Skip to main content

WORLD3

WORLD3 — a reference card for a crypto project: what the product does and how verifiable the project’s key claims are; also — alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis (DecAI Fit).

WORLD3 — an AI/Agents | Infra project that builds a platform for creating and deploying autonomous AI agents (an “AI workforce”) to automate tasks in Web2/Web3. The ecosystem has its own protocol for delegating onchain actions (WORLD AI Protocol) and the WAI token (BEP‑20 on BNB Smart Chain), which the docs describe as fuel/utility and governance.

Disclaimer

Important: this page is a reference overview of the project. Within DecAIHub, we separately record a verification based on open sources within the AI thesis (what is real AI/onchain/why a token, and which sources this is based on).
This is not financial advice and not a recommendation to buy/sell/hold any asset. We do not assess price, returns, or entry/exit timing.
Conclusions are based on publicly available materials found as of the verification date. The absence of confirmation does not imply the absence of the technology.

TL;DR (for readers who are not into AI)

  • What it is: a builder and an “operating environment” for autonomous AI agents that perform tasks (DeFi/games/social media/research) 24/7.
  • Who it’s for: Web3 users and teams/developers who need agents, plugins (skills) and knowledge bases (knowledge packs).
  • Why onchain/token: onchain is needed for secure delegation of actions and for accounting of permissions/limits; the WAI token is used as “fuel” (payment for operations/access to premium modules) and for governance (per the whitepaper).
  • What you can actually touch (Tier‑1): https://world3.ai/

How it works (very briefly)

  1. The user does: creates/deploys an agent (no‑code portal), connects skills/knowledge packs and sets tasks.
  2. The system does: the agent plans and executes steps, including interaction with dApps/websites; for onchain actions, delegation of permissions per the WORLD AI Protocol is used (limits by time/number of calls/functions).
  3. The user gets: a working “AI employee” that autonomously performs repetitive/multi‑step tasks.
  4. Where the blockchain is: the WAI token (BEP‑20) and the onchain delegation/authorization structures for onchain actions.
  5. Token role (if any): paying for launching/running agents and premium modules, participating in incentives and governance (per the tokenomics).

Quick links: AI thesis fit

Project passport

Field Value
Project name WORLD3
Also known as (aliases) WORLD3 AI; World AI Protocol; WAI
Logo (logo) ../assets/140_world3_logo.jpg
Token symbol (ticker) WAI
Category AI/Agents | Infra
Primary chain (chain) BNB Smart Chain
Type EVM
Network status mainnet
Consensus (consensus) PoSA (BNB Smart Chain; 21 validators)
Launch date (launch_date) 2025-08-08 (the “submitted for verification” date of the token contract)
Project status (status) active
Token (standard) BEP-20
Token contract 0x1E3dbC0aad9671FDD31E58b2fcc6cF1Ca9947994
Token model (token_type) utility (payments + governance)
Max supply 1,000,000,000 WAI (capped supply)
Issuance fixed cap + vesting/unlock schedule (per the tokenomics)
Tokenomics (tokenomics, brief) total supply 1B; distribution (AI Agent Ecosystem 47%, Airdrops 16%, Early backers 12%, etc.)
Governance DAO: WAI holders (per the tokenomics)
Admins/keys —
Audit —
Bug bounty yes (bug bounty program in the docs)
Team (team) WORLD3 Core Team (authors of the whitepaper)
Funding (investors/funding) —
AI component (ai_component) autonomous AI agents + agent VM + skills/knowledge
Use‑case (use_case) Web3 task automation via AI agents
DecAI Fit — AI thesis fit 6/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
DecAI Fit component summary 3 / 2 / 3 / 3
Last verified 2026-02-05

General project overview

In the Tier‑1 whitepaper (July 2025), WORLD3 describes the product as a “decentralized platform” for creating and deploying AI agents that can perform complex multi‑step tasks both in Web2 and in Web3. In the public product this takes the form of the Agent Hub/Agent Market/AI Chat and modularity via Skill Plugins and Knowledge Packs.

A separate technical layer is the WORLD AI Protocol (Tier‑1 GitHub), which describes onchain delegation of permissions: the user (principal) grants the agent (agent) limited permissions to call specific functions (function selectors) with restrictions on time and number of calls, plus the agent’s signature “for consent” is required.

Features/modules

  • Agent Hub / Agent Portal (no‑code): creation and deployment of agents.
  • Skill Plugins + Knowledge Packs: extending an agent’s capabilities with modules.
  • WORLD AI Protocol (delegation framework): limited delegation of onchain actions.
  • Marketplaces: Agent Market, the skills/knowledge marketplace.
  • WAI token: claimed as fuel for agent operations and as a governance token.

Typical scenarios

  • Scenario 1 (DeFi/operations): the user deploys an agent → sets a strategy → the agent performs repetitive onchain actions within the granted limits.
  • Scenario 2 (social media/content): the user creates an agent for generating/posting content and working with platforms (via skills).
  • Scenario 3 (games/quests): the agent participates in the ecosystem’s game/quest mechanics, completing tasks autonomously.

Getting started (wallet/network)

  • What you need: an account/access to the web portal; an EVM wallet for onchain operations and the WAI token.
  • Network/chain: BNB Smart Chain (the token contract is on bscscan).
  • Fees: BNB gas for onchain actions (delegation/contract calls, etc.).

Architecture/tech (non‑AI)

  • Components: the agent web portal; the WAI token smart contract; contracts/reference implementations of the WORLD AI Protocol; offchain runtime/automation (per the platform description).
  • Participant roles: users (principals), agents (agents), skills/knowledge creators, ecosystem developers.
  • Where logic runs: task planning/execution — offchain; authorization and restriction of onchain actions — onchain via the delegation protocol; economic accounting — via the token.
  • Dependencies: BNB Chain infrastructure + smart contracts; external Web2/Web3 services to which skills connect.

Token/economics (expanded, no forecasts)

  • Token utility: “operate AI agents”, “unlock premium capabilities”, “power creator economy”, “enable governance” (from the tokenomics).
  • Protocol necessity drivers: per the tokenomics, the token creates demand through regular agent operations and the purchase of premium modules.
  • Who pays fees: users who launch/use agents and buy modules; gas is paid on the BNB network.
  • Where fees go: the tokenomics describes the “AI Agent Ecosystem” fund as the source of subsidies/rewards/grants; a direct onchain fee split is not specified.
  • Issuance/burn: capped 1B supply; release until T+36M according to the schedule (tokenomics).
  • Security/incentive mechanisms: incentives (airdrops, ecosystem rewards) and long vesting for backers/core contributors.
  • Distribution and token issuance schedule: described in detail in the tokenomics (categories + cliffs/vesting).
  • Treasury: community growth/AI agent ecosystem allocations in the tokenomics (the execution mechanics in contracts are not disclosed within this card).

Governance

  • Who makes decisions: WAI holders via the DAO (described in the tokenomics).
  • How protocol parameters change: — (in this card we record the governance utility, without details of specific voting contracts).
  • Where decisions are discussed/made: docs/whitepaper + GitHub (for the protocol part).
  • Keys/multisig: —.

Security and incidents

  • Audits: —.
  • Bug bounty: there is a bug bounty program (in the docs).
  • Incidents: —.
  • Threat model: delegation risks (overly broad agent permissions), risks of exploits of contracts/skills, risks of compromise of the offchain “agent runtime”.

Project status and timeline

  • Current status: active (the web product is available; the token contract exists; the docs are being updated).
  • Key releases/milestones: the whitepaper is dated July 2025; the token contract was verified on 2025‑08‑08 (bscscan).
  • Roadmap: published in the docs (see links).

Ecosystem/integrations

  • Integrations: BNB Chain; the protocol’s GitHub repository; the skills/knowledge packs marketplace; dApps in the ecosystem (Agent Hub/Quest, etc. on the website).
  • Partners: —.
  • Where it’s actually used: Tier‑1 confirms the existence of the web portal and of the public delegation protocol (GitHub).

AI component of the project

  • What is real AI here? autonomous AI agents with task planning/execution; a skills/knowledge ecosystem (Tier‑1 docs + a working portal).
  • What is truly onchain? the WAI token and onchain delegation of permissions (WORLD AI Protocol: limits by functions/time/calls).
  • Why is a token needed? fuel for running agents/premium modules + incentives/airdrops + governance.
  • Red flags (based on the information found): “permission creep” risks (overly broad permissions granted to an agent), third‑party skills risks, risks of centralization of the offchain runtime. What to double‑check: the specific contracts/addresses of the delegation protocol in production.

DecAI Fit component summary

  • DecAI Fit: 6/6 — high alignment with the Decentralized AI thesis
Component Level Score
AI reality high 3
Onchain necessity medium 2
Token necessity high 3
Evidence Tier‑1 present 3
Details

AI reality

AI_0 — AI intent (Tier‑1 roadmap) (1/0)

  • AI_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): AI is a working part of the product (agents), not only an “intent”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the whitepaper describes a working AI‑agent product.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

AI_1 — what the AI does (1/0)

  • AI_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): AI agents perform task automation (hierarchical planning, continuous execution, cross‑platform automation).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the function of the AI agents and the application scenarios are clearly described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

AI_2 — demos/examples (1/0)

  • AI_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): a public agent portal/hub (Agent Hub/Market/Chat) is available, where an agent can be deployed and run.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://world3.ai/
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): this is a verifiable user artifact of the product’s operation.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

AI_3 — metrics/quality (1/0)

  • AI_3 (decision): 0
  • Metrics: —.
  • Context (version/date/how measured): —.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the Tier‑1 whitepaper contains no verifiable benchmarks of model quality/accuracy.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

AI_4 — tech description/architecture/versions (1/0)

  • AI_4 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): there is a technical description of the WORLD AI Protocol (the architecture of permission delegation, mappings/structures, the authorization lifecycle).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/WORLD3-ai/world_ai_protocol
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the README describes the architecture and workflow of the protocol.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

Onchain necessity

OC_1 — contracts/addresses/chain (1/0)

  • OC_1 (decision): 1
  • Chain: BNB Smart Chain
  • Addresses/identifiers: 0x1E3dbC0aad9671FDD31E58b2fcc6cF1Ca9947994 (token contract)
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://bscscan.com/token/0x1E3dbC0aad9671FDD31E58b2fcc6cF1Ca9947994
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): there is an onchain token contract and a profile in the explorer.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

OC_2 — onchain beyond just a token (1/0)

  • OC_2 (decision): 1
  • What useful logic is onchain: the permission delegation protocol for agents (limits by functions/time/calls) as an onchain component.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://github.com/WORLD3-ai/world_ai_protocol
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): onchain authorization/verification logic is described that does not reduce to “just a token”.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

OC_3 — onchain is critical (1/0)

  • OC_3 (decision): 0
  • “Replace the blockchain” test: part of the product (agents/skills) can run offchain; the criticality of onchain as the sole operating layer is not proven in Tier‑1.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the product is hybrid (offchain runtime + onchain delegation/economy).
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

Token necessity

TK_0 — no token (1/0)

  • TK_0 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the project has a token, WAI.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics describes WAI as the core utility token.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

TK_1..TK_4 (1/0)

TK_1 — payment for the service (1/0)

  • TK_1 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): users “spend $WAI to deploy, activate, and run AI Agents” and buy/subscribe to premium skills/knowledge.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): a direct payment/spending layer of the token is described.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

TK_2 — incentives/collateral/penalties (1/0)

  • TK_2 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): significant allocations for ecosystem rewards/airdrops/creator incentives (AI Agent Ecosystem 47%, Airdrop 16%).
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics directly describes incentives for ecosystem participants.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

TK_3 — governance (1/0)

  • TK_3 (decision): 1
  • Claim (one line): WAI holders participate in the DAO: “voting on key development decisions, fund allocations…”.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the governance utility is described explicitly.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

TK_4 — token is replaceable (1/0)

  • TK_4 (decision): 0
  • Claim (one line): the token is built into the platform model (fuel + creator economy + governance); a replacement would change the economy and the distribution of incentives.
  • Evidence: Tier‑1 — https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics
  • Why sufficient / why not (one line): the tokenomics ties value to regular use of the platform and to governance.
  • Conflict note (if any): —.

Evidence (table)

Tier Source What it proves
Tier‑1 https://docs.world3.ai/world3 that this is an AI‑agent platform; a high‑level description of the product (whitepaper)
Tier‑1 https://world3.ai/ the existence of a working web portal (Agent Hub/Market/Chat) as a demo
Tier‑1 https://docs.world3.ai/world3/readme/tokenomics the role of the WAI token, supply/allocations/vesting/utility/governance
Tier‑1 https://github.com/WORLD3-ai/world_ai_protocol a technical description of the onchain delegation framework
Tier‑1 https://bscscan.com/token/0x1E3dbC0aad9671FDD31E58b2fcc6cF1Ca9947994 the token contract on BSC (max supply 1B, verified source)

No comments to display

Back to top