4a3
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x9558a9254890B2A8B057a789F413631B9084f4a3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is an onchain artifact with an address on a specific network.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: the whitepaper claims “onchain creation”, an execution layer (execution of smart contracts/logic on several networks), data/hosting layers for ownership/self‑custody.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/1.-onchain-creation-and-decentralized-architecture
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 describes onchain logic beyond the token; but there are no addresses/contracts for independent verification of the implementation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: the current public product (the IDE) looks like SaaS and can conceptually work without a blockchain; Tier‑1 does not prove that a key property breaks without onchain.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.infinityg.ai/ide; https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/1.-onchain-creation-and-decentralized-architecture
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is an onchain narrative, but no proof of the criticality of onchain for the current product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, AIN (BEP‑20).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x9558a9254890B2A8B057a789F413631B9084f4a3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the token exists → TK_0 = 0.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AIN is claimed as the ecosystem’s payment token: purchase of services/features and payment of transaction fees.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/tokenomics/4.-multifunctional-ain-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 directly lists payments/fees as a token utility.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AIN supports staking rewards; the website has a Stake product for staking AIN.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://www.infinityg.ai/stake; https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/tokenomics/4.-multifunctional-ain-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is a Tier‑1 description of staking rewards and a Tier‑1 staking page.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AIN ownership is claimed as a condition for participating in governance (influence on treasury allocations, upgrades, direction).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/tokenomics/4.-multifunctional-ain-token-utility
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 formulates the governance utility; the specific implementation of governance modules/contracts is not disclosed.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a significant part of AIN’s functions (payment for services/access/subscriptions) is conceptually replaceable by a stablecoin/subscription; the mandatory nature of AIN in the IDE is not proven.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/tokenomics/4.-multifunctional-ain-token-utility; https://www.infinityg.ai/ide
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): Tier‑1 lists the utilities but does not prove the “non‑replaceability” of the token for the product → we consider the token replaceable and reduce the token_score.
  • Conflict note (if any): —

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://www.infinityg.ai/ide The public Infinity IDE: the claimed UX “create apps by natural language”, the “User Generated” showcase, the remix flow (product demo).
Tier‑1 https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/2.-infinity-ide-optimizing-ai-workflows Tier‑1 description of the IDE’s AI workflow: parallel execution engine, use of GPT‑4/Claude for code generation/verification/refinement, feedback loop, model routing.
Tier‑1 https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/ing-protocol-techstack/1.-onchain-creation-and-decentralized-architecture Tier‑1 claim about “onchain creation” and the multi‑layer architecture (execution/data/model/hosting).
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x9558a9254890B2A8B057a789F413631B9084f4a3 Onchain fact: the AIN token on BNB Chain, the contract address, max total supply, verified source code (Ownable, whitelist‑minters).
Tier‑1 https://infinity-ground.gitbook.io/whitepaper/tokenomics/4.-multifunctional-ain-token-utility Tier‑1 AIN utility: payments/fees, memberships/NFT, launchpad/marketplace, governance, staking rewards; a claim to the role of gas in a future L2.
Tier‑1 https://www.infinityg.ai/stake Public AIN staking (BNB Chain) + claimed incentives (rewards/airdrops/partner yields).

No comments to display

Back to top